Fabio Pittella-Silva

Prof. Dr. Fabio Pittella-Silva

University of Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 July 2004 in Nature Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Ryuji HamamotoRyuji Hamamoto
Ryuji Hamamoto
YFYoichi Furukawa
Yoichi Furukawa
MMMasashi Morita
Masashi Morita
YIYuko Iimura
Yuko Iimura
FPFabio Pittella-Silva
Fabio Pittella-Silva
YNYusuke Nakamura
Yusuke Nakamura

25 January 2006 in Cancer Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Ryuji HamamotoRyuji Hamamoto
Ryuji Hamamoto
FPFabio Pittella-Silva
Fabio Pittella-Silva
MTMasataka Tsuge
Masataka Tsuge
TNToshihiko Nishidate
Toshihiko Nishidate
TKToyomasa Katagiri
Toyomasa Katagiri
YFYoichi Furukawa
Yoichi Furukawa

15 November 2007 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMasaki Kunizaki
Masaki Kunizaki
Ryuji HamamotoRyuji Hamamoto
Ryuji Hamamoto
FPFabio Pittella-Silva
Fabio Pittella-Silva
KYKiyoshi Yamaguchi
Kiyoshi Yamaguchi
TNTakeshi Nagayasu
Takeshi Nagayasu
YFYoichi Furukawa
Yoichi Furukawa
We previously identified SMYD3 as a histone methyltransferase and showed that its expression was elevated in colorectal, hepatocellular, and breast carcinomas. In the investigation of methyltransferase activity of SMYD3, we have found that vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 (VEGFR1) was also methylated by SMYD3. We further identified the methylated residue at VEGFR1 lysine 831, which is located in the kinase domain and is conserved among VEGFR1 orthologues. We also found that the lysine is followed by serine, which is conserved among some of the methylation targets of histone methyltransferases. Furthermore, methylation of VEGFR1 enhanced its kinase activity in cells. These data should be helpful for the profound understanding of the biological role of SMYD3 and regulatory mechanisms of VEGFR1. Additionally our finding may facilitate the development of strategies that may inhibit the progression of cancer cells. [Cancer Res 2007;67(22):10759–65]

11 September 2005 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MTMasataka Tsuge
Masataka Tsuge
Ryuji HamamotoRyuji Hamamoto
Ryuji Hamamoto
FPFabio Pittella-Silva
Fabio Pittella-Silva
YOYozo Ohnishi
Yozo Ohnishi
KCKazuaki Chayama
Kazuaki Chayama
YNYusuke Nakamura
Yusuke Nakamura

1 July 2014 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ALAnais Laforest
Anais Laforest
TAThomas Aparicio
Thomas Aparicio
AZAziz Zaanan
Aziz Zaanan
FPFabio Pittella-Silva
Fabio Pittella-Silva
ADAudrey Didelot
Audrey Didelot
PLPierre Laurent-Puig
Pierre Laurent-Puig

9 June 2020 in Clinical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FPFabio Pittella-Silva
Fabio Pittella-Silva
YCYoon Ming Chin
Yoon Ming Chin
HCHiu Ting Chan
Hiu Ting Chan
SNSatoshi Nagayama
Satoshi Nagayama
EMEisaku Miyauchi
Eisaku Miyauchi
YNYusuke Nakamura
Yusuke Nakamura
Background: Blood-based analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising tool for cancer screening, monitoring relapse/recurrence and evaluating response to treatment. Although plasma is widely used to obtain ctDNA, biorepositories worldwide possess a huge number of serum samples and comparative studies on the use of serum vs plasma as ctDNA sources are essential.Methods: We analyzed cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from matched EDTA-plasma and serum samples from healthy donors and patients with colorectal or lung cancer, and used targeted next-generation sequencing to evaluate mutation detection efficiency and reproducibility. Matched samples from healthy individuals were spiked with reference oligonucleotides and sequenced using the Ion-S5 Oncomine-Pan-Cancer panel. Detection efficiency in matched samples from patients with cancer was evaluated using 2 distinct gene panels and compared to mutations found in tissue-biopsy samples at diagnosis.Results: Mean total cfDNA was 55% higher in serum samples and the presence of longer DNA fragments was significantly increased in serum compared with plasma samples (P = 0.0001 to 0.015). Spiked mutated nucleotides were detected in both samples, but allele frequencies (AF) were approximately half in serum compared with plasma, suggesting ctDNA from serum was more diluted by DNA of noncancerous origins. Matched samples from patients with cancer revealed that up to 44.8% of mutations with low AF were missed in serum samples and concordance rates with somatic mutations found in tissue biopsy at diagnosis was better in plasma samples.Conclusion: The use of serum in retrospective studies should consider the limitations for detecting low AF mutations. Plasma is clearly preferable for prospective clinical applications of liquid biopsy.