Rupendra SHRESTHA

Dr. Rupendra SHRESTHA

Department of Natural and Applied Sciences (NAAS), Nexus Institute of Research and Innovation (NIRI), Kathmandu, Bāgmatī, Nepal
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 August 2025 in Medcomm
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DSDhasarathdev Srinivasan
Dhasarathdev Srinivasan
RBRanjith Balakrishnan
Ranjith Balakrishnan
ACAnkush Chauhan
Ankush Chauhan
JKJeevan Kumar
Jeevan Kumar
DGDinesh Murugan Girija
Dinesh Murugan Girija
RSRajasekaran Subbarayan
Rajasekaran Subbarayan
Radiation therapy is a fundamental component of cancer treatment, benefiting 50%–70% of patients by selectively targeting malignant tissues. However, radioresistance remains a significant challenge, often driven by epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT). EMT increases cancer invasiveness and metastasis by upregulating mesenchymal markers, including vimentin and N‐cadherin, and downregulating epithelial markers, such as E‐cadherin. EMT under radiation involves principal signaling pathways, including TGF‐β, Wnt/β‐catenin, Notch, and ERK, which regulate EMT through transcription factors such as Snail, Slug, Twist, and Zeb1/2. These alterations drive cytoskeletal reorganization, decrease cell–cell adhesion, and enhance extracellular matrix degradation via integrins, MMP‐2, and MMP‐9. We also explored how growth hormones, inflammatory cytokines, and hypoxia in the tumor microenvironment affect radiation‐induced EMT. Targeting EMT pathways with monoclonal antibodies and small‐molecule inhibitors of signaling pathways may help overcome radioresistance. However, due to the dual role of EMT in cancer progression and tissue regeneration, precise treatment strategies are essential. There is a lack of comprehensive multi‐omics studies that provide insights into postradiation EMT progression. This review examines how radiation induces EMT and its impact on metastasis and immune responses while also proposing therapeutic approaches. Integrating EMT‐targeting strategies with existing cancer treatments could enhance the effectiveness of radiotherapy and improve patient outcomes.

20 March 2025 in Molecular Nutrition & Food Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ARAswathi Ramesh
Aswathi Ramesh
DSDhasarathdev Srinivasan
Dhasarathdev Srinivasan
RSRajasekaran Subbarayan
Rajasekaran Subbarayan
ACAnkush Chauhan
Ankush Chauhan
LKLoganathan Krishnamoorthy
Loganathan Krishnamoorthy
Rupendra SHRESTHARupendra SHRESTHA
Rupendra SHRESTHA

6 January 2026 in Cancer Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ARAswathi Ramesh
Aswathi Ramesh
RSRajasekaran Subbarayan
Rajasekaran Subbarayan
Rupendra SHRESTHARupendra SHRESTHA
Rupendra SHRESTHA
PAPooja Narain Adtani
Pooja Narain Adtani
Background: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has emerged as a groundbreaking strategy for modulating the gut microbiome and improving cancer treatment outcomes. This review synthesizes the current evidence on the role of FMT in oncology, focusing on its potential to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy, restore microbiome homeostasis, and mitigate cancer‐associated complications. Recent Findings: Preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated that FMT can reprogram the tumor microenvironment, augment immune checkpoint inhibitor responses, and reduce chemotherapy‐induced toxicity. However, risks such as pathogen transmission, immune dysregulation, and unintended microbial shifts necessitate rigorous donor screening and a personalized approach. Challenges in standardization, regulatory frameworks, and mechanistic understanding further complicate their clinical translation. Emerging innovations, including precision microbial consortia, synthetic biology, and biomarker‐driven strategies, have the potential to address these limitations. Conclusion: While FMT holds transformative potential in cancer care, its integration into oncological practice requires robust clinical validation, long‐term safety assessments, and interdisciplinary collaboration to harness its full therapeutic potential.

9 January 2019 in Cells
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Rupendra SHRESTHARupendra SHRESTHA
Rupendra SHRESTHA
YWYao-Tseng Wen
Yao-Tseng Wen
Dah-Ching DingDah-Ching Ding
Dah-Ching Ding
Rong-Kung TsaiRong-Kung Tsai
Rong-Kung Tsai
Human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived three-dimensional retinal organoids are a new platform for studying the organoidogenesis. However, recurrent genomic aberration, acquired during generation of hiPSCs, limit its biomedical application and/or aberrant hiPSCs has not been evaluated for generation of differentiated derivatives, such as organoids and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). In this study, we efficiently differentiated mosaic hiPSCs into retinal organoids containing mature photoreceptors. The feeder-free hiPSCs were generated from the human epidermal keratinocytes that were rapid in process with improved efficiency over several passages and maintained pluripotency. But, hiPSCs were cytogenetically mosaic with normal and abnormal karyotypes, while copy number variation analysis revealed the loss of chromosome 8q. Despite this abnormality, the stepwise differentiation of hiPSCs to form retinal organoids was autonomous and led to neuronal lamination. Furthermore, the use of a Notch inhibitor, DAPT, at an early timepoint from days 29–42 of culture improved the specification of the retinal neuron and the use of retinoic acid at days 70–120 led to the maturation of photoreceptors. hiPSC-derived retinal organoids acquired all subtypes of photoreceptors, such as RHODOPSIN, B-OPSIN and R/G-OPSIN. Additionally, the advanced maturation of photoreceptors was observed, revealing the development of specific sensory cilia and the formation of the outer-segment disc. This report is the first to show that hiPSCs with abnormal chromosomal content are permissive to the generation of three-dimensional retinal organoids.

6 January 2025 in Radiation and Environmental Biophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DSDhasarathdev Srinivasan
Dhasarathdev Srinivasan
RSRajasekaran Subbarayan
Rajasekaran Subbarayan
MKMadhan Krishnan
Madhan Krishnan
RBRanjith Balakrishna
Ranjith Balakrishna
PAPooja Adtani
Pooja Adtani
ARArunkumar Radhakrishnan
Arunkumar Radhakrishnan

1 December 2016 in Tissue and Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Rupendra SHRESTHARupendra SHRESTHA
Rupendra SHRESTHA
APAsha Palat
Asha Palat
APAlan M. Punnoose
Alan M. Punnoose
SJShailesh Joshi
Shailesh Joshi
DPD. Ponraju
D. Ponraju
SPSolomon Franklin Durairaj Paul
Solomon Franklin Durairaj Paul