Nationwide population-based cohort provides a new opportunity to build an automated risk prediction model based on individuals’ history of health and healthcare beyond existing risk prediction models. We tested the possibility of machine learning models to predict future incidence of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) using large-scale administrative health data. From the Korean National Health Insurance Service database between 2002 and 2010, we obtained de-identified health data in elders above 65 years (N = 40,736) containing 4,894 unique clinical features including ICD-10 codes, medication codes, laboratory values, history of personal and family illness and socio-demographics. To define incident AD we considered two operational definitions: “definite AD” with diagnostic codes and dementia medication (n = 614) and “probable AD” with only diagnosis (n = 2026). We trained and validated random forest, support vector machine and logistic regression to predict incident AD in 1, 2, 3, and 4 subsequent years. For predicting future incidence of AD in balanced samples (bootstrapping), the machine learning models showed reasonable performance in 1-year prediction with AUC of 0.775 and 0.759, based on “definite AD” and “probable AD” outcomes, respectively; in 2-year, 0.730 and 0.693; in 3-year, 0.677 and 0.644; in 4-year, 0.725 and 0.683. The results were similar when the entire (unbalanced) samples were used. Important clinical features selected in logistic regression included hemoglobin level, age and urine protein level. This study may shed a light on the utility of the data-driven machine learning model based on large-scale administrative health data in AD risk prediction, which may enable better selection of individuals at risk for AD in clinical trials or early detection in clinical settings.

Background: This study proposes a cardiovascular diseases (CVD) prediction model using machine learning (ML) algorithms based on the National Health Insurance Service-Health Screening datasets. Methods: We extracted 4699 patients aged over 45 as the CVD group, diagnosed according to the international classification of diseases system (I20–I25). In addition, 4699 random subjects without CVD diagnosis were enrolled as a non-CVD group. Both groups were matched by age and gender. Various ML algorithms were applied to perform CVD prediction; then, the performances of all the prediction models were compared. Results: The extreme gradient boosting, gradient boosting, and random forest algorithms exhibited the best average prediction accuracy (area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC): 0.812, 0.812, and 0.811, respectively) among all algorithms validated in this study. Based on AUROC, the ML algorithms improved the CVD prediction performance, compared to previously proposed prediction models. Preexisting CVD history was the most important factor contributing to the accuracy of the prediction model, followed by total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, waist-height ratio, and body mass index. Conclusions: Our results indicate that the proposed health screening dataset-based CVD prediction model using ML algorithms is readily applicable, produces validated results and outperforms the previous CVD prediction models.

Kim DY, et al. Brain Neurorehabil. 2023 Jul;16(2):e18. https://doi.org/10.12786/bn.2023.16.e18

Accurate, reliable prediction of risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD) is essential for early, disease-modifying therapeutics. Multimodal MRI, such as structural and diffusion MRI, is likely to contain complementary information of neurodegenerative processes in AD. Here we tested the utility of the multimodal MRI (T1-weighted structure and diffusion MRI), combined with high-throughput brain phenotyping-morphometry and structural connectomics-and machine learning, as a diagnostic tool for AD. We used, firstly, a clinical cohort at a dementia clinic (National Health Insurance Service-Ilsan Hospital [NHIS-IH]; N = 211; 110 AD, 64 mild cognitive impairment [MCI], and 37 cognitively normal with subjective memory complaints [SMC]) to test the diagnostic models; and, secondly, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI)-2 to test the generalizability. Our machine learning models trained on the morphometric and connectome estimates (number of features = 34,646) showed optimal classification accuracy (AD/SMC: 97% accuracy, MCI/SMC: 83% accuracy; AD/MCI: 97% accuracy) in NHIS-IH cohort, outperforming a benchmark model (FLAIR-based white matter hyperintensity volumes). In ADNI-2 data, the combined connectome and morphometry model showed similar or superior accuracies (AD/HC: 96%; MCI/HC: 70%; AD/MCI: 75% accuracy) compared with the CSF biomarker model (t-tau, p-tau, and Amyloid β, and ratios). In predicting MCI to AD progression in a smaller cohort of ADNI-2 (n = 60), the morphometry model showed similar performance with 69% accuracy compared with CSF biomarker model with 70% accuracy. Our comparisons of the classifiers trained on structural MRI, diffusion MRI, FLAIR, and CSF biomarkers showed the promising utility of the white matter structural connectomes in classifying AD and MCI in addition to the widely used structural MRI-based morphometry, when combined with machine learning.

Rhee SY, et al. J Clin Neurol. 2021 Oct;17(4):524-533. https://doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2021.17.4.524

Ye BK, et al. Ann Rehabil Med. 2015 Feb;39(1):128-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2015.39.1.128