Renato Barroso

Dr. Renato Barroso

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2022 in Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LCLeonardo Henrique Fernandes Carvalho
Leonardo Henrique Fernandes Carvalho
RJRoberto Moriggi Junior
Roberto Moriggi Junior
JBJúlia Barreira
Júlia Barreira
BSBrad Jon Schoenfeld
Brad Jon Schoenfeld
JOJohn Orazem
John Orazem
Renato BarrosoRenato Barroso
Renato Barroso
The purpose of this paper was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that compared muscle hypertrophy and strength gains between resistance training protocols employing very low (VLL < 30% of 1-repetition maximum (RM) or >35RM), low (LL30%–59% of 1RM, or 16–35RM), moderate (ML60%–79% of 1RM, or 8–15RM), and high (HL ≥ 80% of 1RM, or ≤7RM) loads with matched volume loads (sets × repetitions × weight). A pooled analysis of the standardized mean difference for 1RM strength outcomes across the studies showed a benefit favoring HL vs. LL and vs. ML and favoring ML vs. LL. The LL and VLL results showed little difference. A pooled analysis of the standardized mean difference for hypertrophy outcomes across all studies showed no differences between training loads. Our findings indicate that when the volume load is equal between conditions, the highest loads induce superior dynamic strength gains. Alternatively, hypertrophic adaptations were similar irrespective of the load magnitude. Novelty: Training with higher loads elicits greater gains in 1RM muscle strength when compared to lower loads, even when the volume load is equal between conditions. Muscle hypertrophy is similar irrespective of the magnitude of the load, even when the volume load is equal between conditions.

1 June 2017 in Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RKRonaldo Kobal
Ronaldo Kobal
Irineu LoturcoIrineu Loturco
Irineu Loturco
Renato BarrosoRenato Barroso
Renato Barroso
SGSaulo Gil
Saulo Gil
RCRogério Cuniyochi
Rogério Cuniyochi
VTValmor Tricoli
Valmor Tricoli
Kobal, R, Loturco, I, Barroso, R, Gil, S, Cuniyochi, R, Ugrinowitsch, C, Roschel, H, and Tricoli, V. Effects of different combinations of strength, power, and plyometric training on the physical performance of elite young soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 31(6): 1468–1476, 2017—The combination of strength (ST) and plyometric training (PT) has been shown to be effective for improving sport-specific performance. However, there is no consensus about the most effective way to combine these methods in the same training session to produce greater improvements in neuromuscular performance of soccer players. Thus, the purpose of this study was to compare the effects of different combinations of ST and PT sequences on strength, jump, speed, and agility capacities of elite young soccer players. Twenty-seven soccer players (age: 18.9 ± 0.6 years) participated in an 8-week resistance training program and were divided into 3 groups: complex training (CP) (ST before PT), traditional training (TD) (PT before ST), and contrast training (CT) (ST and PT performed alternately, set by set). The experimental design took place during the competitive period of the season. The ST composed of half-squat exercises performed at 60–80% of 1 repetition maximum (1RM); the PT composed of drop jump exercises executed in a range from 30 to 45 cm. After the experimental period, the maximum dynamic strength (half-squat 1RM) and vertical jump ability (countermovement jump height) increased similarly and significantly in the CP, TD, and CT (48.6, 46.3, and 53% and 13, 14.2, and 14.7%, respectively). Importantly, whereas the TD group presented a significant decrease in sprinting speed in 10 (7%) and 20 m (6%), the other groups did not show this response. Furthermore, no significant alterations were observed in agility performance in any experimental group. In conclusion, in young soccer players, different combinations and sequences of ST and PT sets result in similar performance improvements in muscle strength and jump ability. However, it is suggested that the use of the CP and CT methods is more indicated to maintain/maximize the sprint performance of these athletes.

21 March 2017 in Muscle & Nerve
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ETEmerson L. Teixeira
Emerson L. Teixeira
Renato BarrosoRenato Barroso
Renato Barroso
Carla Silva-BatistaCarla Silva-Batista
Carla Silva-Batista
GLGilberto C. Laurentino
Gilberto C. Laurentino
JLJeremy P. Loenneke
Jeremy P. Loenneke
VTValmor Tricoli
Valmor Tricoli

1 April 2012 in Journal of Aging and Physical Activity
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LWLilian França Wallerstein
Lilian França Wallerstein
VTValmor Tricoli
Valmor Tricoli
Renato BarrosoRenato Barroso
Renato Barroso
ARAndre Rodacki
Andre Rodacki
LRLuciano Russo
Luciano Russo
CUCarlos Ugrinowitsch
Carlos Ugrinowitsch
The purpose of this study was to compare the neuromuscular adaptations produced by strength-training (ST) and power-training (PT) regimens in older individuals. Participants were balanced by quadriceps cross-sectional area (CSA) and leg-press 1-repetition maximum and randomly assigned to an ST group (n = 14; 63.6 ± 4.0 yr, 79.7 ± 17.2 kg, and 163.9 ± 9.8 cm), a PT group (n = 16; 64.9 ± 3.9 yr, 63.9 ± 11.9 kg, and 157.4 ± 7.7 cm), or a control group (n = 13; 63.0 ± 4.0 yr, 67.2 ± 10.8 kg, and 159.8 ± 6.8 cm). ST and PT were equally effective in increasing (a) maximum dynamic and isometric strength (p < .05), (b) increasing quadriceps muscle CSA (p < .05), and (c) decreasing electrical mechanical delay of the vastus lateralis muscle (p < .05). There were no significant changes in neuromuscular activation after training. The novel finding of the current study is that PT seems to be an attractive alternative to regular ST to maintain and improve muscle mass.

15 January 2018 in Journal of Sports Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SGSaulo Gil
Saulo Gil
Renato BarrosoRenato Barroso
Renato Barroso
ECEverton Crivoi Do Carmo
Everton Crivoi Do Carmo
Irineu LoturcoIrineu Loturco
Irineu Loturco
RKRonaldo Kobal
Ronaldo Kobal
Hamilton RoschelHamilton Roschel
Hamilton Roschel
Resisted sprint training consists of performing overloaded sprints, which may produce greater effects than traditional sprint training. We compared a resisted sprint training with overload control versus an unresisted sprint training program on performance in soccer players. Eighteen elite athletes were randomly assigned to resisted (RST) or unresisted sprint training protocol (UR). Before and after a 6-week training period, sprinting ability, change of direction speed (COD), vertical jumps (SJ and CMJ), mean power (MP) and mean propulsive power (MPP) at distinct loads were assessed. Both groups improved sprinting ability at all distances evaluated (5m: UR = 8%, RST = 7%; 10m: UR = 5%, RST = 5%; 15m: UR = 4%, RST = 4%; 20m: UR = 3%, RST = 3%; 25m: UR = 2%, RST = 3%;), COD (UR = 6%; RST = 6%), SJ (UR = 15%; RST = 13%) and CMJ (UR = 15%; RST = 15%). Additionally, both groups increased MP and MPP at all loads evaluated. The between-group magnitude-based inference analysis demonstrated comparable improvement ("trivial" effect) in all variables tested. Finally, our findings support the effectiveness of a short-term training program involving squat jump exercise plus sprinting exercises to improve the performance of soccer players.

1 September 2011 in Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMauro AB Batista
Mauro AB Batista
Hamilton RoschelHamilton Roschel
Hamilton Roschel
Renato BarrosoRenato Barroso
Renato Barroso
CUCarlos Ugrinowitsch
Carlos Ugrinowitsch
VTValmor Tricoli
Valmor Tricoli
Th and training background on postactivation potentiation (PAP). A group of 23 subjects, composed of power track-and-field athletes (PT = 8), bodybuilders (BB = 7), and physically active subjects (PA = 8), participated in the study. Maximal dynamic strength (1 repetition maximum test) was assessed in the leg press exercise for subjects' characterization. Their countermovement vertical jump (CMJ) performance was assessed before and after 2 different conditioning activity (CA) protocols (1 or 3 maximum voluntary isometric contractions [MVICs] of 5-second duration in the leg press exercise) or after control (no CA), performed on separate days. No significant differences among groups were found for CMJ height or take-off velocity after any of the CA protocols (p ≤ 0.05). However, individual analysis showed that some subjects increased performance in response to the CA, despite their previous training history. We concluded that subjects' level of maximal dynamic strength and training background have no influence on PAP manifestation. Our data suggest that coaches should individually identify the athletes that are PAP responders before introducing MVICs as part of their warm-up routines....