Aims  To examine the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary service model delivering medication review to patients at risk of medication misadventure in the community.Methods  The study was carried out in three Australian states; Queensland, New South Wales and Western Australia, and conducted as a randomized, controlled effectiveness trial with the general practitioner (GP) as the unit of randomization. In total, 92 GPs, 53 pharmacists and 400 patients enrolled in the study. The multidisciplinary service model consisted of GP education, patient home visits, pharmacist medication reviews, primary healthcare team conferences, GP implementation of action plans in consultation with patients, and follow‐up surgery visits for monitoring. Effectiveness was assessed using the four clinical value compass domains of (i) functional status, (ii) clinical outcomes, (iii) satisfaction and (iv) costs. The domains of functional status (assessed by the health‐related quality of life measure SF‐36 subscales) and clinical outcomes (as assessed by adverse drug events (ADEs), number of GP visits, hospital services and severity of illness) were measured at baseline and endpoint. Satisfaction was measured by success in implementation and by participant satisfaction at endpoint, and costs (as assessed using medication and healthcare service costs, less intervention costs) were measured preintervention and during the trial. In addition, process evaluation was conducted for intervention patients, in which problems and recommendations from the medication reviews were described.Results  The model was successfully implemented with 92% of intervention GPs suggesting that the model had improved the care of participating patients, a view shared by 94% of pharmacists. In addition, positive trends in clinical outcomes (ADEs and severity of illness) and costs (an ongoing trend towards reduction in healthcare service costs) were evident, although the trial was limited to a 6‐month intervention time. No differences between intervention and control groups were identified for the health‐related quality of life domain. The cost–effectiveness ratio for the intervention based on cost savings, reduced adverse events and improved health outcomes was small. The most common problems identified in the medication reviews were potential adverse drug reactions, suboptimal monitoring and adherence/lack of concordance issues. In total, 54.4% of recommendations were enacted, and 23.9% were implemented precisely as recommended in the medication review. Follow‐up evaluation showed that 70.9% of actions had a positive outcome, 15.7% no effect and 3.7% had a negative outcome.Conclusions  Most studies emphasize efficacy and the best achievable clinical outcomes rather than whether an intervention will be effective in practice. The current trial showed that three of the four domains in the clinical value compass showed trends of improvement or were indeed improved in the relatively short follow‐up period of the trial, suggesting that a service based on this model could achieve similar benefits in practice. A domiciliary medication review programme similar to this model has now been implemented into national Australian practice, where GPs and pharmacists are reimbursed by the Australian government for the provision of these services.

Impaired cognition has a significant impact on a person’s ability to manage their medicines. The aim of this paper is to provide a narrative review of contemporary literature on medicines management by people with dementia or cognitive impairment living in the community, methods for assessing their capacity to safely manage medicines, and strategies for supporting independent medicines management. Studies and reviews addressing medicines management by people with dementia or cognitive impairment published between 2003 and 2013 were identified via searches of Medline and other databases. The literature indicates that as cognitive impairment progresses, the ability to plan, organise, and execute medicine management tasks is impaired, leading to increased risk of unintentional non-adherence, medication errors, preventable medication-related hospital admissions and dependence on family carers or community nursing services to assist with medicines management. Impaired functional capacity may not be detected by health professionals in routine clinical encounters. Assessment of patients’ (or carers’) ability to safely manage medicines is not undertaken routinely, and when it is there is variability in the methods used. Self-report and informant report may be helpful, but can be unreliable or prone to bias. Measures of cognitive function are useful, but may lack sensitivity and specificity. Direct observation, using a structured, standardised performance-based tool, may help to determine whether a person is able to manage their medicines and identify barriers to adherence such as inability to open medicine packaging. A range of strategies have been used to support independent medicines management in people with cognitive impairment, but there is little high-quality research underpinning these strategies. Further studies are needed to develop and evaluate approaches to facilitate safe medicines management by older people with cognitive impairment and their carers.

Pharmacotherapy is an essential component of medical care for older patients, and around two‐thirds of Australians over the age of 60 years use 4 or more drugs. Although polypharmacy is a well‐known risk factor for adverse drug events, use of multiple drugs may be unavoidable in the elderly with multiple comorbidities. While there have been concerns about inappropriate prescribing, polypharmacy and non‐adherence, it is now recognised that there are a broader range of drug‐related problems that need to be addressed. These include suboptimal monitoring of drugs, poor medication management in patients' homes, under‐prescribing and poor communication between health professionals. This is a review of the Australian literature on problems with medication use in the elderly, with guidelines for improving the quality of medicine use in this population.