Ryan Patrick Dias

Dr. Ryan Patrick Dias

Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 April 2020 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BGBrian M. Graves
Brian M. Graves
TJTyler J. Johnson
Tyler J. Johnson
RNRobert T. Nishida
Robert T. Nishida
Ryan Patrick DiasRyan Patrick Dias
Ryan Patrick Dias
BSBenjamin Savareear
Benjamin Savareear
ABAdam Boies
Adam Boies
Recent increases in marijuana use and legalization without adequate knowledge of the risks necessitate the characterization of the billions of nanoparticles contained in each puff of smoke. Tobacco smoke offers a benchmark given that it has been extensively studied. Tobacco and marijuana smoke particles are quantitatively similar in volatility, shape, density and number concentration, albeit with differences in size, total mass and chemical composition. Particles from marijuana smoke are on average 29% larger in mobility diameter than particles from tobacco smoke and contain 3.4× more total mass. New measurements of semi-volatile fractions determine over 97% of the mass and volume of the particles from either smoke source are comprised of semi-volatile compounds. For tobacco and marijuana smoke, respectively, 4350 and 2575 different compounds are detected, of which, 670 and 536 (231 in common) are tentatively identified, and of these, 173 and 110 different compounds (69 in common) are known to cause negative health effects through carcinogenic, mutagenic, teratogenic, or other toxic mechanisms. This study demonstrates striking similarities between marijuana and tobacco smoke in terms of their physical and chemical properties.

19 September 2020 in Metabolites
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Seo Lin NamSeo Lin Nam
Seo Lin Nam
Paulina de la MataPaulina de la Mata
Paulina de la Mata
Ryan Patrick DiasRyan Patrick Dias
Ryan Patrick Dias
James HarynukJames Harynuk
James Harynuk
Urine is a popular biofluid for metabolomics studies due to its simple, non-invasive collection and its availability in large quantities, permitting frequent sampling, replicate analyses, and sample banking. The biggest disadvantage with using urine is that it exhibits significant variability in concentration and composition within an individual over relatively short periods of time (arising from various external factors and internal processes regulating the body’s water and solute content). In treating the data from urinary metabolomics studies, one must account for the natural variability of urine concentrations to avoid erroneous data interpretation. Amongst various proposed approaches to account for broadly varying urine sample concentrations, normalization to creatinine has been widely accepted and is most commonly used. MS total useful signal (MSTUS) is another normalization method that has been recently reported for mass spectrometry (MS)-based metabolomics studies. Herein, we explored total useful peak area (TUPA), a modification of MSTUS that is applicable to GC×GC-TOFMS (and data from other separations platforms), for sample normalization in urinary metabolomics studies. Performance of TUPA was compared to the two most common normalization approaches, creatinine adjustment and Total Peak Area (TPA) normalization. Each normalized dataset was evaluated using Principal Component Analysis (PCA). The results showed that TUPA outperformed alternative normalization methods to overcome urine concentration variability. Results also conclusively demonstrate the risks in normalizing data to creatinine.

21 May 2018 in Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SLStephanie S. Lau
Stephanie S. Lau
Ryan Patrick DiasRyan Patrick Dias
Ryan Patrick Dias
KMKayla R. Martin-Culet
Kayla R. Martin-Culet
NRNicholas A. Race
Nicholas A. Race
MSMarella H. Schammel
Marella H. Schammel
JSJohn D. Sivey
John D. Sivey
Sodium sulfite, sodium thiosulfate, and ascorbic acid are commonly used to quench free chlorine and free bromine in studies of disinfection byproducts (DBPs) in drinking water, wastewater, and recreational water. The reducing capabilities of these quenchers, however, can lead to the degradation of some redox-labile analytes. Ammonium chloride, another common quencher, converts free chlorine into monochloramine and is therefore inappropriate for analytes susceptible to chloramination. Herein, we demonstrate the utility of 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene (TMB) as a quencher of free chlorine and free bromine. The reactivity of TMB toward free chlorine was characterized previously. The reactivity of TMB toward free bromine was quantified herein (kHOBr,TMB = 3.35 × 106 M−1 s−1) using competition kinetics. To explore the feasibility of TMB serving as a free halogen quencher for kinetic experiments, chlorination of 2,4-dichlorophenol, bromination of anisole, and chlorination and bromination of dimethenamid-P were examined. Although TMB does not react with free chlorine or free bromine as quickly as do some (but not all) traditional quenchers, there was generally no significant difference in the experimental rate constants with TMB (relative to thiosulfate) as the quencher. By monitoring the chlorination and bromination products of TMB, free halogen residuals in quenched samples were quantified. Furthermore, TMB did not affect the stabilities of DBPs (e.g., chloropicrin and bromoacetonitriles) that otherwise degraded in the presence of traditional quenchers. TMB could, therefore, be an appropriate quencher of free chlorine and free bromine in aqueous halogenation experiments involving redox-labile analytes and/or when selective quantification of residual free halogens is desired.

12 September 2023 in Food Research International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BBBen Bourrie
Ben Bourrie
NDNatalie Diether
Natalie Diether
Ryan Patrick DiasRyan Patrick Dias
Ryan Patrick Dias
SNSeo Lin Nam
Seo Lin Nam
AMA. Paulina de la Mata
A. Paulina de la Mata
BWBenjamin P. Willing
Benjamin P. Willing

1 October 2019 in Analytical Methods
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Ryan Patrick DiasRyan Patrick Dias
Ryan Patrick Dias
MSMarella H. Schammel
Marella H. Schammel
KRKeith P. Reber
Keith P. Reber
JSJohn D. Sivey
John D. Sivey
Free chlorine and free bromine (e.g., HOCl and HOBr) are employed as disinfectants in a variety of aqueous systems, including drinking water, wastewater, ballast water, recreational waters, and cleaning products. Yet, the most widely used methods for quantifying free halogens, including those employing N,N-diethyl-p-phenylenediamine (DPD), cannot distinguish between HOCl and HOBr. Herein, we report methods for selectively quantifying free halogens in a variety of aqueous systems using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene (TMB). At near-neutral pH, TMB reacted on the order of seconds with HOCl, HOBr, and inorganic bromamines to yield halogenated products that were readily quantified by liquid chromatography or, following liquid–liquid extraction, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The chlorinated and brominated products of TMB were stable, and their molar concentrations were used to calculate the original concentrations of HOCl (method quantitation limit (MQL) by GC-MS = 15 nmol L−1 = 1.1 μg L−1 as Cl2) and HOBr (MQL by GC-MS = 30 nmol L−1 = 2 μg L−1 as Cl2), respectively. Moreover, TMB derivatization was efficacious for quantifying active halogenating agents in drinking water, pool water, chlorinated surface waters, and simulated spa waters treated with 1-bromo-3-chloro-5,5-dimethylhydantoin. TMB was also used to quantify bromide as a trace impurity in 20 nominally bromide-free reagents (following oxidation of bromide by HOCl to HOBr). Several possible interferents were tested, and iodide was identified as impeding accurate quantitation of HOCl and HOBr. Overall, compared to the DPD method, TMB can provide lower MQLs, larger linear ranges, and selectivity between HOCl and HOBr.

14 December 2022 in Journal of Chromatography Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Ryan Patrick DiasRyan Patrick Dias
Ryan Patrick Dias
TJTrevor A. Johnson
Trevor A. Johnson
LFL.FElipe V. Ferrão
L.FElipe V. Ferrão
PMPatricio R. Munoz
Patricio R. Munoz
AMA. Paulina de la Mata
A. Paulina de la Mata
James HarynukJames Harynuk
James Harynuk