Water-soluble dietary fiber is primarily a substrate for degradation of short chain fatty acids (SCFAs), particularly butyric acid, by gut microbiota. SCFAs have beneficial effects on the whole body. However, epidemiological studies on the association between water-soluble dietary fiber from daily food intake and butyric acid-producing bacteria are inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to determine the association between levels of water-soluble dietary fiber from daily food intake and gut microbiota, particularly butyric acid producers, in middle-aged and older adults in a rural area in Japan. We examined the effects of water-soluble dietary fiber intake on gut microbiota after adjusting for confounding factors. After propensity score matching, 520 subjects (260 in the low-intake group and 260 in the high-intake group) were selected. One year later after a follow-up survey, we re-classified the participants and again compared low- and high-intake groups. As a result, people with a high intake had a higher relative abundance of butyric acid-producing bacteria. It was also revealed that butyric acid-producing bacteria remained high in the group that maintained high intake the next year. We concluded that continuous intake of water-soluble dietary fiber from daily food is necessary to maintain sufficient amounts of butyric acid-producing bacteria.

Recently, the importance of achieving clinical and deep remissions with mucosal healing (MH) has been demonstrated as a therapeutic goal to avoid Crohn’s disease (CD) surgical operations. Although ileocolonoscopy (CS) is considered the gold standard, there are increasing reports on the benefits of capsule endoscopy (CE) and serum leucine-rich α2-glycoprotein (LRG) for evaluating small-bowel lesions in CD. We evaluated the data of 20 patients with CD who underwent CE in our department between July 2020 and June 2021 and whose serum LRG level was measured within 2 months. Concerning the mean LRG value, there was no significant difference between the CS-MH and CS-non-MH groups. Conversely, the mean LRG level was 10.0 μg/mL in seven patients in the CE-MH group and 15.2 μg/mL in 11 patients in the CE-non-MH group with a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.0025). This study’s findings show that CE can sufficiently determine total MH in most cases, and LRG is useful for evaluating CD small-bowel MH because of its correlation with CE-MH. Furthermore, satisfying CS-MH criteria and a cut-off value of 13.4 μg/mL for LRG suggests its usefulness as a CD small-bowel MH marker, which could be incorporated into the treat-to-target strategy.

Esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is considered to be more complex than gastric ESD. This study aimed to assess the physical invasiveness of esophageal ESD during perioperative periods by measuring resting energy expenditure (REE). The factors affecting REE that could be used to identify patients requiring perioperative management were also investigated. Overall, 75 patients who had undergone esophageal ESD were prospectively enrolled. REE, body weight, and basal energy expenditure were measured on the day of and the day following ESD. The mean REE/body weight was 20.2 kcal/kg/day on the day of ESD and significantly increased to 23.0 kcal/kg/day one day after ESD. The stress factor on the day after ESD was 1.11. White blood cell, neutrophil, and C-reactive protein levels increased on the day after ESD and correlated with the changes in REE. Among the factors including age, body mass index, total resection area, operation time, and sarcopenia, only the total resection area was associated with changes in REE. In conclusion, energy metabolism increases during the perioperative period for esophageal ESD. The increase in the stress factor for esophageal ESD was higher than that in gastric and colorectal ESD. Furthermore, patients with large resection areas require greater attention in perioperative management.

Functional dyspepsia is distinguishable from Helicobacter pylori-associated dyspepsia. However, distinguishing H. pylori-associated dyspepsia from functional dyspepsia before H. pylori eradication is difficult. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to investigate whether serum pepsinogen levels before H. pylori eradication are associated with the amelioration of dyspepsia after successful H. pylori eradication. Additionally, we examined the usefulness of serum pepsinogen levels and other factors in predicting dyspepsia outcomes. H. pylori eradication was effective in 14 patients (Responders) and ineffective in 19 patients (Non-responders). The pepsinogen I/II ratio in Responders (3.4 ± 1.2) and Non-responders (2.3 ± 1.0) differed significantly (p = 0.006). The optimal cut-off pepsinogen I/II value was 2.3. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the adjusted odds ratio for Non-responders was 26.1 (95% confidence interval: 2.0–338.0, p = 0.012) for a pepsinogen I/II ratio ≤ 2.3 and 8.10 (95% confidence interval: 1.1–57.6, p = 0.037) for smoking habits. The pepsinogen I/II ratio and smoking habits were associated with the effects of H. pylori eradication on dyspeptic symptoms. Thus, the pepsinogen I/II ratio cut-off value can be used to identify patients likely to respond to H. pylori eradication after the resolution of dyspeptic symptoms.