Saqib Javed

Prof. Dr. Saqib Javed

Lund University
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2021 in Energy and Buildings
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CZChen Zhang
Chen Zhang
OKOngun Berk Kazanci
Ongun Berk Kazanci
RLRonnen Levinson
Ronnen Levinson
PHPer Heiselberg
Per Heiselberg
BOBjarne W. Olesen
Bjarne W. Olesen
GZGuoqiang Zhang
Guoqiang Zhang

1 November 2016 in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PBPeter Bourne-Webb
Peter Bourne-Webb
SBSebastien Burlon
Sebastien Burlon
Saqib JavedSaqib Javed
Saqib Javed
SKSylvia Kürten
Sylvia Kürten
FLFleur Loveridge
Fleur Loveridge

1 February 2017 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Saqib JavedSaqib Javed
Saqib Javed
JSJeffrey Spitler
Jeffrey Spitler

3 December 2017 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AVAna Vieira
Ana Vieira
MPMaria Alberdi Pagola
Maria Alberdi Pagola
Paul ChristodoulidesPaul Christodoulides
Paul Christodoulides
Saqib JavedSaqib Javed
Saqib Javed
FLFleur Loveridge
Fleur Loveridge
GRGeorgia Radioti
Georgia Radioti
Increasing use of the ground as a thermal reservoir is expected in the near future. Shallow geothermal energy (SGE) systems have proved to be sustainable alternative solutions for buildings and infrastructure conditioning in many areas across the globe in the past decades. Recently novel solutions, including energy geostructures, where SGE systems are coupled with foundation heat exchangers, have also been developed. The performance of these systems is dependent on a series of factors, among which the thermal properties of the soil play a major role. The purpose of this paper is to present, in an integrated manner, the main methods and procedures to assess ground thermal properties for SGE systems and to carry out a critical review of the methods. In particular, laboratory testing through either steady-state or transient methods are discussed and a new synthesis comparing results for different techniques is presented. In situ testing including all variations of the thermal response test is presented in detail, including a first comparison between new and traditional approaches. The issue of different scales between laboratory and in situ measurements is then analysed in detail. Finally, the thermo-hydro-mechanical behaviour of soil is introduced and discussed. These coupled processes are important for confirming the structural integrity of energy geostructures, but routine methods for parameter determination are still lacking.

1 March 2020 in Renewable Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Konstantinos P. TsagarakisKonstantinos P. Tsagarakis
Konstantinos P. Tsagarakis
LELoukia Efthymiou
Loukia Efthymiou
AMApostolos Michopoulos
Apostolos Michopoulos
Amaryllis MavraganiAmaryllis Mavragani
Amaryllis Mavragani
AAAleksandar Andjelkovic
Aleksandar Andjelkovic
BŽBojan Žlender
Bojan Žlender

1 February 2016 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJeffrey D. Spitler
Jeffrey D. Spitler
Saqib JavedSaqib Javed
Saqib Javed
RRRandi Kalskin Ramstad
Randi Kalskin Ramstad