Choi JW, et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Sep;31(9):1485-1490. http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2016.31.9.1485

Glucocorticoid preparations, adreno-cortical steroids, with strong anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects, are widely used for treating various diseases. The number of patients exposed to steroid therapy prior to surgery is increasing. When these patients present for surgery, the anesthesiologist must decide whether to administer perioperative steroid supplementation. Stress-dose glucocorticoid administration is required during the perioperative period because of the possibility of failure of cortisol secretion to cope with the increased cortisol requirement due to surgical stress, adrenal insufficiency, hemodynamic instability, and the possibility of adrenal crisis. Therefore, glucocorticoids should be supplemented at the same level as that of normal physiological response to surgical stress by evaluating the invasiveness of surgery and inhibition of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis. Various textbooks and research articles recommend the stress-dose of glucocorticoids during perioperative periods. It has been commonly suggested that glucocorticoids should be administered in an amount equivalent to about 100 mg of cortisol for major surgery because it induces approximately 5 times the normal secretion. However, more studies, with appropriate power, regarding the administration of stress-dose glucocorticoids are still required, and evaluation of patients with possible adrenal insufficiency and appropriate glucocorticoid administration based on surgical stress will help improve the prognosis.

The aim of this study was to investigate the optimum dosage of dexmedetomidine for prevention of postanesthetic shivering. One-hundred thirty two ASA physical status I-II patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic total hysterectomy were enrolled in this randomised, placebo-controlled study. Patients were randomly allocated to receive dexmedetomidine in four groups: group S (0.9% normal saline), group D0.5 (dexmedetomidine 0.5 µg/kg), group D0.75 (dexmedetomidine 0.75 µg/kg), group D1.0 (dexmedetomidine 1.0 µg/kg). Time to extubation and tympanic temperature during and after operation were measured. Shivering was graded (0-3 scale) upon patients arrival to the PACU and every ten minutes thereafter up to forty minutes. Sedation and first rescue analgesic time at the PACU were evaluated. The incidence of shivering was significantly lower in group D0.75 and D1.0 than in group S (P < 0.05). There were significantly fewer patients with a shivering score of 2 or 3 in groups D0.75 and D1.0 than in group S (P < 0.05, P < 0.001). Extubation time was shorter in group S than in groups D0.75 and D1.0 (P < 0.05). Tympanic temperature at 40 minutes postoperatively in the recovery room was higher in group S than in the other dexmedetomidine groups (P < 0.05) Fewer patients required rescue analgesia in groups D0.75 and D1.0 than in group S (P < 0.001), and the time to rescue analgesia was longer in group D1.0 than in group S (P < 0.001). Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) at arrival in the PACU was lower in all dexmedetomidine groups than in group S (P < 0.05). Our results suggest that dexmedetomidine 0.75 or 1.0 µg/kg provides effective prophylaxis against postoperative shivering as well as an analgesic effect. Though potential for intraoperative requirement for atropine, sedation in the immediate recovery period and delayed extubation time with dexmedetomidine was noted, there were no major clinical impacts on the overall recovery from anesthesia.

What is known and objective Dexmedetomidine has been a preferred sedative for patients undergoing regional anaesthesia and is mostly administered via conventional zero‐order infusion. Recently, a pharmacokinetic‐pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model of dexmedetomidine has been published, but no external validation has been reported in clinical trials. We aimed to administer target‐controlled infusion (TCI) of dexmedetomidine at the effect‐site concentration (Ce) to patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia and investigate the relationship between dexmedetomidine Ce and the sedative effects. Methods Forty‐five patients scheduled for orthopaedic surgery received spinal anaesthesia with 0.5% bupivacaine. After confirmation of sensory block level, we initiated effect‐site TCI of dexmedetomidine using Colin's model and assessed sedation levels using the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) scale and bispectral index (BIS) with each stepwise increase in the dexmedetomidine Ce. We used a non‐linear mixed‐effects model to determine the PD relationships between the dexmedetomidine Ce and sedation level. Results The dexmedetomidine Ce associated with 50% probability (Ce₅₀) of the MOAA/S scale ≤4, 3 and 2 was 0.57, 0.89 and 1.19 ng/mL, respectively. Mean dexmedetomidine Ce when BIS decreased ≤70 was 0.99 ± 0.15 ng/mL. As dexmedetomidine Ce increased, the MOAA/S scale decreased significantly (correlation coefficient [r] = −.832, P < .0001). BIS decreased significantly with increasing dexmedetomidine Ce (r = −.811, P < .0001) and decreasing MOAA/S scale (r = .838, P < .0001). The most common side effects were hypertension (26.67%) and bradycardia (20%). What is new and conclusion We applied effect‐site TCI of dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia for the first time. Dexmedetomidine Ce correlated significantly with MOAA/S scale and BIS, and was 0.89 and 1.19 ng/mL for moderate and deep sedation, respectively.

Jeon YS, et al. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2010 Sep;59(3):203-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2010.59.3.203

Kwon SY, et al. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2015 Jun;68(3):300-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2015.68.3.300