An exemplary paradigm of how an AI can be a disruptive technological paragon via the utilization of blockchain comes straight from the world of deep learning. Data scientists have long struggled to maintain the quality of a dataset for machine learning by an AI entity. Datasets can be very expensive to purchase, as, depending on both the proper selection of the elements and the homogeneity of the data contained within, constructing and maintaining the integrity of a dataset is difficult. Blockchain as a highly secure storage medium presents a technological quantum leap in maintaining data integrity. Furthermore, blockchain’s immutability constructs a fruitful environment for creating high quality, permanent and growing datasets for deep learning. The combination of AI and blockchain could impact fields like Internet of things (IoT), identity, financial markets, civil governance, smart cities, small communities, supply chains, personalized medicine and other fields, and thereby deliver benefits to many people.

The usage of Large Language Models (LMMs) and their exponential progress has created a Cambrian Explosion in the development of new tools for almost every field of science and technology, but also presented significant concerns regarding the AI ethics and creation of sophisticated malware and phishing attacks. Moreover, several worries have arisen in the field of dataset collection and intellectual property in that many datasets may exist without the license of the respective owners. Triple-Entry Accounting (TEA) has been proposed by Ian Grigg to increase transparency, accountability, and security in financial transactions. This method expands upon the traditional double-entry accounting system, which records transactions as debits and credits in two separate ledgers, by incorporating a third ledger as an independent verifier via a digitally signed receipt. The utilization of a digital signature provides evidentiary power to the receipt, thus reducing the accounting problem to one of the presence or absence of the receipt. The integrity issues associated with double-entry accounting can be addressed by allowing the parties involved in the transaction to share the records with an external auditor. This manuscript proposes a novel methodology to apply triple-entry accounting records on a publicly accessed distributed ledger technology medium to control the queries of LLMs in order to discourage malicious acts and ensure intellectual property rights.

Most Artificial Intelligence (AI) implementations so far are based on the exploration of how the human brain is designed. Nevertheless, while significant progress is shown on specialized tasks, creating an Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) remains elusive. This manuscript proposes that instead of asking how the brain is constructed, the main question should be how it was evolved. Since neurons can be understood as intelligent agents, intelligence can be thought of as a construct of multiple agents working and evolving together as a society, within a long-term memory and evolution context. More concretely, we suggest placing Multiple Neighborhood Cellular Automata (MNCA) on a blockchain with an interaction protocol and incentives to create an AGI. Given that such a model could become a “strong” AI, we present the conjecture that this infrastructure is possible to simulate the properties of cognition as an emergent phenomenon.

Within the past five years, and as Artificial Intelligence (AI) increasingly pervades the academic and educational landscape, a delicate balance has emerged between leveraging AI’s transformative potential and safeguarding individual privacy, which needs to be carefully maintained. The preservation of user privacy entails severe financial risks via penalties for the violation of directives such as General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). This manuscript examines three neoteric approaches to data privacy protection in AI-empowered lifelong education. The first method uses Triple-Entry Accounting (TEA) together with Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT); the second method uses a transaction Merkle tree that can be used as a “proof of existence” so that the users can safeguard their personal information; and the third approach examines the advantages and disadvantages of an offline AI-tutor multimodal model that can operate without internet access. Finally, the ethical implications of deploying such technologies are critically discussed, emphasizing the necessity of achieving privacy while retaining the human factor in education.

It is a popular hypothesis for researchers worldwide that if we manage to construct a lifelike intelligence that depicts most aspects of the human brain, it will be easier for us to understand our own existence. This discussion often ends up in polemic altercations between philosophers, neuroscientists, and technologists on the definition of intelligence. It has also been a subject of interest in both academic and industrial societies, with two prominent concepts emanating at the peak of it, often as one and the same: Artificial Intelligence and Natural Intelligence. While these terms are often used interchangeably, we theorize that they represent two totally distinct and often contradictory constructs. This work aims to portray the most significant divergences between Artificial Intelligence and Natural Intelligence and find out if those can converge under the current technological advancements. We focus primarily on their accurate definitions, then their inner workings, and their potentials and limitations enumerating in the process relative sociological and ethical consequences. Finally, we show why under the current methods the probability of creating an advanced form of Artificial Intelligence is minimal.

Data management in public administration and large organizations requires policies and procedures that enable the proper use and preservation of digital archival documents.