SHINYA YAMAMOTO

Dr. SHINYA YAMAMOTO

Baylor College of Medicine
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2015 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LLLucy Liu
Lucy Liu
KZKe Zhang
Ke Zhang
HSHector Sandoval
Hector Sandoval
SHINYA YAMAMOTOSHINYA YAMAMOTO
SHINYA YAMAMOTO
MJManish Jaiswal
Manish Jaiswal
HBHugo J. Bellen
Hugo J. Bellen

1 September 2014 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SHINYA YAMAMOTOSHINYA YAMAMOTO
SHINYA YAMAMOTO
MJManish Jaiswal
Manish Jaiswal
WCWu-Lin Charng
Wu-Lin Charng
TGTomasz Gambin
Tomasz Gambin
EKEnder Karaca
Ender Karaca
HBHugo J. Bellen
Hugo J. Bellen

22 March 2018 in eLife
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PLPei-Tseng Lee
Pei-Tseng Lee
JZJonathan Zirin
Jonathan Zirin
OKOguz Kanca
Oguz Kanca
WLWen-Wen Lin
Wen-Wen Lin
KSKaren L Schulze
Karen L Schulze
HBHugo J Bellen
Hugo J Bellen
We generated a library of ~1000 Drosophila stocks in which we inserted a construct in the intron of genes allowing expression of GAL4 under control of endogenous promoters while arresting transcription with a polyadenylation signal 3’ of the GAL4. This allows numerous applications. First, ~90% of insertions in essential genes cause a severe loss-of-function phenotype, an effective way to mutagenize genes. Interestingly, 12/14 chromosomes engineered through CRISPR do not carry second-site lethal mutations. Second, 26/36 (70%) of lethal insertions tested are rescued with a single UAS-cDNA construct. Third, loss-of-function phenotypes associated with many GAL4 insertions can be reverted by excision with UAS-flippase. Fourth, GAL4 driven UAS-GFP/RFP reports tissue and cell-type specificity of gene expression with high sensitivity. We report the expression of hundreds of genes not previously reported. Finally, inserted cassettes can be replaced with GFP or any DNA. These stocks comprise a powerful resource for assessing gene function.

29 November 2018 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KSKimberly Splinter
Kimberly Splinter
DADavid Adams
David Adams
CBCarlos A. Bacino
Carlos A. Bacino
HBHugo J. Bellen
Hugo J. Bellen
JBJonathan A. Bernstein
Jonathan A. Bernstein
EAEuan A. Ashley
Euan A. Ashley
Many patients remain without a diagnosis despite extensive medical evaluation. The Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN) was established to apply a multidisciplinary model in the evaluation of the most challenging cases and to identify the biologic characteristics of newly discovered diseases. The UDN, which is funded by the National Institutes of Health, was formed in 2014 as a network of seven clinical sites, two sequencing cores, and a coordinating center. Later, a central biorepository, a metabolomics core, and a model organisms screening center were added. We evaluated patients who were referred to the UDN over a period of 20 months. The patients were required to have an undiagnosed condition despite thorough evaluation by a health care provider. We determined the rate of diagnosis among patients who subsequently had a complete evaluation, and we observed the effect of diagnosis on medical care. A total of 1519 patients (53% female) were referred to the UDN, of whom 601 (40%) were accepted for evaluation. Of the accepted patients, 192 (32%) had previously undergone exome sequencing. Symptoms were neurologic in 40% of the applicants, musculoskeletal in 10%, immunologic in 7%, gastrointestinal in 7%, and rheumatologic in 6%. Of the 382 patients who had a complete evaluation, 132 received a diagnosis, yielding a rate of diagnosis of 35%. A total of 15 diagnoses (11%) were made by clinical review alone, and 98 (74%) were made by exome or genome sequencing. Of the diagnoses, 21% led to recommendations regarding changes in therapy, 37% led to changes in diagnostic testing, and 36% led to variant-specific genetic counseling. We defined 31 new syndromes. The UDN established a diagnosis in 132 of the 382 patients who had a complete evaluation, yielding a rate of diagnosis of 35%. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health Common Fund.)

1 June 2017 in The American Journal of Human Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JWJulia Wang
Julia Wang
RARami Al-Ouran
Rami Al-Ouran
YHYanhui Hu
Yanhui Hu
SKSeon-Young Kim
Seon-Young Kim
YWYing-Wooi Wan
Ying-Wooi Wan
ZLZhandong Liu
Zhandong Liu

31 August 2017 in Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MWMichael Wangler
Michael Wangler
SHINYA YAMAMOTOSHINYA YAMAMOTO
SHINYA YAMAMOTO
HCHsiao-Tuan Chao
Hsiao-Tuan Chao
JPJennifer E. Posey
Jennifer E. Posey
MWMonte Westerfield
Monte Westerfield
HBHugo J. Bellen
Hugo J. Bellen
Efforts to identify the genetic underpinnings of rare undiagnosed diseases increasingly involve the use of next-generation sequencing and comparative genomic hybridization methods. These efforts are limited by a lack of knowledge regarding gene function, and an inability to predict the impact of genetic variation on the encoded protein function. Diagnostic challenges posed by undiagnosed diseases have solutions in model organism research, which provides a wealth of detailed biological information. Model organism geneticists are by necessity experts in particular genes, gene families, specific organs, and biological functions. Here, we review the current state of research into undiagnosed diseases, highlighting large efforts in North America and internationally, including the Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN) (Supplemental Material, File S1) and UDN International (UDNI), the Centers for Mendelian Genomics (CMG), and the Canadian Rare Diseases Models and Mechanisms Network (RDMM). We discuss how merging human genetics with model organism research guides experimental studies to solve these medical mysteries, gain new insights into disease pathogenesis, and uncover new therapeutic strategies.