Shona Dr. Shona Pedersen

Dr. Shona Dr. Shona Pedersen

Basic Medical Science, Qatar University, Doha, Ad Dawḩah, Qatar
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

64Years (1963-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2015 in Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TLThomas Lener
Thomas Lener
MGMario Gimona
Mario Gimona
LALudwig Aigner
Ludwig Aigner
VBVerena Börger
Verena Börger
EBEdit Buzas
Edit Buzas
BGBernd Giebel
Bernd Giebel
Extracellular vesicles (EVs), such as exosomes and microvesicles, are released by different cell types and participate in physiological and pathophysiological processes. EVs mediate intercellular communication as cell‐derived extracellular signalling organelles that transmit specific information from their cell of origin to their target cells. As a result of these properties, EVs of defined cell types may serve as novel tools for various therapeutic approaches, including (a) anti‐tumour therapy, (b) pathogen vaccination, (c) immune‐modulatory and regenerative therapies and (d) drug delivery. The translation of EVs into clinical therapies requires the categorization of EV‐based therapeutics in compliance with existing regulatory frameworks. As the classification defines subsequent requirements for manufacturing, quality control and clinical investigation, it is of major importance to define whether EVs are considered the active drug components or primarily serve as drug delivery vehicles. For an effective and particularly safe translation of EV‐based therapies into clinical practice, a high level of cooperation between researchers, clinicians and competent authorities is essential. In this position statement, basic and clinical scientists, as members of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles (ISEV) and of the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) program of the European Union, namely European Network on Microvesicles and Exosomes in Health and Disease (ME‐HaD), summarize recent developments and the current knowledge of EV‐based therapies. Aspects of safety and regulatory requirements that must be considered for pharmaceutical manufacturing and clinical application are highlighted. Production and quality control processes are discussed. Strategies to promote the therapeutic application of EVs in future clinical studies are addressed.

1 March 1963 in Biochemical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JTJr Tata
Jr Tata
LEL Ernster
L Ernster
OLO Lindberg
O Lindberg
EAE Arrhenius
E Arrhenius
Shona Dr. Shona PedersenShona Dr. Shona Pedersen
Shona Dr. Shona Pedersen
RHR Hedman
R Hedman

30 April 2018 in Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CTClotilde Théry
Clotilde Théry
KWKenneth Witwer
Kenneth Witwer
Shona Dr. Shona PedersenShona Dr. Shona Pedersen
Shona Dr. Shona Pedersen

1 January 2013 in Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MJMalene Møller Jørgensen
Malene Møller Jørgensen
RBRikke Bæk
Rikke Bæk
Shona Dr. Shona PedersenShona Dr. Shona Pedersen
Shona Dr. Shona Pedersen
ESEvo K.L. Søndergaard
Evo K.L. Søndergaard
SKSøren R. Kristensen
Søren R. Kristensen
KVKim Varming
Kim Varming
Background: Exosomes are one of the several types of cell‐derived vesicles with a diameter of 30–100 nm. These extracellular vesicles are recognized as potential markers of human diseases such as cancer. However, their use in diagnostic tests requires an objective and high‐throughput method to define their phenotype and determine their concentration in biological fluids. To identify circulating as well as cell culture‐derived vesicles, the current standard is immunoblotting or a flow cytometrical analysis for specific proteins, both of which requires large amounts of purified vesicles.Methods: Based on the technology of protein microarray, we hereby present a highly sensitive Extracellular Vesicle (EV) Array capable of detecting and phenotyping exosomes and other extracellular vesicles from unpurified starting material in a high‐throughput manner. To only detect the exosomes captured on the EV Array, a cocktail of antibodies against the tetraspanins CD9, CD63 and CD81 was used. These antibodies were selected to ensure that all exosomes captured are detected, and concomitantly excluding the detection of other types of microvesicles.Results: The limit of detection (LOD) was determined on exosomes derived from the colon cancer cell line LS180. It clarified that supernatant from only approximately 104 cells was needed to obtain signals or that only 2.5×104 exosomes were required for each microarray spot (~1 nL). Phenotyping was performed on plasma (1–10 µL) from 7 healthy donors, which were applied to the EV Array with a panel of antibodies against 21 different cellular surface antigens and cancer antigens. For each donor, there was considerable heterogeneity in the expression levels of individual markers. The protein profiles of the exosomes (defined as positive for CD9, CD63 and CD81) revealed that only the expression level of CD9 and CD81 was approximately equal in the 7 donors. This implies questioning the use of CD63 as a standard exosomal marker since the expression level of this tetraspanin was considerably lower.

1 January 2016 in Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RVRobert Vogel
Robert Vogel
FCFrank A. W. Coumans
Frank A. W. Coumans
RMRaluca Maltesen
Raluca Maltesen
ABAnita N. Böing
Anita N. Böing
KBKatherine E. Bonnington
Katherine E. Bonnington
Shona Dr. Shona PedersenShona Dr. Shona Pedersen
Shona Dr. Shona Pedersen
Background: Understanding the pathogenic role of extracellular vesicles (EVs) in disease and their potential diagnostic and therapeutic utility is extremely reliant on in‐depth quantification, measurement and identification of EV sub‐populations. Quantification of EVs has presented several challenges, predominantly due to the small size of vesicles such as exosomes and the availability of various technologies to measure nanosized particles, each technology having its own limitations.Materials and Methods: A standardized methodology to measure the concentration of extracellular vesicles (EVs) has been developed and tested. The method is based on measuring the EV concentration as a function of a defined size range. Blood plasma EVs are isolated and purified using size exclusion columns (qEV) and consecutively measured with tunable resistive pulse sensing (TRPS). Six independent research groups measured liposome and EV samples with the aim to evaluate the developed methodology. Each group measured identical samples using up to 5 nanopores with 3 repeat measurements per pore. Descriptive statistics and unsupervised multivariate data analysis with principal component analysis (PCA) were used to evaluate reproducibility across the groups and to explore and visualise possible patterns and outliers in EV and liposome data sets.Results: PCA revealed good reproducibility within and between laboratories, with few minor outlying samples. Measured mean liposome (not filtered with qEV) and EV (filtered with qEV) concentrations had coefficients of variance of 23.9% and 52.5%, respectively. The increased variance of the EV concentration measurements could be attributed to the use of qEVs and the polydisperse nature of EVs.Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrate the feasibility of this standardized methodology to facilitate comparable and reproducible EV concentration measurements.

1 March 2002 in Protein Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MNMaria Teresa Neves-Petersen
Maria Teresa Neves-Petersen
ZGZygmunt Gryczynski
Zygmunt Gryczynski
JLJoseph Lakowicz
Joseph Lakowicz
PFPeter Fojan
Peter Fojan
Shona Dr. Shona PedersenShona Dr. Shona Pedersen
Shona Dr. Shona Pedersen
SPSesilje Petersen
Sesilje Petersen