Summary: Patients affected by lymphoid malignancies (LM) are frequently immune‐compromised, suffering increased mortality from COVID‐19. This prospective study evaluated serological and T‐cell responses after complete mRNA vaccination in 263 patients affected by chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, B‐ and T‐cell lymphomas and multiple myeloma. Results were compared with those of 167 healthy subjects matched for age and sex. Overall, patient seroconversion rate was 64·6%: serological response was lower in those receiving anti‐cancer treatments in the 12 months before vaccination: 55% vs 81·9% (P < 0·001). Anti‐CD20 antibody plus chemotherapy treatment was associated with the lowest seroconversion rate: 17·6% vs. 71·2% (P < 0·001). In the multivariate analysis conducted in the subgroup of patients on active treatment, independent predictors for seroconversion were: anti‐CD20 treatment (P < 0·001), aggressive B‐cell lymphoma diagnosis (P = 0·002), and immunoglobulin M levels <40 mg/dl (P = 0·030). The T‐cell response was evaluated in 99 patients and detected in 85 of them (86%). Of note, 74% of seronegative patients had a T‐cell response, but both cellular and humoral responses were absent in 13·1% of cases. Our findings raise some concerns about the protection that patients with LM, particularly those receiving anti‐CD20 antibodies, may gain from vaccination. These patients should strictly maintain all the protective measures.

Purpose: In clinical trials, the expansion and persistence of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells correlate with therapeutic efficacy. However, properties of CAR T cells that enable their in vivo proliferation have still to be consistently defined and the role of CAR T bag content has never been investigated in a real-life setting. Experimental Design: Residual cells obtained after washing 61 anti-CD19 CAR T product bags were analyzed to identify tisagenlecleucel/Tisa-cel and axicabtagene ciloleucel/Axi-cel phenotypic features associated with postinfusion CAR T-cell in vivo expansion and with response and survival. Results: While Tisa-cel was characterized by a significant enrichment in CAR+CD4+ T cells with central memory (P < 0.005) and effector (P < 0.005) phenotypes and lower rates of CAR+CD8+ with effector memory (P < 0.005) and naïve-like (P < 0.05) phenotypes as compared with Axi-cel, the two products displayed similar expansion kinetics. In vivo CAR T-cell expansion was influenced by the presence of CAR T with a CD8+ T central memory signature (P < 0.005) in both Tisa-cel and Axi-cel infusion products and was positively associated with response and progression-free survival (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Our data indicate that despite the great heterogeneity of Tisa-cel and Axi-cel products, the differentiation status of the infused cells mediates CAR T-cell in vivo proliferation that is necessary for antitumor response.

Purpose: Inflammatory biomarkers and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are associated with prognosis in several tumors. Data on sarcomas are limited, and insufficient on retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). Experimental Design: Patients with primary RPS operated between 2002 and 2016 were included. Hemoglobin, monocytes, NLR, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were retrieved and analyzed both individually and combined into a prognostic index (IBPI). Correlation with clinicopathologic variables was studied, as well as postoperative morbidity according to NLR and IBPI risk categories. The association between overall survival (OS) and biomarkers and, in addition, the 7-year Sarculator-predicted OS probability (pOS) was analyzed using univariable and multivariable Cox models. Results: 423/463 patients had complete data. The median follow-up was 84 months. The median NLR was 3.3 (IQR, 2.4–4.7), with significant variation across histologies. NLR was the only biomarker that independently predicted OS (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.03–1.40; P = 0.02). The IBPI showed good discrimination for subgroups at different OS (log-rank test P < 0.0001). The Cox model for pOS alone showed a 7-year index of prediction accuracy of 26.9, which increased to 29.5 when IBPI was added to pOS as a complementary prognostic tool. IBPI was also associated with the risk of serious infectious postoperative complications (P = 0.0094; noninfectious complications, P = 0.6463). Conclusions: NLR was an independent prognostic factor for OS in RPS. When combined into a prognostic index with hemoglobin, monocytes, and PLR, it serves as a readily available prognostic tool addressing tumor-related inflammation and helps in classifying RPS risk in addition to the Sarculator nomogram.

CD19–directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells can induce durable remissions in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphomas (R/R LBCLs), but 60% of patients do not respond or relapse. Biological mechanisms explaining lack of response are emerging, but they are largely unsuccessful in predicting disease response at the patient level. Additionally, to maximize the cost-effectiveness of CAR T-cell therapy, biomarkers able to predict response and survival before CAR T-cell manufacturing would be desirable. We performed transcriptomic and functional evaluations of leukapheresis products in 95 patients with R/R LBCL enrolled in a prospective observational study, to identify correlates of response and survival to tisagenlecleucel and axicabtagene ciloleucel. A signature composed of 4 myeloid genes expressed by T cells isolated from leukapheresis products is able to identify patients with a very short progression-free survival (PFS), highlighting the impact of monocytes in CAR T-cell therapy response. Accordingly, response and PFS were also negatively influenced by high circulating absolute monocyte counts at the time of leukapheresis. The combined evaluation of peripheral blood monocytes at the time of leukapheresis and the 4-gene signature represents a novel tool to identify patients with R/R LBCL at very high risk of progression after CAR T-cell therapy and could be used to plan trials evaluating CAR T cells vs other novel treatments or allogeneic CAR T cells. However, it also highlights the need to incorporate monocyte depletion strategies for better CAR T production.

This real-world prospective observational study across 21 Italian centers (CART-SIE) compares axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) outcomes in 485 patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma with baseline characteristics matched by stabilized inverse propensity score weighting. Axi-cel versus tisa-cel had higher all-grade cytokine release syndrome (78.6% vs. 89.3%, P = 0.0017) and neurotoxicity (9.9% vs. 32.2%, P < 0.0001) but also superior progression-free survival (PFS) at 1 year (46.5% vs. 34.1%, P = 0.0009). Even among patients who failed bridging therapy, axi-cel PFS was superior to tisa-cel (37.5% vs. 22.7%, P = 0.0059). Differences in overall survival and high-grade immune toxicities were not significant. The CAR-HEMATOTOX score not only predicted hematologic toxicity but also 1-year survival outcomes (51.5% in CAR-HEMATOTOX high vs. 77.2% in CAR-HEMATOTOX low, P < 0.0001). Twenty patients developed second primary malignancies, including two cases of T-cell neoplasms. These findings enable more informed selection of anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy, balancing bridging, safety, and efficacy considerations for individual patients. Significance: The findings of this study on 485 patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma treated with commercial axi-cel and tisa-cel indicate axi-cel’s superior PFS after propensity score weighting. The predictive utility of CAR-HEMATOTOX in assessing not only toxicity but also outcomes across both CAR T-cell products may guide future risk-stratified management strategies.