Silvia Mancini

Mrs. Silvia Mancini

Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Meldola, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2017 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DPDonella Puliti
Donella Puliti
LBLauro Bucchi
Lauro Bucchi
SMSilvia Mancini
Silvia Mancini
EPEugenio Paci
Eugenio Paci
SBSusanna Baracco
Susanna Baracco
GMG. Monticelli
G. Monticelli

15 March 2013 in Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FFFlavia Foca
Flavia Foca
SMSilvia Mancini
Silvia Mancini
LBLauro Bucchi
Lauro Bucchi
DPDonella Puliti
Donella Puliti
MZMarco Zappa
Marco Zappa
TGthe IMPACT Working Group
the IMPACT Working Group
BACKGROUND: After the introduction of a mammography screening program, the incidence of late‐stage breast cancer is expected to decrease. The objective of the current study was to evaluate variations in the total incidence of breast cancer and in the incidence of breast cancers with a pathologic tumor (pT) classification of pT2 through pT4 after the introduction of mammography screening in 6 Italian administrative regions.METHODS: The study area included 700 municipalities, with a total population of 692,824 women ages 55 to 74 years, that were targeted by organized mammography screening between 1991 and 2005. The year screening started at the municipal level (year 1) was identified. The years of screening were numbered from 1 to 8. The ratio of the observed 2‐year, age‐standardized (Europe) incidence rate to the expected rate (the incidence rate ratio [IRR]) was calculated. Expected rates were estimated assuming that the incidence of breast cancer was stable and was equivalent to that in the last 3 years before year 1.RESULTS: The study was based on a total of 14,447 incident breast cancers, including 4036 pT2 through pT4 breast cancers. The total IRR was 1.35 (95% confidence interval, 1.03‐1.41) in years 1 and 2, 1.16 (95% confidence interval, 1.10‐1.21) in years 3 and 4, 1.14 (95% confidence interval, 1.08‐1.20) in years 5 and 6, and 1.14 (95% confidence interval, 1.08‐1.21) in years 7 and 8. The IRR for pT2 through pT4 breast cancers was 0.97 (95% confidence interval, 0.90‐1.04) in years 1 and 2, 0.81 (95% confidence interval, 0.75‐0.88) in years 3 and 4, 0.79 (95% confidence interval, 0.73‐0.87) in years 5 and 6, and 0.71 (95% confidence interval, 0.64‐0.79) in years 7 and 8.CONCLUSIONS: A significant and stable decrease in the incidence of late‐stage breast cancer was observed from the third year of screening onward, when the IRR varied between 0.81 and 0.71. Cancer 2013;119:2022–2028. © 2013 American Cancer Society.

1 June 2015 in Preventive Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DSDiego Serraino
Diego Serraino
AGAndrea Gini
Andrea Gini
MTMartina Taborelli
Martina Taborelli
GRGuglielmo Ronco
Guglielmo Ronco
PRPaolo Giorgi Rossi
Paolo Giorgi Rossi
NPN. Pintori
N. Pintori

17 August 2020 in International Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LBLauro Bucchi
Lauro Bucchi
SMSilvia Mancini
Silvia Mancini
Emanuele CrocettiEmanuele Crocetti
Emanuele Crocetti
LMLuigino DAL MASO
Luigino DAL MASO
FBFlavia Baldacchini
Flavia Baldacchini
TGthe Italian Melanoma Intergroup and the AIRTUM Working Group
the Italian Melanoma Intergroup and the AIRTUM Working Group

20 April 2022 in British Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LBLauro Bucchi
Lauro Bucchi
SMSilvia Mancini
Silvia Mancini
FBFlavia Baldacchini
Flavia Baldacchini
ARAlessandra Ravaioli
Alessandra Ravaioli
OGOrietta Giuliani
Orietta Giuliani
FFFabio Falcini
Fabio Falcini
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a biennial faecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening programme in reducing annual colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence in its dynamic target population.Methods: The target population included over 1,000,000 persons aged 50–69 living in a region of northern Italy. The average annual response rate to invitation was 51.4%. Each observed annual age-standardised (Europe) rate per 100,000 persons between 2005, the year of introduction of the programme, and 2016 was compared with each expected annual rate as estimated with age-period-cohort (men) and age-period (women) models.Results: For both sexes, the rates observed in 1997–2004 and those expected in 2005–2016 were stable. Observed rates increased in 2005, peaked in 2006 (the first full year of screening), dropped significantly below the expected level in 2009, and continued to decrease until 2013 (the eighth full year), after which no further significant changes occurred. In the pooled years 2013–2016, the observed incidence rate per 100,000 persons was 102.2 [95% CI: 97.4, 107.1] for men, 75.6 [95% CI: 71.6, 79.7] for women and 88.4 [95% CI: 85.3, 91.5] for both sexes combined, with an observed:expected incidence rate ratio of 0.68 [95% CI: 0.65, 0.71], 0.79 [95% CI: 0.76, 0.82] and 0.72 [95% CI: 0.66, 0.81], respectively.Discussion: The study provided multiple consistent proofs of a causal relationship between the introduction of screening and a stable 28% decrease in annual CRC incidence after eight years.

18 August 2018 in International Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LBLauro Bucchi
Lauro Bucchi
FBFlavia Baldacchini
Flavia Baldacchini
SMSilvia Mancini
Silvia Mancini
ARAlessandra Ravaioli
Alessandra Ravaioli
OGOrietta Giuliani
Orietta Giuliani
OEOn Behalf Of The Emilia‐Romagna Region Workgroup For Cervical Screening Evaluation
On Behalf Of The Emilia‐Romagna Region Workgroup For Cervical Screening Evaluation