Soroosh Sorooshian

Prof. Soroosh Sorooshian

University of California, Irvine
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

47Years (1980-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 1994 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JQJ. Qi
J. Qi
ACabdelghani chehbouni
abdelghani chehbouni
Alfredo R HueteAlfredo R Huete
Alfredo R Huete
Yann KERRYann KERR
Yann KERR
Soroosh SorooshianSoroosh Sorooshian
Soroosh Sorooshian

1 April 1992 in Water Resources Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
QingYun DuanQingYun Duan
QingYun Duan
Soroosh SorooshianSoroosh Sorooshian
Soroosh Sorooshian
VGVijai Gupta
Vijai Gupta

5 January 2018 in Reviews of Geophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
QSQiaohong Sun
Qiaohong Sun
CMChiyuan Miao
Chiyuan Miao
QingYun DuanQingYun Duan
QingYun Duan
HAHamed Ashouri
Hamed Ashouri
Soroosh SorooshianSoroosh Sorooshian
Soroosh Sorooshian
KHKuo‐Lin Hsu
Kuo‐Lin Hsu
In this paper, we present a comprehensive review of the data sources and estimation methods of 30 currently available global precipitation data sets, including gauge‐based, satellite‐related, and reanalysis data sets. We analyzed the discrepancies between the data sets from daily to annual timescales and found large differences in both the magnitude and the variability of precipitation estimates. The magnitude of annual precipitation estimates over global land deviated by as much as 300 mm/yr among the products. Reanalysis data sets had a larger degree of variability than the other types of data sets. The degree of variability in precipitation estimates also varied by region. Large differences in annual and seasonal estimates were found in tropical oceans, complex mountain areas, northern Africa, and some high‐latitude regions. Overall, the variability associated with extreme precipitation estimates was slightly greater at lower latitudes than at higher latitudes. The reliability of precipitation data sets is mainly limited by the number and spatial coverage of surface stations, the satellite algorithms, and the data assimilation models. The inconsistencies described limit the capability of the products for climate monitoring, attribution, and model validation.

1 April 1999 in Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HGHoshin Gupta
Hoshin Gupta
Soroosh SorooshianSoroosh Sorooshian
Soroosh Sorooshian
PYPatrice Ogou Yapo
Patrice Ogou Yapo
The usefulness of a hydrologic model depends on how well the model is calibrated. Therefore, the calibration procedure must be conducted carefully to maximize the reliability of the model. In general, manual procedures for calibration can be extremely time-consuming and frustrating, and this has been a major factor inhibiting the widespread use of the more sophisticated and complex hydrologic models. A global optimization algorithm entitled shuffled complex evolution recently was developed that has proved to be consistent, effective, and efficient in locating the globally optimal model parameters of a hydrologic model. In this paper, the capability of the shuffled complex evolution automatic procedure is compared with the interactive multilevel calibration multistage semiautomated method developed for calibration of the Sacramento soil moisture accounting streamflow forecasting model of the U.S. National Weather Service. The results suggest that the state of the art in automatic calibration now can be exp...

1 March 1993 in Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
QingYun DuanQingYun Duan
QingYun Duan
VGV. K. Gupta
V. K. Gupta
Soroosh SorooshianSoroosh Sorooshian
Soroosh Sorooshian

1 June 1994 in Journal of Hydrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
QingYun DuanQingYun Duan
QingYun Duan
Soroosh SorooshianSoroosh Sorooshian
Soroosh Sorooshian
VGVijai K. Gupta
Vijai K. Gupta