Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) affects multiple cognitive domains, including impaired attention, hyperactivity, and increased impulsivity. According to the CDC, 9.4% of children between 2 and 17 years old have been diagnosed with ADHD. Neurotransmitters such as noradrenaline and dopamine have been suggested as crucial players in the pathophysiology of ADHD and are often targets of modern medication. Adenosine receptors types A1 and A2a in the brain are inhibited by caffeine: a stimulant known to augment attention by increasing cholinergic and dopaminergic transmission. The cognitive function of attention is also enhanced by the amino acid: L-theanine. The mechanism of action is that it behaves like a glutamate reuptake inhibitor while also acting in the hippocampus as a competitive low-affinity glutamate receptor antagonist. It’s also shown to have a neuroprotective effect by its action on the gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA)-A receptors. Our systematic review investigates the literature and clinical trials on the cognitive-enhancing effects of caffeine and L-theanine.

Current pharmacological options for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) are not disease-specific; while it treats symptoms, mavacamten targets the underlying pathology. We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of mavacamten, a first-in-class cardiac myosin inhibitor, in symptomatic obstructive HCM. This systematic review of the literature followed the PRISMA guidelines. Title/abstract and topics were searched using the following term: "mavacamten". The electronic research literature databases included the Cochrane Library, MedLine, and clinicaltrials.gov from July to August 2022. Primary efficacy endpoint was to assess clinical response at the end of treatment compared with baseline, defined as, at least one New York Heart Association (NYHA) class reduction. Two secondary endpoints from baseline were determined. The first was defined as improvement in mixed venous oxygen pressure (pVO₂). The second was defined as reduction of the post-exercise left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient. We included in our analyses data from four studies that met our review eligibility criteria. There were three randomised placebo-controlled clinical trials and one non-randomised open-label clinical trial. All four studies showed a reduction in NYHA class from mavacamten use. Three out of four studies demonstrated >1 NYHA functional class improvement ranging from 34% to 80%, while only one study showed a smaller percentage of patients remaining at class 3. Three out of four studies measured pVO₂ as an outcome, and all three studies noticed an increase in peak oxygen consumption after mavacamten treatment. Additionally, three out of four studies measured post-exercise LVOT gradient reduction as an outcome and all three found significant reduction in the post-exercise LVOT gradient after treatment. The most commonly observed adverse side effects were atrial fibrillation and decreased left ventricular ejection fraction, but all participants recovered without long-term sequelae and only one patient dropped out of the trial. Mavacamten has a greater efficacy than placebo in the treatment of HCM. It also showed promising tolerability and efficacy profiles in the treatment of HCM in adults. The three endpoints used in the evaluation of studies were reduction in NYHA class, increase in pVO₂, and post-exercise LVOT gradient reduction. Mavacamten showed greater reduction in NYHA, larger effects on increase of pVO₂, and significant reduction of the LVOT gradient. Mavacamten was also found to be well tolerated, like the placebo. The side effect profile was limited for the majority of individuals taking mavacamten. In the future, authors recommended dose-optimisation studies, and studies that evaluate mavacamten both in comparison to, and in conjunction with other current treatments.

Parinaud’s syndrome involves dysfunction of the structures of the dorsal midbrain. We investigated the pathophysiology related to the signs and symptoms to better understand the symptoms of Parinaud’s syndrome: diplopia, blurred vision, visual field defects, ptosis, squint, and ataxia, and Parinaud’s main signs of upward gaze paralysis, upper eyelid retraction, convergence retraction nystagmus (CRN), and pseudo-Argyll Robertson pupils. In upward gaze palsy, three structures are disrupted: the rostral interstitial nucleus of the medial longitudinal fasciculus (riMLF), interstitial nucleus of Cajal (iNC), and the posterior commissure. In CRN, there is a continuous discharge of the medial rectus muscle because of the lack of inhibition of supranuclear fibers. In Collier’s sign, the posterior commissure and the iNC are mainly involved. In the vicinity of the iNC, there are two essential groups of cells, the M-group cells and central caudal nuclear (CCN) group cells, which are important for vertical gaze, and eyelid control. Overstimulation of the M group of cells and increased firing rate of the CCN group causing eyelid retraction. External compression of the posterior commissure, and pretectal area causes pseudo-Argyll Robertson pupils. Pseudo-Argyll Robertson pupils constrict to accommodation and have a slight response to light (miosis) as opposed to Argyll Robertson pupils were there is no response to a light stimulus. In Parinaud’s syndrome patients conserve a slight response to light because an additional pathway to a pupillary light response that involves attention to a conscious bright/dark stimulus. Diplopia is mainly due to involvement of the trochlear nerve (IVth cranial nerve. Blurry vision is related to accommodation problems, while the visual field defects are a consequence of chronic papilledema that causes optic neuropathy. Ptosis in Parinaud’s syndrome is caused by damage to the oculomotor nerve, mainly the levator palpebrae portion. We did not find a reasonable explanation for squint. Finally, ataxia is caused by compression of the superior cerebellar peduncle.

Locked-in syndrome (LIS) is a neurological disorder in which there is damage to the ventral pons and caudal midbrain. An ischemic cause, such as basilar artery occlusion, can often lead to LIS. LIS has three subtypes: classical, partial, and total. There is loss of motion in the four extremities in classical LIS, loss of horizontal gaze, and aphasia. In partial LIS, the patient still has some motor function. Complete LIS has the worst outcome because patients cannot blink or have vertical gaze, thus rendering them incapable of communicating. Most cases of LIS occur due to ischemic infarcts. These patients require a great deal of physical rehabilitation to regain partial motor ability and a means to communicate. While the clinical features and pathophysiology are known, the prognosis and long-term treatment remain unknown. We conducted a systematic review using the Meta-Analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) protocol. We use an advanced PubMed strategy using the inclusion criteria of observational studies or clinical trials conducted in the last 20 years, written in English, and conducted on humans. We excluded systematic reviews, literature reviews, metanalysis, and studies that did not meet the outcomes of our objectives. The prognosis of LIS is not good, and most patients remain locked in, with poor quality of life, especially motor functions. Respiratory failure and depression are big comorbidities. In the acute setting, patients benefit from rapid intervention. The subacute treatment needs to manage aggressively to improve functional scores best. The long-term treatment focus is on the quality of life and managing comorbidities.

Human African trypanosomiasis (HAT), or sleeping sickness disease, is an infection caused mainly by Trypanosoma brucei gambiense-human African trypanosomiasis (g-HAT) and is transmitted by tsetse flies. The disease goes through two stages: hemolymphatic and meningo-encephalic phases. The treatment for the second stage has changed from melarsoprol or eflornithine to nifurtimox-eflornithine combination therapy (NECT) and fexinidazole. We aimed to systematically review the literature on the efficacy and toxicity of fexinidazole and NECT. We used PubMed advanced strategy and Google Scholar databases, including clinical trials and observational studies on humans in the last 20 years in the English literature. Applying the inclusion/exclusion criteria, we reviewed eight studies. We used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) protocol. For assessing bias, we used the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for risk assessment of the clinical trials and the Robins-I tool for the observational studies. Overall, the clinical trials showed that NECT was non-inferior to eflornithine. The proportion of patients discharged alive is higher in patients treated with NECT vs. patients treated with eflornithine. Gastrointestinal complaints are a common side effect of NECT therapy, while fearful but relatively rare convulsions can also occur. The main limitation among the studies of NECT was the lack of blinding because most of them were open-label. Fexinidazole, the new oral medication showed is effective and safe for the treatment of g-HAT infection. Because of their convenience, fexinidazole is preferred over NECT therapy, oral vs. IV infusion in the first and second stages of the disease. Compared to older therapies, fexinidazole and NECT are more effective and safer than eflornithine and melarsoprol monotherapy.

Erdheim Chester disease (ECD) is a type of histiocytosis characterized by a variable clinical presentation. The treatment of ECD is complex and mainly unknown. We aim to conduct a literature review of the treatment of ECD and consolidate the knowledge about the most recent and updated treatment for ECD. To conduct the systematic review, we used the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) protocol. To analyze the bias, we used the Cochrane collaboration risk-of-bias tool to assess the bias. We included observational studies and clinical trials on humans, which were written in English. Papers not fulfilling the objective of our study were excluded. Overall, the drug showed efficacy in the clinical trials, showing prolonged improvement and high rates of response rate. Overall, the drug was not well tolerated, and patients had a long list of side effects. Nevertheless, the drug seems to be a good option for second-line treatment for patients with ECD and BRAFV600 mutation.