Steve Harwin

Dr. Steve Harwin

Geography, Planning and Spatial Science, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 May 2012 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Steve HarwinSteve Harwin
Steve Harwin
ALArko Lucieer
Arko Lucieer
Sensor miniaturisation, improved battery technology and the availability of low-cost yet advanced Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) have provided new opportunities for environmental remote sensing. The UAV provides a platform for close-range aerial photography. Detailed imagery captured from micro-UAV can produce dense point clouds using multi-view stereopsis (MVS) techniques combining photogrammetry and computer vision. This study applies MVS techniques to imagery acquired from a multi-rotor micro-UAV of a natural coastal site in southeastern Tasmania, Australia. A very dense point cloud ( < 1–3 cm point spacing) is produced in an arbitrary coordinate system using full resolution imagery, whereas other studies usually downsample the original imagery. The point cloud is sparse in areas of complex vegetation and where surfaces have a homogeneous texture. Ground control points collected with Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS) are identified and used for georeferencing via a Helmert transformation. This study compared georeferenced point clouds to a Total Station survey in order to assess and quantify their geometric accuracy. The results indicate that a georeferenced point cloud accurate to 25–40 mm can be obtained from imagery acquired from ~50 m. UAV-based image capture provides the spatial and temporal resolution required to map and monitor natural landscapes. This paper assesses the accuracy of the generated point clouds based on field survey points. Based on our key findings we conclude that sub-decimetre terrain change (in this case coastal erosion) can be monitored.

17 September 2015 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Steve HarwinSteve Harwin
Steve Harwin
ALArko Lucieer
Arko Lucieer
JOJonathan Osborn
Jonathan Osborn
In unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetric surveys, the cameracan be pre-calibrated or can be calibrated "on-the-job" using structure-from-motion anda self-calibrating bundle adjustment. This study investigates the impact on mapping accuracyof UAV photogrammetric survey blocks, the bundle adjustment and the 3D reconstructionprocess under a range of typical operating scenarios for centimetre-scale natural landformmapping (in this case, a coastal cliff). We demonstrate the sensitivity of the process tocalibration procedures and the need for careful accuracy assessment. For this investigation, vertical (nadir or near-nadir) and oblique photography were collected with 80%–90%overlap and with accurately-surveyed (σ ≤ 2 mm) and densely-distributed ground control.This allowed various scenarios to be tested and the impact on mapping accuracy to beassessed. This paper presents the results of that investigation and provides guidelines thatwill assist with operational decisions regarding camera calibration and ground control forUAV photogrammetry. The results indicate that the use of either a robust pre-calibration ora robust self-calibration results in accurate model creation from vertical-only photography,and additional oblique photography may improve the results. The results indicate thatif a dense array of high accuracy ground control points are deployed and the UAVphotography includes both vertical and oblique images, then either a pre-calibration or anon-the-job self-calibration will yield reliable models (pre-calibration RMSEXY = 7.1 mmand on-the-job self-calibration RMSEXY = 3.2 mm). When oblique photography was Remote Sens. 2015, 7 11934 excluded from the on-the-job self-calibration solution, the accuracy of the model deteriorated(by 3.3 mm horizontally and 4.7 mm vertically). When the accuracy of the ground controlwas then degraded to replicate typical operational practice (σ = 22 mm), the accuracyof the model further deteriorated (e.g., on-the-job self-calibration RMSEXY went from3.2–7.0 mm). Additionally, when the density of the ground control was reduced, the modelaccuracy also further deteriorated (e.g., on-the-job self-calibration RMSEXY went from7.0–7.3 mm). However, our results do indicate that loss of accuracy due to sparse groundcontrol can be mitigated by including oblique imagery.

1 August 2012 in The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Steve HarwinSteve Harwin
Steve Harwin
ALArko Lucieer
Arko Lucieer
Low-cost Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are becoming viable environmental remote sensing tools. Sensor and battery technology is expanding the data capture opportunities. The UAV, as a close range remote sensing platform, can capture high resolution photography on-demand. This imagery can be used to produce dense point clouds using multi-view stereopsis techniques (MVS) combining computer vision and photogrammetry. This study examines point clouds produced using MVS techniques applied to UAV and terrestrial photography. A multi-rotor micro UAV acquired aerial imagery from a altitude of approximately 30–40 m. The point clouds produced are extremely dense (<1–3 cm point spacing) and provide a detailed record of the surface in the study area, a 70 m section of sheltered coastline in southeast Tasmania. Areas with little surface texture were not well captured, similarly, areas with complex geometry such as grass tussocks and woody scrub were not well mapped. The process fails to penetrate vegetation, but extracts very detailed terrain in unvegetated areas. Initially the point clouds are in an arbitrary coordinate system and need to be georeferenced. A Helmert transformation is applied based on matching ground control points (GCPs) identified in the point clouds to GCPs surveying with differential GPS. These point clouds can be used, alongside laser scanning and more traditional techniques, to provide very detailed and precise representations of a range of landscapes at key moments. There are many potential applications for the UAV-MVS technique, including coastal erosion and accretion monitoring, mine surveying and other environmental monitoring applications. For the generated point clouds to be used in spatial applications they need to be converted to surface models that reduce dataset size without loosing too much detail. Triangulated meshes are one option, another is Poisson Surface Reconstruction. This latter option makes use of point normal data and produces a surface representation at greater detail than previously obtainable. This study will visualise and compare the two surface representations by comparing clouds created from terrestrial MVS (T-MVS) and UAV-MVS.

6 April 2026 in Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SHSophia Hoyer
Sophia Hoyer
Anke FluhrerAnke Fluhrer
Anke Fluhrer
Florian M. HellwigFlorian M. Hellwig
Florian M. Hellwig
Steve HarwinSteve Harwin
Steve Harwin
JKJukka Matthias Krisp
Jukka Matthias Krisp
Thomas JagdhuberThomas Jagdhuber
Thomas Jagdhuber

1 January 2025
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DDDavid David
David David
Steve HarwinSteve Harwin
Steve Harwin
JKJamie Kirkpatrick
Jamie Kirkpatrick
Predictive modelling at regional scales is increasingly necessary for the conservation of threatened raptor species in landscapes that are prone to development. Here, we integrated spatial data from 73 active nest sites with habitat and environmental data to create a regional-scale nesting habitat suitability model for the endangered Grey Goshawk Tachyspiza novaehollandiae in modified landscapes of south-eastern Tasmania. Canopy height, distance to watercourse, elevation and distance to forest edge had the highest percentage contribution (cumulative contribution of 53.1%) to the model’s predictions and were therefore the best predictors of suitable nesting habitat. The model indicated that Grey Goshawk nests are more likely to occur in tall eucalypt forests, Silver Wattle Acacia dealbata and Blackwood Acacia melanoxylon forest and temperate rainforest at elevations below 200 m above sea level in areas that receive ~619–946 mm mean annual rainfall. Within these broad parameters the model indicated that nests are more likely to occur near a forest edge, near a watercourse or drainage line and in well-shaded areas with concave landforms and a south-easterly aspect. A conservative threshold (>0.5 probability of occurrence) predicted that only 92 km2 (12%) of our study area (766 km2) is suitable for nesting. This study demonstrates that Grey Goshawks, like other goshawk species, have a narrow nesting range and ecological niche. Retention of the forest types used for nesting at elevations below 450 m asl, especially in areas with concave landforms and south-easterly aspects, will be beneficial for the conservation of the Grey Goshawk population in south-eastern Tasmania. The predictive map generated by our model can be used to identify such areas