Suharni Mohamad

Dr. Suharni Mohamad

Assoc. Prof. Dr.

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 September 2021 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KSKasturi Selvam
Kasturi Selvam
Mohamad Ahmad NajibMohamad Ahmad Najib
Mohamad Ahmad Najib
MKMuhammad Fazli Khalid
Muhammad Fazli Khalid
SMSuharni Mohamad
Suharni Mohamad
FPFahreddin Palaz
Fahreddin Palaz
IAIsmail Aziah
Ismail Aziah
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has attracted public attention. The gold standard for diagnosing COVID-19 is reverse transcription–quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). However, RT-qPCR can only be performed in centralized laboratories due to the requirement for advanced laboratory equipment and qualified workers. In the last decade, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) technology has shown considerable promise in the development of rapid, highly sensitive, and specific molecular diagnostic methods that do not require complicated instrumentation. During the current COVID-19 pandemic, there has been growing interest in using CRISPR-based diagnostic techniques to develop rapid and accurate assays for detecting SARS-CoV-2. In this work, we review and summarize reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) CRISPR-based diagnostic techniques for detecting SARS-CoV-2.

3 November 2020 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NANizam Abdullah
Nizam Abdullah
FMFarah Al Marzooq
Farah Al Marzooq
SMSuharni Mohamad
Suharni Mohamad
NRNormastura Abd Rahman
Normastura Abd Rahman
KRKoippallil Rani
Koippallil Rani
LSLakshman SAMARANAYAKE
Lakshman SAMARANAYAKE
Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) is commonly used to arrest caries lesions, especially in early childhood caries. Recently, it was suggested that SDF can be combined with potassium iodide (KI) to minimize the discoloration of demineralized dentine associated with SDF application. However, the antibacterial efficacy of SDF alone or combined with KI on in-situ biofilm is unknown. Hence, we compared the anti-plaque biofilm efficacy of two different commercially available SDF solutions, with or without KI, using an in-situ biofilm, analysed using viability real-time PCR with propidium monoazide (PMA). Appliance-borne in-situ biofilm samples (n = 90) were grown for a period of 6 h in five healthy subjects who repeated the experiment on three separate occasions, using a validated, novel, intraoral device. The relative anti-biofilm efficacy of two SDF formulations; 38.0% Topamine (SDFT) and 31.3%, Riva Star (SDFR), KI alone, and KI in combination with SDFR (SDFR+KI) was compared. The experiments were performed by applying an optimized volume of the agents onto the biofilm for 1min, mimicking the standard clinical procedure. Afterwards the viability of the residual biofilm bacteria was quantified using viability real-time PCR with PMA, then the percentage of viable from total bacteria was calculated. Both SDF formulations (SDFT and SDFR) exhibited potent antibacterial activities against the in-situ biofilm; however, there was non-significant difference in their efficacy. KI alone did not demonstrate any antibacterial effect, and there was non-significant difference in the antibacterial efficacy of SDF alone compared to SDF with KI, (SDFT v SDFR/KI). Thus, we conclude that the antibacterial efficacy of SDF against plaque biofilms is not modulated by KI supplements. Viability real-time PCR with PMA was successfully used to analyze the viability of naturally grown oral biofilm; thus, the same method can be used to test the antimicrobial effect of other agents on oral biofilms in future research.

28 June 2024 in Journal of Microbiological Methods
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSSyaidatul Akmal Saifuddin
Syaidatul Akmal Saifuddin
RRRoslina Rashid
Roslina Rashid
NANurin Jazlina Nor Azmi
Nurin Jazlina Nor Azmi
SMSuharni Mohamad
Suharni Mohamad

GOGodwin Obande
Godwin Obande
ABAhmad Ibrahim Bagudo
Ahmad Ibrahim Bagudo
SMSuharni Mohamad
Suharni Mohamad
Zakuan Zainy DerisZakuan Zainy Deris
Zakuan Zainy Deris
AHAzian Harun
Azian Harun
KSKirnpal Kaur Banga Singh
Kirnpal Kaur Banga Singh
This study is a cross-sectional, observational analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic in Africa, to understand the progression of the disease across the continent. Published data on COVID-19 from 20 January 2020 to 21 June 2021 were obtained and analyzed. Case fatality ratios, as well as case growth rates and other indices were computed. On 21 June 2021, a total of 178,210,532 confirmed cases and 3,865,978 deaths had been recorded worldwide. While the Americas recorded the highest number of cases, Southern Africa recorded the majority of African cases. Fatality rate since from 20 February 2020 to 21 June 2021 was highest in the Americas (2.63%) and low in the South Eastern Asia region (1.39%), globally increasing from 2.17% at the end of January to 6.36% in May 2020 and decreasing to a range between 2.14% to 2.30% since January 2021. In Africa, the infection rate per 100,000 persons was up to 3090.18, while deaths per 100,000 and case fatality ratio were as high as 119.64 and 5.72%, respectively, among the 20 most-affected countries. The testing rate per million population was highest in Botswana (512,547.08). Fatality appears to be increasing in some regions of Africa. The rate of infection and fatality in Africa could still likely take an upward turn. Strict control measures are required, considering the continent’s weak healthcare systems.

26 December 2020 in Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FFFatin Hazwani Fauzi
Fatin Hazwani Fauzi
NHNurul Izzati Hamzan
Nurul Izzati Hamzan
NRNurhayu Ab Rahman
Nurhayu Ab Rahman
SSSiti Suraiya
Siti Suraiya
SMSuharni Mohamad
Suharni Mohamad
Worldwide there has been a significant increase in the incidence of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) etiologically attributed to oncogenic hum

1 January 2019 in Journal of Oral Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NANizam Abdullah
Nizam Abdullah
FAFarah Al-Marzooq
Farah Al-Marzooq
SMSuharni Mohamad
Suharni Mohamad
NRNormastura Abd Rahman
Normastura Abd Rahman
HNHien Chi Ngo
Hien Chi Ngo
LSLakshman Perera Samaranayake
Lakshman Perera Samaranayake
Background: Oral biofilms are the root cause of major oral diseases. As in vitro biofilms are not representative of the intraoral milieu, various devices have been manufactured over the years to develop Appliance Grown Oral Biofilm (AGOB). Objective: To review various intraoral appliances used to develop AGOB for microbiological analysis, and to judge the optimal means for such analyses. Design: Four databases (PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus and Medline) were searched by two independent reviewers, and articles featuring the key words 'device' OR 'splint' OR 'appliance'; 'Oral biofilm' OR 'dental plaque'; 'in vivo' OR 'in situ'; 'Microbiology' OR 'Bacteria' OR 'microbiome'; were included. The standard Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) were adopted for data gathering. Results: Of the 517 articles which met the initial inclusion criteria, 24 were deemed eligible for review. The age of the AGOB, sampled at various intervals, ranged from 30 min to 28 days. The most commonly used microbiome analytical methods were fluorescence microscopy, total cell count using conventional, and molecular tools including Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) platforms. Conclusions: No uniformly superior method for collecting AGOB could be discerned. NGS platforms are preferable for AGOB analyses.