Vulvar cancer is a rare gynecological malignancy. It constitutes 5–8% of all gynecologic neoplasms, and squamous cell carcinoma is the most common variant. This article aims to review the etiopathogenesis revised 2021 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification and emphasize imaging in the staging of vulvar cancer. The staging has been regulated by FIGO since 1969 and is subjected to multiple revisions. Previous 2009 FIGO classification is limited by the prognostic capability, which prompted the 2021 revisions and issue of a new FIGO classification. Although vulvar cancer can be visualized clinically, imaging plays a crucial role in the staging of the tumor, assessing the tumor extent, and planning the management. In addition, sentinel lymph node biopsy facilitates the histopathological staging of the draining lymph node, thus enabling early detection of tumor metastases and better survival rates.

Gynecologic malignancies are among the most common cancers in women worldwide and account for significant morbidity and mortality. Management and consequently overall patient survival is reliant upon early detection, accurate staging and early detection of any recurrence. Ultrasound, Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PET-CT) play an essential role in the detection, characterization, staging and restaging of the most common gynecologic malignancies, namely the cervical, endometrial and ovarian malignancies. Recent advances in imaging including functional MRI, hybrid imaging with Positron Emission Tomography (PET/MRI) contribute even more to lesion specification and overall role of imaging in gynecologic malignancies. Radiomics is a neoteric approach which aspires to enhance decision support by extracting quantitative information from radiological imaging.

Primary neuroendocrine neoplasms are a rare heterogeneous group of tumors that include well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, and paraganglioma. An extensive literature search was used to compile the data regarding epidemiology, pathogenesis, imaging features, and management of the urinary system NENs. We also included the updated staging of the NENs at various locations of the urinary system.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are relatively uncommon heterogeneous neoplasms arising from endocrine and neuronal origin cells showing highly variable clinical behavior. By the time these tumors are discovered, up to 14% of patients with histologically proven NETs have metastasis, with the liver as the most frequently affected organ. Sometimes, no known primary site can be identified via routine imaging. Neuroendocrine tumors of unknown origin carry a poorer prognosis (compared with metastatic NETs with a known primary site) because of a lack of tailored surgical intervention and appropriate medical therapy (eg, chemotherapy or targeted therapy). A multimethod approach is frequently used in the trial to accurately determine the primary site for NETs of unknown primary sites and may include clinical, laboratory, radiological, histopathological, and surgical data. New molecular techniques using the genomic approach to identify the molecular signature have shown promising results. Various imaging modalities include ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), dual-energy CT, magnetic resonance imaging, and functional and hybrid imaging (positron emission tomography/CT, positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging); somatostatin receptor imaging with new tracers is frequently used in an attempt for localization of the primary site.

Objective: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of whole-body PET/MR imaging and contrast-enhanced CT for detecting metastatic disease in patients undergoing surgical resection, using pathology as the reference standard. Materials and Methods: Nineteen patients with suspected metastatic involvement (including four who received neoadjuvant therapy before surgery) underwent both FDG PET/MR and contrast-enhanced CT scans. Imaging was reviewed for metastases at defined sites (e.g., perihepatic region, hepatic parenchyma, mesentery, bowel serosa, colon surface, and nodal basins). Findings on each modality were compared to surgical pathology results per site. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for PET/MR and CT, with pathology as the reference standard. Results: Overall, PET/MR achieved approximately 55.5% sensitivity, 89.5% specificity, 82.5% accuracy, 57.6% positive predictive value (PPV), and 88.6% negative predictive value (NPV). In contrast, CT demonstrated 75.0% sensitivity, 72.3% specificity, 72.9% accuracy, 42% PPV, and 91.5% NPV. No significant correlations were observed between semi-quantitative PET/MR measures, such as SUV or MR ADC values, and patient survival outcomes; therefore, these metrics were excluded from further analysis. Notably, PET/MR imaging findings changed clinical management in 3/6 chemotherapy patients. PET/MR demonstrated greater sensitivity in detecting nodal metastases, 75% compared to CT (25%), and identified small bowel serosal lesions in 1 of 1 case (100% sensitivity) versus none with CT. CT showed slightly higher specificity (81%) for colon serosal involvement than PET/MR (75%). Conclusions: CT demonstrates higher sensitivity, whereas PET/MR offers greater specificity and negative predictive value. When used together, the two modalities may provide a more reliable and comprehensive assessment of metastatic disease.

The incidence of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) has gradually increased over the past few decades with the majority of patients presenting with metastases on initial presentation. The liver is the most common site of initial metastatic disease, and the presence of liver metastasis is an independent prognostic factor associated with a negative outcome. Because NENs are heterogenous neoplasms with variable differentiation, grading, and risk of grade transformation over time, accurate diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine liver lesions are both important and challenging. This is particularly so with the multiple liver-directed treatment options available. In this review article, we discuss the diagnosis, treatment, and response evaluation of NEN liver metastases.