Thorsten Burandt

Dr. Thorsten Burandt

University of Flensburg, Flensburg, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2022 in Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KHKarlo Hainsch
Karlo Hainsch
KLKonstantin Löffler
Konstantin Löffler
Thorsten BurandtThorsten Burandt
Thorsten Burandt
HAHans Auer
Hans Auer
PGPedro Crespo del Granado
Pedro Crespo del Granado
SZSebastian Zwickl-Bernhard
Sebastian Zwickl-Bernhard

22 September 2017 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KLKonstantin Löffler
Konstantin Löffler
KHKarlo Hainsch
Karlo Hainsch
Thorsten BurandtThorsten Burandt
Thorsten Burandt
POPao-Yu Oei
Pao-Yu Oei
CKClaudia Kemfert
Claudia Kemfert
Claudia KemfertClaudia Kemfert
Claudia Kemfert
This paper develops a path for the global energy system up to 2050, presenting a new application of the open-source energy modeling system (OSeMOSYS) to the community. It allows quite disaggregate energy and emission analysis: Global Energy System Model (GENeSYS-MOD) uses a system of linear equations of the energy system to search for lowest-cost solutions for a secure energy supply, given externally defined constraints, mainly in terms of CO2-emissions. The general algebraic modeling system (GAMS) version of OSeMOSYS is updated to the newest version and, in addition, extended and enhanced to include e.g., a modal split for transport, an improved trading system, and changes to storages. The model can be scaled from small-scale applications, e.g., a company, to cover the global energy system. The paper also includes an application of GENeSYS-MOD to analyze decarbonization scenarios at the global level, broken down into 10 regions. Its main focus is on interdependencies between traditionally segregated sectors: electricity, transportation, and heating; which are all included in the model. Model calculations suggests that in order to achieve the 1.5–2 °C target, a combination of renewable energy sources provides the lowest-cost solution, solar photovoltaic being the dominant source. Average costs of electricity generation in 2050 are about 4 €cents/kWh (excluding infrastructure and transportation costs).


1 April 2018 in Energy Strategy Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FGFrancesco Gardumi
Francesco Gardumi
ASAbhishek Shivakumar
Abhishek Shivakumar
RMRobbie Morrison
Robbie Morrison
CTConstantinos Taliotis
Constantinos Taliotis
OBOliver Broad
Oliver Broad
TAThomas Alfstad
Thomas Alfstad

1 November 2019 in Energy Strategy Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KLKonstantin Löffler
Konstantin Löffler
Thorsten BurandtThorsten Burandt
Thorsten Burandt
KHKarlo Hainsch
Karlo Hainsch
POPao-Yu Oei
Pao-Yu Oei

2 August 2019 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HBHans-Karl Bartholdsen
Hans-Karl Bartholdsen
AEAnna Eidens
Anna Eidens
KLKonstantin Löffler
Konstantin Löffler
FSFrederik Seehaus
Frederik Seehaus
FWFelix Wejda
Felix Wejda
CHChristian von Hirschhausen
Christian von Hirschhausen
Like many other countries, Germany has defined goals to reduce its CO2-emissions following the Paris Agreement of the 21st Conference of the Parties (COP). The first successes in decarbonizing the electricity sector were already achieved under the German Energiewende. However, further steps in this direction, also concerning the heat and transport sectors, have stalled. This paper describes three possible pathways for the transformation of the German energy system until 2050. The scenarios take into account current climate politics on a global, European, and German level and also include different demand projections, technological trends and resource prices. The model includes the sectors power, heat, and transportation and works on a Federal State level. For the analysis, the linear cost-optimizing Global Energy System Model (GENeSYS-MOD) is used to calculate the cost-efficient paths and technology mixes. We find that a reduction of CO2 of more than 80% in the less ambitious scenario can be welfare enhancing compared to a scenario without any climate mitigating policies. Even higher decarbonization rates of 95% are feasible and needed to comply with international climate targets, yet related to high effort in transforming the subsector of process heat. The different pathways depicted in this paper render chances and risks of transforming the German energy system under various external influences.