Susan Teubner-Rhodes

Dr. Susan Teubner-Rhodes

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 November 2012 in Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JNJared Novick
Jared Novick
EHErika Hussey
Erika Hussey
STSusan Teubner-Rhodes
Susan Teubner-Rhodes
JHJ. Isaiah Harbison
J. Isaiah Harbison
MBMichael F. Bunting
Michael F. Bunting
How do general-purpose cognitive abilities affect language processing and comprehension? Recent research emphasises a role for cognitive control—also called executive function (EF)—when individuals must override early parsing decisions as new evidence conflicts with their developing interpretation. We tested if training on non-syntactic EF tasks improves readers' ability to recover from misanalysis during language processing. Participants completed pre/post-reading assessments containing temporarily ambiguous sentences susceptible to misinterpretation. Performance increases on a training task targeting conflict-resolution processes (n-back with “lures”) predicted improvements in garden-path recovery. N-back responders—those demonstrating reliable training gains—significantly increased their comprehension accuracy across assessments. Their posttest eye-movement patterns also revealed significantly improved real-time revision following entry into disambiguating sentence regions where cognitive control is hypothesised to engage. Untrained participants and n-back non-responders showed no performance changes. The results provide insight into how nonlinguistic functions contribute to parsing and interpretation and suggest that certain language skills are amenable to improvement via domain-general EF training.

1 July 2016 in Ear & Hearing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MEMark A. Eckert
Mark A. Eckert
STSusan Teubner-Rhodes
Susan Teubner-Rhodes
KVKenneth Vaden
Kenneth Vaden
This review examines findings from functional neuroimaging studies of speech recognition in noise to provide a neural systems level explanation for the effort and fatigue that can be experienced during speech recognition in challenging listening conditions. Neuroimaging studies of speech recognition consistently demonstrate that challenging listening conditions engage neural systems that are used to monitor and optimize performance across a wide range of tasks. These systems appear to improve speech recognition in younger and older adults, but sustained engagement of these systems also appears to produce an experience of effort and fatigue that may affect the value of communication. When considered in the broader context of the neuroimaging and decision making literature, the speech recognition findings from functional imaging studies indicate that the expected value, or expected level of speech recognition given the difficulty of listening conditions, should be considered when measuring effort and fatigue. The authors propose that the behavioral economics or neuroeconomics of listening can provide a conceptual and experimental framework for understanding effort and fatigue that may have clinical significance.

1 December 2013 in Cognition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IKIrene P. Kan
Irene P. Kan
STSusan Teubner-Rhodes
Susan Teubner-Rhodes
ADAnna B. Drummey
Anna B. Drummey
LNLauren Nutile
Lauren Nutile
LKLauren Krupa
Lauren Krupa
JNJared M. Novick
Jared M. Novick

1 May 2016 in Cognition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
STSusan Teubner-Rhodes
Susan Teubner-Rhodes
AMAlan Mishler
Alan Mishler
RCRyan Corbett
Ryan Corbett
LALlorenç Andreu
Llorenç Andreu
MSMònica Sanz-Torrent
Mònica Sanz-Torrent
JNJared M. Novick
Jared M. Novick

18 December 2015 in Experimental Aging Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KVKenneth Vaden
Kenneth Vaden
SKStefanie E. Kuchinsky
Stefanie E. Kuchinsky
JAJayne B. Ahlstrom
Jayne B. Ahlstrom
STSusan Teubner-Rhodes
Susan Teubner-Rhodes
JDJudy R. Dubno
Judy R. Dubno
MEMark A. Eckert
Mark A. Eckert
Background/Study Context: Adaptive control, reflected by elevated activity in cingulo-opercular brain regions, optimizes performance in challenging tasks by monitoring outcomes and adjusting behavior. For example, cingulo-opercular function benefits trial-level word recognition in noise for normal-hearing adults. Because auditory system deficits may limit the communicative benefit from adaptive control, we examined the extent to which cingulo-opercular engagement supports word recognition in noise for older adults with hearing loss (HL). Methods: Participants were selected to form groups with Less HL (n = 12; mean pure tone threshold, pure tone average [PTA] = 19.2 ± 4.8 dB HL [hearing level]) and More HL (n = 12; PTA = 38.4 ± 4.5 dB HL, 0.25–8 kHz, both ears). A word recognition task was performed with words presented in multitalker babble at +3 or +10 dB signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) during a sparse acquisition fMRI experiment. The participants were middle-aged and older (ages: 64.1 ± 8.4 years) English speakers with no history of neurological or psychiatric diagnoses. Results: Elevated cingulo-opercular activity occurred with increased likelihood of correct word recognition on the next trial (t(23) = 3.28, p = .003), and this association did not differ between hearing loss groups. During trials with word recognition errors, the More HL group exhibited higher blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) contrast in occipital and parietal regions compared with the Less HL group. Across listeners, more pronounced cingulo-opercular activity during recognition errors was associated with better overall word recognition performance. Conclusion: The trial-level word recognition benefit from cingulo-opercular activity was equivalent for both hearing loss groups. When speech audibility and performance levels are similar for older adults with mild to moderate hearing loss, cingulo-opercular adaptive control contributes to word recognition in noise.

1 January 2017 in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EHErika K. Hussey
Erika K. Hussey
JHJ. Isaiah Harbison
J. Isaiah Harbison
STSusan Teubner-Rhodes
Susan Teubner-Rhodes
AMAlan Mishler
Alan Mishler
KVKayla Velnoskey
Kayla Velnoskey
JNJared M. Novick
Jared M. Novick
Cognitive control refers to adjusting thoughts and actions when confronted with conflict during information processing. We tested whether this ability is causally linked to performance on certain language and memory tasks by using cognitive control training to systematically modulate people's ability to resolve information-conflict across domains. Different groups of subjects trained on 1 of 3 minimally different versions of an n-back task: n-back-with-lures (High-Conflict), n-back-without-lures (Low-Conflict), or 3-back-without-lures (3-Back). Subjects completed a battery of recognition memory and language processing tasks that comprised both high- and low-conflict conditions before and after training. We compared the transfer profiles of (a) the High- versus Low-Conflict groups to test how conflict resolution training contributes to transfer effects, and (b) the 3-Back versus Low-Conflict groups to test for differences not involving cognitive control. High-Conflict training-but not Low-Conflict training-produced discernable benefits on several untrained transfer tasks, but only under selective conditions requiring cognitive control. This suggests that the conflict-focused intervention influenced functioning on ostensibly different outcome measures across memory and language domains. 3-Back training resulted in occasional improvements on the outcome measures, but these were not selective for conditions involving conflict resolution. We conclude that domain-general cognitive control mechanisms are plastic, at least temporarily, and may play a causal role in linguistic and nonlinguistic performance. (PsycINFO Database Record