Tommy Boland

Prof. Tommy Boland

University College Dublin
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2011 in Animal Feed Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PCP. Crosson
P. Crosson
LSL. Shalloo
L. Shalloo
DOD. O’bRien
D. O’bRien
GLG.J. Lanigan
G.J. Lanigan
PFP.A. Foley
P.A. Foley
DKDavid Kenny
David Kenny

1 October 2010 in Journal of Animal Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AKA. K. Kelly
A. K. Kelly
MMM. McGee
M. McGee
DCD. H. Crews
D. H. Crews
TSTorres Sweeney
Torres Sweeney
TBTommy Boland
Tommy Boland
DKDavid Kenny
David Kenny
This study examined the relationship between feed efficiency and performance, and feeding behavior, blood metabolic variables, and various ultrasonic measurements in finishing beef heifers. Within-animal repeatability estimates of feed intake and behavior, performance, feed efficiency, ultrasonic body measures, and plasma analytes across the growing and finishing stages of the lifespan of the animal were also calculated. Fifty heifers previously ranked as yearlings on phenotypic residual feed intake (RFI) were used. Animals [initial BW = 418 (SD = 31.5) kg] were offered a TMR diet consisting of 70:30 concentrate and corn silage on a DM basis (ME 10.7 MJ/kg of DM; DM 530 g/kg) for 84 d. Feeding duration (min/d) and feeding frequency (events/d) were calculated for each animal on a daily basis using a computerized feeding system. Ultrasonic kidney fat and lumbar and rump fat and muscle depths were recorded on 3 equally spaced occasions during the experimental period. Blood samples were collected by jugular venipuncture on 4 occasions during the experimental period and analyzed for plasma concentrations of IGF-I, insulin, and various metabolites. Phenotypic RFI was calculated for all animals as the residuals from a regression model regressing DMI on ADG and midtest BW0.75. Repeatability was calculated for several traits both within and between production phase using intraclass correlation and Pearson correlation coefficients as appropriate. Overall ADG, DMI, G:F, and RFI were 1.17 kg/d (SD = 0.19), 10.81 kg/d (SD = 1.02), 0.11 kg of BW gain/kg of DM (SD = 0.02), and 0.00 kg of DM/d (SD 0.59). Daily feeding events and eating rate tended to be positively correlated (P = 0.08) with RFI. Ultrasonic kidney fat depth tended to be related to G:F (r = −0.28; P = 0.07), and kidney fat accretion tended to be related to RFI (r = 0.29; P = 0.08). Plasma urea (r = 0.38; P < 0.01), β-hydroxybutyrate (r = 0.40; P < 0.01), and insulin (r = 0.23; P = 0.07) concentrations were correlated with RFI. Plasma glucose (r = −0.25; P = 0.07), glucose:insulin (r = 0.33; P < 0.05), and insulin (r = −0.30; P < 0.05) were associated with G:F. However, systemic IGF-I was unrelated (P > 0.10) to any measure of feed efficiency. Repeatability estimates within the finishing period for DMI, feeding duration, feeding events, feed intake/feeding event, and eating rate were 0.34, 0.37, 0.60, 0.62, and 0.56, respectively. Repeatability estimates (P < 0.001) between the growing and finishing phases for DMI, G:F, and RFI were r = 0.61, r = 0.37, and r = 0.62, respectively. Moderate to strong repeatability values (ranging from r = 0.40 to 0.76; P < 0.001) were obtained for feeding behavior traits between the yearling and finishing phases. We conclude that RFI and feeding behavior are repeatable traits and that some plasma analytes may be potential indicators of RFI in beef cattle. Copyright © 2010. American Society of Animal Science .

1 April 2011 in Journal of Dairy Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BOB.F. O’nEill
B.F. O’nEill
MDM.H. Deighton
M.H. Deighton
BOB.M. O’lOughlin
B.M. O’lOughlin
FMF.J. Mulligan
F.J. Mulligan
TBTommy Boland
Tommy Boland
ELE. Lewis
E. Lewis
The objective of the present study was to compare the enteric methane (CH4) emissions and milk production of spring-calving Holstein-Friesian cows offered either a grazed perennial ryegrass diet or a total mixed ration (TMR) diet for 10 wk in early lactation. Forty-eight spring-calving Holstein-Friesian dairy cows were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 nutritional treatments for 10 wk: 1) grass or 2) TMR. The grass group received an allocation of 17 kg of dry matter (DM) of grass per cow per day with a pre-grazing herbage mass of 1,492 kg of DM/ha. The TMR offered per cow per day was composed of maize silage (7.5 kg of DM), concentrate blend (8.6 kg of DM), grass silage (3.5 kg of DM), molasses (0.7 kg of DM), and straw (0.5 kg of DM). Daily CH4 emissions were determined via the emissions from ruminants using a calibrated tracer technique for 5 consecutive days during wk 4 and 10 of the study. Simultaneously, herbage dry matter intake (DMI) for the grass group was estimated using the n-alkane technique, whereas DMI for the TMR group was recorded using the Griffith Elder feeding system. Cows offered TMR had higher milk yield (29.5 vs. 21.1 kg/d), solids-corrected milk yield (27.7 vs. 20.1 kg/d), fat and protein (FP) yield (2.09 vs. 1.54 kg/d), bodyweight change (0.54 kg of gain/d vs. 0.37 kg of loss/d), and body condition score change (0.36 unit gain vs. 0.33 unit loss) than did the grass group over the course of the 10-wk study. Methane emissions were higher for the TMR group than the grass group (397 vs. 251 g/cow per day). The TMR group also emitted more CH4 per kg of FP (200 vs. 174 g/kg of FP) than did the grass group. They also emitted more CH4 per kg of DMI (20.28 vs. 18.06 g/kg of DMI) than did the grass group. In this study, spring-calving cows, consuming a high quality perennial ryegrass diet in the spring, produced less enteric CH4 emissions per cow, per unit of intake, and per unit of FP than did cows offered a standard TMR diet.

1 November 2014 in Animal Feed Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MDMatthew H. Deighton
Matthew H. Deighton
SWS. Richard O. Williams
S. Richard O. Williams
MHMurray C. Hannah
Murray C. Hannah
RERichard J. Eckard
Richard J. Eckard
TBTommy Boland
Tommy Boland
PMPeter J. Moate
Peter J. Moate
The sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer technique enables determination of enteric methane emissions from large numbers of individual ruminant animals. The objective of this research was to identify and correct substantial errors within the SF6 technique. Six experiments were undertaken using respiration chamber, laboratory or SF6 techniques. Experiment 1 used respiration chambers to demonstrate that the daily pattern of methane emissions from dairy cows was related to their pattern of feed intake. In contrast, the daily emission of SF6 from these cows was constant and independent of the pattern of methane emission. This finding supports the contention that in order to accurately determine daily methane emissions using the SF6 technique, it is necessary that gases are collected continuously at a constant rate for 24h. Since development of the SF6 technique in 1993, it has been propounded that capillary-tube flow restrictors achieved a constant rate of sample collection into evacuated gas collection canisters. Laboratory experiments 2, 3, 4 and 5 demonstrated that, when capillary-tube flow restrictors are used, the rate of sample collection declined and caused a bias of up to 15.6% in calculated methane emissions. This error was caused by an interaction between the declining sample collection rate and the pattern of an animal's methane emission over 24h. In contrast, orifice plate flow restrictors maintained a constant sample collection rate at canister pressures <0.31atm and thereby minimised the decline in sample collection rate. Experiment 5 also demonstrated that sample collection using orifice plate flow restrictors, combined with initial (<0.03atm) and final (<0.49atm) canister pressures, substantially reduced measurement error. Accuracy of the modified SF6 technique, incorporating orifice plate flow restrictors for 24h sample collection, was validated in Experiment 6. The mean (S.D.) methane yield (g CH4/kg DMI) of eight cows did not differ (P=0.135) when determined using the modified SF6 technique 22.3 (1.44) or chambers 21.9 (1.65). In addition, the between-animal coefficient of variation for methane yield determined using the modified SF6 technique (6.5%) was similar to that determined using chambers (7.5%). Consequently the modified SF6 technique enables the statistical power of experiments to be increased or their size decreased. We conclude that the modified SF6 technique reduced error associated with SF6 release, sample collection and analysis. It is recommended that the modified SF6 technique should be used in preference to the original SF6 technique for determination of enteric methane emissions from ruminants

1 October 2010 in Journal of Dairy Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CWC.M. Wims
C.M. Wims
MDM.H. Deighton
M.H. Deighton
ELE. Lewis
E. Lewis
BOB. O’lOughlin
B. O’lOughlin
LDL. Delaby
L. Delaby
MOM. O’dOnovan
M. O’dOnovan
Increasing milk production from pasture while increasing grass dry matter intake (GDMI) and lowering methane (CH(4)) emissions are key objectives of low-cost dairy production systems. It was hypothesized that offering swards of low herbage mass with increased digestibility leads to increased milk output. A grazing experiment was undertaken to investigate the effects of varying levels of HM on CH(4) emissions, GDMI and milk production of grazing dairy cows during the mid-season grazing period (June to July). Prior to the experiment, 46 Holstein-Friesian dairy cows (46 d in milk) were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatments (n=23) in a randomized block design. The 2 treatments consisted of 2 target pregrazing HM: 1,000 kg of dry matter (DM)/ha (low herbage mass, LHM) or 2,200 kg of DM/ha (high herbage mass, HHM). The experimental period lasted 2 mo from June 1 until July 31. Within the experimental period, there were 2 measurement periods, measurement 1 (M1) and measurement 2 (M2), where CH(4) emissions, GDMI, and milk production were measured. Mean herbage mass throughout the measurement periods was 1,075 kg of DM/ha and 1,993 kg of DM/ha for the LHM and HHM treatments, respectively. Grass quality in terms of organic matter digestibility was significantly higher for the LHM treatment in M2 (+12 g/kg of DM). In M1, the effect of herbage mass on grass quality was approaching significance in favor of the LHM treatment. Herbage mass did not significantly affect milk production during the measurement periods. Cows grazing the LHM swards had increased GDMI in M1 (+1.5 kg of DM) compared with cows grazing the HHM swards; no difference in GDMI was observed in M2. Grazing HHM swards increased CH(4) production per cow per day (+42 g), per kilogram of milk yield (+3.5 g/kg of milk), per kilogram of milk solids (+47 g/kg of milk solids), and per kilogram of GDMI (+3.1 g/kg of GDMI) in M2. Cows grazing the HHM swards lost a greater proportion of their gross energy intake as CH(4) during both measurement periods (+0.9% and +1% for M1 and M2, respectively). It was concluded that grazing LHM swards would increase grass quality with a concurrent reduction in CH(4) emissions.

18 February 2011 in Grass and Forage Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PCP. Creighton
P. Creighton
EKEmer Kennedy
Emer Kennedy
LSL. Shalloo
L. Shalloo
TBTommy Boland
Tommy Boland
MDM. O’ Donovan
M. O’ Donovan