Background: This study conducted a novel systematic bibliometric and visualization analysis of global literature on immunotherapy for endometrial cancer (EC) to explore dynamic trends, research hotspots, and emerging topics, providing valuable references for future research.Methods: Articles and reviews on EC immunotherapy published between 2012 and August 2024 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). Bibliometric tools, CiteSpace and VOSviewer, were used to analyze clustering patterns and research dynamics.Results: A total of 861 articles were contributed by 5,331 authors from 1,392 institutions across 58 countries or regions, involving 1,823 keywords. China demonstrated outstanding performance in this field, contributing over 40% of the total publications and ranking first in publication volume. However, the total citation counts for publications from China lags that of the United States, highlighting the latter’s leading position and areas for further improvement in China’s research efforts. The University of Texas Medical Anderson Cancer Center and Nanjing Medical University were the two institutions with the highest number of publications. In terms of authorship, research teams led by Bosse, Tjalling, and Creutzberg, Carien L made significant contributions to advancing the field. Among individual publications, the work by Talhouk et al. achieved the highest average annual citation count of 70.88, demonstrating its profound impact. In terms of journals, Gynecologic Oncology emerged as a pivotal academic platform, publishing numerous articles and achieving the highest co-citation frequency. Additionally, Frontiers in Oncology, Frontiers in Immunology, and Frontiers in Genetics have become some of the most active and rapidly developing journals in recent years. Research hotspots are concentrated on themes such as the “Tumor Immune Microenvironment”, “Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors”, and “Targeted Therapy”. Recent trends and frontier research focus on the combined application of immune checkpoint inhibitors with other therapies, research on the application of nanotechnology in immunotherapy, and the integration of artificial intelligence to enhance precision medicine. Additionally, efforts are increasingly directed toward advancing various immunotherapy strategies from basic research to clinical applications.Conclusions: This comprehensive analysis reveals rapid advancements and significant potential in EC immunotherapy. Strengthening international collaboration and addressing barriers in the translation of research to clinical practice will drive further progress in this promising field.

Background: To deeply explore the dynamic trends, focal points and emerging topics of bacterial biofilm eradication field and provide novel insights for prospective research endeavors, the first global bibliometric and visualized analysis of the field was employed in this study.Methods: The study meticulously curated articles and reviews concentrating on biofilm eradication from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) and identified literature published in 2012–2022 for further analysis, and the bibliometric and visualized analysis was performed to elucidate a clustering pattern in the domain with tools mainly including CiteSpace and VOSviewer.Results: 15,503 authors affiliated with 2,397 institutions spanning 96 countries or regions contributed to a corpus of 3,201 articles, containing 7,005 keywords. The USA emerged as a commanding vanguard in exploring the antibiofilm strategies and displaying pioneering initiatives within this sphere. The Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) emerged as the most prolific source of publications. Noteworthy among authors, Pandian Shunmugiah Karutha secured the lead in article contributions as well as co-citations while Deng Le with his team is poised to become a dominant influence in the future. Despite that, the extent of collaborative engagement across different institutions and authors appeared to fall short of its potential. Frontiers in Microbiology led the discourse by publishing a substantial body of articles and standing as the most recurrently co-cited publication. The most influential research domains encompassed “bacterial biofilm formation, “photodynamic therapy” and “phage therapy.” Recent trends and forefronts concentrate on intensifying research into facilitating the shift of multiple strategies for biofilm eradication from controlled lab settings or animal studies to real-world clinical environments.Conclusion: Fundamentally, this study presents a comprehensive scrutiny and reveals that the realm of bacterial biofilm eradication is undergoing rapid evolution, with even greater expansion anticipated in the times ahead. Subsequent scholars should emphasize the augmentation of collaborative efforts and focus their energies on emerging topics, thus contributing to break through current barriers in transitioning biofilm eradication strategies from the “fundamental” stage to “practical” application.