This study evaluates four commonly used forms of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data for land-cover classification in tropical rural areas. The backscatter coefficient of linearly polarized L-band SAR was compared to two distinctive feature sets derived from Eigen-based and model-based decompositions. The performance of six classifiers available in Orfeo Toolbox (OTB), that is, Bayes, artificial neural networks (ANNs), Support Vector Machine (SVM), decision trees, Random Forests (RFs), and gradient boosting trees (GBTs), was investigated to distinguish five and seven land-cover classes, with particular attention given to several types of woody vegetation: forest, mixed garden, rubber, oil palm, and tea plantations. Classifiers reacted differently to ingested forms of SAR data, and careless use of data input yielded a negative impact. The results showed that SVM provided the highest overall accuracy although the performance was not significantly better than the others. Tuning the parameters, however, significantly improved the accuracy of ANN and SVM, while RF and GBT did not respond well. Responses of two SVM parameters (cost and kernel type) fluctuated somewhat, which required further attention. ANN accuracy was improved when the number of neurons in the hidden layer was set between 10 and 12. We found that accuracy imbalance existed between designated land-cover classes, especially in woody vegetation. Imbalance can partially be reduced by tuning specific classifiers. We showed that classifier tuning can lead to significantly improved accuracy, especially for classes having medium or low accuracies. This research also demonstrated that freely available toolkits such as OTB and QGIS can be beneficial for mapping activities in developing countries, achieving a reasonable accuracy if the classification parameters are tuned properly.
24 January 2017 in European Journal of Remote Sensing
This paper presents an evaluation on strategies for rubber plantation mapping employing SAR data coupled with Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). Linear backscatter coefficients achieved saturation point at about 10 years, making this form of polarimetric data being robust only for young to mature stands. This research found that the performance of both algorithms was comparable. The addition of texture features gave substantial impact to the overall accuracy. As indicated by the analysis of variable importance, only some texture features have contributed to higher overall accuracy. Classification using a subset of texture features pointed out that accuracy could be improved using dual polarimetric data, while trivial enhancement was seen in combined HH, HV and VV backscatter intensities. The research showed that classification accuracy could be further augmented by setting proper classification parameters. Nonetheless, it is argued that the level of improvement would greatly depend on selecting a proper dataset fed into classifier, rather than tuning classifier parameters.
This research aims to detect subtle changes by combining binary change analysis, the Iteratively Reweighted Multivariate Alteration Detection (IRMAD), over dual polarimetric Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS) backscatter with augmented data for post-classification change analysis. The accuracy of change detection was iteratively evaluated based on thresholds composed of mean and a range constant of standard deviation. Four datasets were examined for post-classification change analysis including the dual polarimetric backscatter as the benchmark and its augmented data with indices, entropy alpha decomposition and selected texture features. Variable importance was then evaluated to build a best subset model employing seven classifiers, including Bagged Classification and Regression Tree (CAB), Extreme Learning Machine Neural Network (ENN), Bagged Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline (MAB), Regularised Random Forest (RFG), Original Random Forest (RFO), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Extreme Gradient Boosting Tree (XGB). The best accuracy was 98.8%, which resulted from thresholding MAD variate-2 with constants at 1.7. The highest improvement of classification accuracy was obtained by amending the grey level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) texture. The identification of variable importance (VI) confirmed that selected GLCM textures (mean and variance of HH or HV) were equally superior, while the contribution of index and decomposition were negligible. The best model produced similar classification accuracy at about 90% for both years 2007 and 2010. Tree-based algorithms including RFO, RFG and XGB were more robust than SVM and ENN. Subtle changes indicated by binary change analysis were somewhat hidden in post-classification analysis. Reclassification by combining all important variables and adding five classes to include subtle changes assisted by Google Earth yielded an accuracy of 82%.
The new COVID-19 coronavirus disease has emerged as a global threat and not just to human health but also the global economy. Due to the pandemic, most countries affected have therefore imposed periods of full or partial lockdowns to restrict community transmission. This has had the welcome but unexpected side effect that existing levels of atmospheric pollutants, particularly in cities, have temporarily declined. As found by several authors, air quality can inherently exacerbate the risks linked to respiratory diseases, including COVID-19. In this study, we explore patterns of air pollution for ten of the most affected countries in the world, in the context of the 2020 development of the COVID-19 pandemic. We find that the concentrations of some of the principal atmospheric pollutants were temporarily reduced during the extensive lockdowns in the spring. Secondly, we show that the seasonality of the atmospheric pollutants is not significantly affected by these temporary changes, indicating that observed variations in COVID-19 conditions are likely to be linked to air quality. On this background, we confirm that air pollution may be a good predictor for the local and national severity of COVID-19 infections.