Skin flaps are necessary in plastic and reconstructive surgery for the removal of skin cancer, wounds, and ulcers. A skin flap is a portion of skin with its own blood supply that is partially separated from its original position and moved from one place to another. The use of skin flaps is often accompanied by cell necrosis or apoptosis due to ischemia–reperfusion (I/R) injury. Proinflammatory cytokines, such as nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), inhibitor of kappa B (IκB), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and oxygen free radicals are known causative agents of cell necrosis and apoptosis. To prevent I/R injury, many investigators have suggested the inhibition of proinflammatory cytokines, stem-cell therapies, and drug-based therapies. Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) is a strategy used to prevent I/R injury. IPC is an experimental technique that uses short-term repetition of occlusion and reperfusion to adapt the area to the loss of blood supply. IPC can prevent I/R injury by inhibiting proinflammatory cytokine activity. Various stem cell applications have been studied to facilitate flap survival and promote angiogenesis and vascularization in animal models. The possibility of constructing tissue engineered flaps has also been investigated. Although numerous animal studies have been published, clinical data with regard to IPC in flap reconstruction have never been reported. In this study, we present various experimental skin flap methods, IPC methods, and methods utilizing molecular factors associated with IPC.

Lee HY, et al. J Breast Cancer. 2021 Apr;24(2):196-205. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2021.24.e18

Background In breast reconstruction, synthetic meshes are frequently used to replace acellular dermal matrix (ADM), since ADM is expensive and often leads to complications. However, there is limited evidence that compares the types of substitutes. This study aimed to compare complications between materials via a network meta-analysis. Methods We systematically reviewed studies reporting any type of complication from 2010 to 2021. The primary outcomes were the proportion of infection, seroma, major complications, or contracture. We classified the intervention into four categories: ADM, absorbable mesh, nonabsorbable mesh, and nothing used. We then performed a network meta-analysis between these categories and estimated the odds ratio with random-effect models. Results Of 603 searched studies through the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases, following their review by two independent reviewers, 61 studies were included for full-text reading, of which 17 studies were finally included. There was a low risk of bias in the included studies, but only an indirect comparison between absorbable and non-absorbable mesh was possible. Infection was more frequent in ADM but not in the two synthetic mesh groups, namely the absorbable or nonabsorbable types, compared with the nonmesh group. The proportion of seroma in the synthetic mesh group was lower (odds ratio was 0.2 for the absorbable and 0.1 for the nonabsorbable mesh group) than in the ADM group. Proportions of major complications and contractures did not significantly differ between groups. Conclusion Compared with ADM, synthetic meshes have low infection and seroma rates. However, more studies concerning aesthetic outcomes and direct comparisons are needed.

Background: Paranasal augmentation has commonly been performed utilizing alloplastic materials such as silicone or porous polyethylene. However, there are problems such as bone absorption, implant migration, and infection risk attributable to intraoral approaches. Objectives: The authors attempted anterior positioning of the alar crease junction as an adjunct method of rhinoplasty. The authors aimed to determine the long-term results of the intranasal approach for placement of multi-folded expanded polytetrafluorethylene (ePTFE). Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent intranasal surgical approach for paranasal augmentation employing multi-folded ePTFE implants in 19 septorhinoplasties who were followed-up for 3 to 10 years. Patient charts were reviewed for demographic information, concomitant operations, and complications. Preoperative and postoperative photographs were utilized to evaluate operative outcomes. The photographs were reformatted to 2-dimensional images employing standard photographic methods. Results: Of the 19 patients treated, 17 were female and 2 were male; ages ranged from 18 to 58 years. All patients reported improvement in their lateral profiles and were pleased at follow-up. There were no major complications, no nerve or vascular supply compromise, and no cases of implant malposition. The average increase in soft tissue outline near the alar crease junction was more than 3.2 mm (P < 0.001), but the alar base did not became wider. Conclusions: Paranasal augmentation with multi-folded ePTFE is a simple, safe, and effective method that can readily improve the lateral profile. In particular, the intranasal approach combined with rhinoplasty can synergistically improve outcomes and lead to greater patient satisfaction. Level of Evidence: 4:

Background: Autologous material remains the preferred graft material for use in rhinoplasty. However, resorption rates of autografts remain controversial. In addition, long-term follow-up studies on autografts are rare. Thus, the objective of the present study was to access long-term resorption rates of various autologous grafts on the upper nasal third. Methods: Medical records of patients who had undergone septorhinoplasty with dorsal augmentation using autologous tissues between 2009 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Autogenous grafts applied on the nasal dorsum were categorized into three groups: rolled superficial mastoid fascia, diced cartilage wrapped with superficial mastoid fascia, and rolled sacral dermis. Preoperative and postoperative photographs were used to evaluate resorption rates and projection. Results: The rolled sacral dermis group showed a steep increase in postoperative projection but a sharp decrease in long-term follow-up projection compared to the other two groups. Among these three groups, there were statistically significant trend differences in rhinion (p < 0.001) and ½ nasion-rhinion point (p < 0.001), but not in nasion. Of these three groups, the rolled sacral dermis group showed the most projection, followed by the diced cartilage wrapped with superficial mastoid fascia group. The resorption rate was the highest in the rolled superficial mastoid fascia group (p < 0.001). Regarding resorption rates in the other two groups, the rolled sacral dermis group had a higher rate than the diced cartilage wrapped with superficial mastoid fascia group. Conclusions: At least 50 percent of resorption was observed in almost all groups in the long term. The choice of graft material and proper decision-making could determine success or failure. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Background: In diabetic foot infection, causative pathogens differ in Western population as compared with Asian population. The aim of this study is to analyze microbiological data with respect to diabetic foot infection in Korea to help the choice adequate empirical antibiotics. Methods: We enrolled 745 patients with diabetic foot infection, who were admitted to diabetic wound center of the Korea University Guro Hospital between January 2011 and December 2015. Deep tissue and/or bone biopsy cultures were taken during surgical debridement in the operating room and microbiological analysis was performed. Results: Out of the 745 patients, 613 patients (82.2%) had isolated causative organisms and 832 microbial isolates were identified. Gram-positive aerobic bacteria were isolated in 57.5%, followed by Gram-negative aerobic bacteria (40.0%), anaerobes (1.4%), and fungus (1.1%). MRSA found most frequently identified (13.7%) in Gram-positive aerobes and Pseudomonas found most frequently identified (9.4%) in Gram-negative aerobes. Conclusion: Microbiologic analysis in Korea differs from the reports from Western population. We propose the need of our own guidelines based on microbiology of Korea for better treatment.