Lung cancer, including both non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer, remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, representing 18% of the total cancer deaths in 2020. Many patients are identified already at an advanced stage with metastatic disease and have a worsening prognosis. Recent advances in the genetic understanding of lung cancer have opened new avenues for personalized treatments and targeted therapies. This review examines the latest discoveries in the genetics of lung cancer, discusses key biomarkers, and analyzes current clinical therapies based on this genetic information. It will conclude with a discussion of future prospects and potential research directions.

Several different nosological classifications have been used over time for vascular malformations (VMs) since clinical and pathological signs are largely overlapping. In a large proportion of cases, VMs are generated by somatic mosaicism in key genes, belonging to a few different molecular pathways. Therefore, molecular characterization may help in the understanding of the biological mechanisms related to the development of pathology. Tissue biopsy is not routinely included in the diagnostic path because of the need for fresh tissue specimens and the risk of bleeding. Bypassing the need for bioptic samples, we took advantage of the possibility of isolating cell-free DNA likely released by the affected tissues, to molecularly characterize 53 patients by cfDNA-NGS liquid biopsy. We found a good match between the identified variant and the clinical presentation. PIK3CA variants were found in 67% of Klippel Trenaunay Syndrome individuals; KRAS variants in 60% of arteriovenous malformations; MET was mutated in 75% of lymphovenous malformations. Our results demonstrate the power of cfDNA-NGS liquid biopsy in VMs clinical classification, diagnosis, and treatment. Indeed, tailored repurposing of pre-existing cancer drugs, such as PIK3CA, KRAS, and MET inhibitors, can be envisaged as adjuvant treatment, in addition to surgery and/or endovascular treatment, in the above-defined VMs categories, respectively.

Background: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) remains a challenging disease to manage with effectiveness. Early detection and precise monitoring are crucial for improving patient outcomes. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) offers a non-invasive cancer detection and monitoring method. Emerging biomarkers, such as ctDNA methylation, have shown promise in enhancing diagnostic accuracy and prognostic assessment in NSCLC. In this review, we examined the current evidence regarding ctDNA methylation’s role in NSCLC detection through a systematic review of the existing literature and meta-analysis. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases up to 26 June 2024 for studies on the role of ctDNA methylation analysis in NSCLC patients. We included studies from 2010 to 2024 on NSCLC patients. We excluded case reports, non-English articles, studies on cell lines or artificial samples, those without cfDNA detection, prognostic studies, and studies with non-extractable data or mixed cancer types. Funnel plots were visually examined for potential publication bias, with a p value < 0.05 indicating bias. Meta-analysis was conducted using R packages (meta, forestplot, and mada). Combined sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR−), positive and negative predictive values, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. A summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) and area under the curve (AUC) with related Standard Error (SE) were used to evaluate the overall diagnostic performance. Additionally, RASSF1A, APC, SOX17, SEPT9, and RARβ2 were analyzed, since their methylation was assessed in two or more studies. Results: From 38 candidate papers, we finally identified 12 studies, including 472 NSCLC patients. The pooled sensitivity was 0.62 (0.47–0.77) and the specificity was 0.90 (0.85–0.94). The diagnostic odds ratio was 15.6 (95% CI 9.36–26.09) and the area under the curve was 0.249 (SE = 0.138). The positive and negative predictive values were 5.38 (95% CI 3.89–7.44) and 0.34 (95% CI 0.22–0.54), respectively. For single genes, the specificity reached 0.83~0.96, except for RARβ2, but the sensitivity was relatively low for each gene. Significant heterogeneity across the included studies, the potential publication bias for specificity (p = 0.0231), and the need to validate the clinical utility of ctDNA methylation for monitoring treatment response and predicting outcomes in NSCLC patients represent the main limitations of this study. Conclusions: These results provide evidence of the significant potential of ctDNA methylation as a valuable biomarker for improving the diagnosis of NSCLC, advocating for its integration into clinical practice to enhance patient management.

Lung cancer, including both non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer, remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide representing 18% of the total cancer deaths in 2020. Many patients are identified already at an advanced stage with metastatic disease and have a worsening prognosis. Recent advances in the genetic understanding of lung cancer have opened new avenues for personalized treatments and targeted therapies. This review examines the latest discoveries in the genetics of lung cancer, discusses key biomarkers, and analyzes current clinical therapies based on this genetic information. It will conclude with a discussion of future prospects and potential research directions.

Lung cancer (LC) continues to be an important public health problem, being the most common form of cancer and a major cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Despite the great bulk of research to identify genetic susceptibility genes by genome-wide association studies, only few loci associated to nicotine dependence have been consistently replicated. Our previously published study in few phenotypically discordant sib-pairs identified a combination of germline truncating mutations in known cancer susceptibility genes in never-smoker early-onset LC patients, which does not present in their healthy sib. These results firstly demonstrated the presence of an oligogenic combination of disrupted cancer-predisposing genes in non-smokers patients, giving experimental support to a model of a “private genetic epidemiology”. Here, we used a combination of whole-exome and RNA sequencing coupled with a discordant sib’s model in a novel cohort of pairs of never-smokers early-onset LC patients and in their healthy sibs used as controls. We selected rare germline variants predicted as deleterious by CADD and SVM bioinformatics tools and absent in the healthy sib. Overall, we identified an average of 200 variants per patient, about 10 of which in cancer-predisposing genes. In most of them, RNA sequencing data reinforced the pathogenic role of the identified variants showing: (i) downregulation in LC tissue (indicating a “second hit” in tumor suppressor genes); (ii) upregulation in cancer tissue (likely oncogene); and (iii) downregulation in both normal and cancer tissue (indicating transcript instability). The combination of the two techniques demonstrates that each patient has an average of six (with a range from four to eight) private mutations with a functional effect in tumor-predisposing genes. The presence of a unique combination of disrupting events in the affected subjects may explain the absence of the familial clustering of non-small-cell lung cancer. In conclusion, these findings indicate that each patient has his/her own “predisposing signature” to cancer development and suggest the use of personalized therapeutic strategies in lung cancer.

Background: While Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly improved outcomes in lung cancer (LC), clinical responses remain heterogeneous. Static tissue biomarkers, like PD-L1, and tumor mutational burden (TMB) are limited by intratumoral heterogeneity and the inability to track temporal changes. This review aims to evaluate the current state and future potential of liquid biopsy as a dynamic tool for patient selection, treatment monitoring, and the identification of resistance mechanisms in LC immunotherapy. Methods: A literature search was conducted in the PubMed database up to March 2026. We identified 65 eligible publications, including clinical trials, observational studies, and systematic reviews, focusing on liquid biopsy analytes such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), exosomes, and soluble immune mediators. Results: Liquid biopsy provides a “pooled” representation of the total tumor burden, overcoming the spatial limitations of tissue biopsy. Key findings include that dynamic changes in ctDNA and bTMB can predict molecular progression weeks before radiological assessment; blood-based PD-L1 monitoring (soluble, exosomal, or on CTCs) correlates with survival outcomes and offers a real-time readout of immune checkpoint activity; novel markers like tumor-macrophage fusion (TMF) cells and cytokine signatures provide unique insights into the systemic immune microenvironment. Conclusions: Liquid biopsy is evolving from a complementary diagnostic tool into a central pillar of precision immuno-oncology. Although technical standardization remains a challenge, the integration of multi-omic blood-based biomarkers represents the future of personalized lung cancer management.