Vassilis Sakkas

Dr. Vassilis Sakkas

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Attikí, Greece
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2013 in Tectonophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ELE. Lagios
E. Lagios
VSVassilis Sakkas
Vassilis Sakkas
FNF. Novali
F. Novali
FBF. Bellotti
F. Bellotti
AFAlessandro Ferretti
Alessandro Ferretti
VDV. Dietrich
V. Dietrich

18 October 2005 in Bulletin of Volcanology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ELE. Lagios
E. Lagios
VSVassilis Sakkas
Vassilis Sakkas
IPIs. Parcharidis
Is. Parcharidis
VDV. Dietrich
V. Dietrich

1 July 2021 in The Seismic Record
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
George KavirisGeorge Kaviris
George Kaviris
Panagiotis EliasPanagiotis Elias
Panagiotis Elias
Vasilis KapetanidisVasilis Kapetanidis
Vasilis Kapetanidis
ASAnna Serpetsidaki
Anna Serpetsidaki
Andreas KarakonstantisAndreas Karakonstantis
Andreas Karakonstantis
PBPascal Bernard
Pascal Bernard
We investigate a seismic crisis that occurred in the western Gulf of Corinth (Greece) between December 2020 and February 2021. This area is the main focus of the Corinth Rift Laboratory (CRL) network, and has been closely monitored with local seismological and geodetic networks for 20 yr. The 2020–2021 seismic crisis evolved in three stages: It started with an Mw 4.6 event near the northern shore of the Gulf, opposite of Aigion, then migrated eastward toward Trizonia Island after an Mw 5.0 event, and eventually culminated with an Mw 5.3 event, ∼3  km northeast of the Psathopyrgos fault. Aftershocks gradually migrated westward, triggering another cluster near the junction with the Rion–Patras fault. Moment tensor inversion revealed mainly normal faulting; however, some strike‐slip mechanisms also exist, composing a complex tectonic regime in this region dominated by east–west normal faults. We employ seismic and geodetic observations to constrain the geometry and kinematics of the structures that hosted the major events. We discuss possible triggering mechanisms of the second and third stages of the sequence, including fluids migration and aseismic creep, and propose potential implications of the Mw 5.3 mainshock for the seismic hazard of the region.

1 November 2007 in Tectonophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ELE. Lagios
E. Lagios
VSVassilis Sakkas
Vassilis Sakkas
PPP. Papadimitriou
P. Papadimitriou
IPI. Parcharidis
I. Parcharidis
BDB.N. Damiata
B.N. Damiata
SVS. Vassilopoulou
S. Vassilopoulou

17 February 2020 in Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PPPanayotis Papadimitriou
Panayotis Papadimitriou
Vasilis KapetanidisVasilis Kapetanidis
Vasilis Kapetanidis
Andreas KarakonstantisAndreas Karakonstantis
Andreas Karakonstantis
Ioannis SpingosIoannis Spingos
Ioannis Spingos
Ioannis KassarasIoannis Kassaras
Ioannis Kassaras
NVNicholas Voulgaris
Nicholas Voulgaris
On 30 October 2020 11:51 UTC, a Mw=6.9 earthquake struck the offshore region north of Samos Island, Greece, in the Gulf of Ephesos/Kuşadasi, causing two fatalities and 19 minor injuries at Samos Island, as well as 115 casualties and over 1,030 injuries in Western Turkey. Preliminary results indicate that the mainshock occurred on a north-dipping normal fault, with a focal mechanism of 270º/50º/-81º. The selection of the fault plane is supported by evidence of uplift at western Samos and over 10 cm of subsidence at the northernmost edge of the central part of the island. The distribution of relocated hypocenters shows clustering of events, east of the mainshock’s epicenter, where most major aftershocks have occurred. To the west, a smaller group of aftershocks is observed, separated by a spatial gap in seismicity. The latter is likely related to the region of the fault plane where most of the co-seismic slip occurred, with Coulomb stress-transfer towards the western and eastern margins of the rupture triggering aftershock activity. The apparent complexity of the mainshock’s source time function, supported by preliminary results, could indicate the rupture of more than one structures. This could explain the relatively weak magnitude of the largest aftershock (Mw=5.0). The mainshock caused damage mainly to non-engineered constructions, i.e. old residential buildings, churches and monuments in Samos Island, and minor damage to the majority of the building stock of the island built according to the National Seismic Code. On the other hand, it caused severe damage at Izmir, especially to high-rise buildings. The mainshock also triggered a small tsunami that reached heights of over 1 m, mainly affecting the Turkish coast.

1 December 2007 in ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ELE. Lagios
E. Lagios
SVS. Vassilopoulou
S. Vassilopoulou
VSVassilis Sakkas
Vassilis Sakkas
VDV. Dietrich
V. Dietrich
BDB.N. Damiata
B.N. Damiata
Athanassios GanasAthanassios Ganas
Athanassios Ganas