Wachira Wongtanasarasin

Dr. Wachira Wongtanasarasin

Faculty of Medicine Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 October 2020 in Emergency Medicine Australasia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Wachira WongtanasarasinWachira Wongtanasarasin
Wachira Wongtanasarasin
TSThanchanok Srisawang
Thanchanok Srisawang
WYWanwisa Yothiya
Wanwisa Yothiya
PPPhichayut Phinyo
Phichayut Phinyo
Objective: To evaluate the impact of the national lockdown because of the 2019 coronavirus (COVID‐19) pandemic towards the ED visits and admission rates in Thailand.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical database of patients presenting to the ED during the national lockdown period (from 26 March to 30 June 2020). We used the same time interval in the year 2019 as the control period in our analysis. We collected baseline characteristics and outcomes of each patient in the ED. The primary outcome was the incidence rate ratio (IRR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of the average daily ED visits. Secondary outcomes included the IRR with 95% CI of total admissions and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions.Results: The average number of daily ED visits decreased significantly from 89.1 to 57.0 (−36.0%, IRR 0.69, 95% CI 0.67–0.70). However, the proportions of ‘Resuscitation’ and ‘Emergency’ triage level were increased (29.1% vs 19.2%, P < 0.001). Total ED admission rate and ICU admission rate were also increased (33.5% vs 28.3%, P < 0.001 and 10.2% vs 7.5%, P < 0.001, respectively). The IRR for the admission rate was 1.18 (95% CI 1.11–1.26), and the IRR for the ICU admission rate was 1.35 (95% CI 1.21–1.52).Conclusion: The national lockdown in Thailand was associated with a significant reduction in average daily ED visits across traumatic and non‐traumatic patients. Communication from healthcare professionals and public health officers is necessary to reinforce the importance of timely ED visits for acute health conditions.

28 January 2023 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JKJurairat Khongrum
Jurairat Khongrum
PYPRATOOMPORN YINGTHONGCHAI
PRATOOMPORN YINGTHONGCHAI
KBKongsak Boonyapranai
Kongsak Boonyapranai
Wachira WongtanasarasinWachira Wongtanasarasin
Wachira Wongtanasarasin
PAPaitoon Aobchey
Paitoon Aobchey
PCPennapa Chonpathompikunlert
Pennapa Chonpathompikunlert
Probiotics have the potential as a multi-target approach to modulate hypercholesterolemia associated with premature atherosclerosis. Various strains of Lactobacillus paracasei have been reported to affect hypercholesterolemia positively. This study aimed to investigate the effects of L. paracasei TISTR 2593 on lipid profile, cholesterol metabolism, and atherosclerosis according to the registration of Thai Clinical Trial Registry as identification number TCTR 20220917002. A total of 50 participants with hypercholesterolemia were randomly and equally assigned to consume L. paracasei TISTR 2593 or a placebo in maltodextrin capsules daily. Biomarkers of lipid profiles, oxidative stress state, inflammatory state, and other biological indicators were examined on days 0, 45, and 90. The results showed that subjects taking the L. paracasei TISTR 2593 could significantly reduce the level of serum low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (p < 0.05), malondialdehyde (p < 0.001), and tumor necrosis factor-α (p < 0.01). Moreover, L. paracasei TISTR 2593 increased the level of serum apolipoprotein E (p < 0.01) and adiponectin (p < 0.001) significantly. No changes in serum total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, triglyceride, total bile acids, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 were observed during L. paracasei TISTR 2593 supplementation. Therefore, L. paracasei TISTR 2593 could be an adjuvant probiotic supplement to ameliorate hypercholesterolemia and prevent or delay the development of atherosclerosis.

8 January 2022 in Resuscitation Plus
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Wachiranun SirikulWachiranun Sirikul
Wachiranun Sirikul
CPChanodom Piankusol
Chanodom Piankusol
BWBorwon Wittayachamnankul
Borwon Wittayachamnankul
SRSattha Riyapan
Sattha Riyapan
JSJirapong Supasaovapak
Jirapong Supasaovapak
BMBryan McNally
Bryan McNally
This study aimed to explore significant pre-hospital factors affecting the survivability of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) patients in countries with developing EMS systems. A retrospective cohort study was conducted examining data from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2020 from Utstein Registry databases in Thailand, collected through Pan-Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study (PAROS). Data were collected from three centres, including regional, suburban-capital, and urban-capital hospitals. The primary endpoint of this study was 30-day survival or discharged alive after an OHCA event. The multivariable risk regression was done by modified Poisson regression with robust error variance to explore the association between 30-day survival and pre-hospital factors with potential confounders adjustments. Of 1,240 OHCA cases transferred by Emergency Medical Services (EMS), 42 patients (3.4%) were discharged alive after 30 days, including 22 (8.6%), 8 (3.0%), and 12 (1.7%) from regional, suburban-capital, and urban-capital centres, respectively. The initial arrest rhythm was 89.7% unshockable, with no significant variations across the three centres. Overall, bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) was 40.4%. However, bystander CPR with Automated External Defibrillator (AED) application was 0.8%. Bystander CPR significantly increased 30-day survival probability (aRR 1.88, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.51; p 0.049). Additionally, reducing the EMS response time by one minute significantly increased OHCA survivability (aRR 1.12, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.20; p 0.001). Response time and bystander CPR are the factors that improve the 30-day survival outcomes of OHCA patients. In contrast, scene time, transport time, and pre-hospital advanced airway management didn’t improve 30-day OHCA survival.

21 September 2022 in Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JKJurairat Khongrum
Jurairat Khongrum
PYPratoomporn Yingthongchai
Pratoomporn Yingthongchai
KBKongsak Boonyapranai
Kongsak Boonyapranai
Wachira WongtanasarasinWachira Wongtanasarasin
Wachira Wongtanasarasin
NDNowwapan Donrung
Nowwapan Donrung
PCPennapa Chonpathompikunlert
Pennapa Chonpathompikunlert
Oxidative stress and inflammation play key roles in the pathophysiology in the pathophysiology of dyslipidemia, which are positive risks that increase atherosclerosis leading to important healthcare problems. Therefore, we aimed to study the antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, and lipid‐lowering effects of jelly drink containing polyphenol‐rich roselle calyces extract and passion fruit juice with pulp concentrate (RP jelly drink) in comparison to a placebo jelly drink for 8 weeks. Forty‐three adults with dyslipidemia were randomly assigned into two groups: the RP jelly drink group and the placebo group. Glucose, total cholesterol (TC) triglyceride (TG), low‐density lipoprotein‐cholesterol (LDL‐C), high‐density lipoprotein‐cholesterol (HDL‐C), oxidative stress biomarkers, inflammatory parameters, and monocyte chemotactic protein‐1 (MCP‐1) were measured with fasting blood samples at baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks of intervention. Results showed a significant decrease in LDL‐C and TG, respectively, after 8 weeks of RP jelly drink consumption (LDL‐C: 107.63 ± 22.98 mg/dL; TG: 109.79 ± 38.83 mg/dL) compared to baseline measurements (LDL‐C: 128.43 ± 32.74 mg/dL; TG: 132.33 ± 75.11 mg/dL). These may be possible due to reduced inflammation and improvements in oxidative stress, as demonstrated by the reduction of tumor necrosis factor‐ (TNF‐) α and malondialdehyde (MDA), and the enhancement of glutathione (GSH) after consuming the RP jelly drink for 8 weeks. However, no significant differences of treatment on glucose, total cholesterol, MCP‐1, interleukin‐6, and interleukin‐10 were observed. In conclusion, daily consumption of RP jelly drink for 8 weeks resulted in significant improvement in lipid profiles in subjects with dyslipidemia. However, more research is needed to assess its nutritional and functional potential.

1 October 2021 in Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Wachira WongtanasarasinWachira Wongtanasarasin
Wachira Wongtanasarasin
TTThatchapon Thepchinda
Thatchapon Thepchinda
CKChayada Kasirawat
Chayada Kasirawat
SSSuchada Saetiao
Suchada Saetiao
JLJirayupat Leungvorawat
Jirayupat Leungvorawat
NKNichanan Kittivorakanchai
Nichanan Kittivorakanchai
Introduction: Despite the standard guidelines stating that giving epinephrine for patients with cardiac arrest is recommended, the clinical benefits of epinephrine for patients with traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are still limited. This study aims to evaluate the benefits of epinephrine administration in traumatic OHCA patients. Methods: We searched four electronic databases up to June 30, 2020, without any language restriction in research sources. Studies comparing epinephrine administration for traumatic OHCA patients were included. Two independent authors performed the selection of relevant studies, data extraction, and assessment of the risk of bias. The primary outcome was inhospital survival rate. Secondary outcomes included prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), short-term survival, and favorable neurological outcome. We calculated the odds ratios (ORs) of those outcomes using the Mantel–Haenszel model and assessed the heterogeneity using the I2 statistic. Results: Four studies were included. The risk of bias of the included studies was low, except for one study in which the risk of bias was fair. All included studies reported the inhospital survival rate. Epinephrine administration during traumatic OHCA might not demonstrate a benefit for inhospital survival (OR: 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.11–3.37). Epinephrine showed no significant improvement in prehospital ROSC (OR: 4.67, 95% CI: 0.66–32.81). In addition, epinephrine might not increase the chance of short-term survival (OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 0.53–3.79). Conclusion: The use of epinephrine for traumatic OHCA may not improve either inhospital survival or prehospital ROSC and short-term survival. Epinephrine administration as indicated in standard advanced life support algorithms might not be routinely used in traumatic OHCA.

8 February 2021 in Acta Physiologica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Wachira WongtanasarasinWachira Wongtanasarasin
Wachira Wongtanasarasin
NSNatthaphat Siri‐Angkul
Natthaphat Siri‐Angkul
BWBorwon Wittayachamnankul
Borwon Wittayachamnankul
SCSiriporn C Chattipakorn
Siriporn C Chattipakorn
NCNipon Chattipakorn
Nipon Chattipakorn