Background: Habitual use of high-heeled shoes (HHS) has been reported to negatively impact different body structures. However, few studies have investigated its effect on plantarflexor performance. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of habitual wear of HHS and knee joint position (to isolate the function of the gastrocnemius) on the isokinetic performance of the plantarflexors and ankle joint range of motion (ROM). Methods: A high-heel (HH) group included 12 women (25.4 ± 4.8 y) who have been wearing HHS for ≥40 hours/wk and for at least a year. A control group (CTRL) had 12 women (21.3 ± 0.5 y) who have occasionally been wearing HHS for <10 hours/wk. Participants performed isokinetic (60 degrees/s) plantarflexion movements through a range set between 15 degrees dorsiflexion and 30 degrees plantarflexion. Ankle joint ROM and average peak plantarflexion torque and power were recorded in 2 knee joint positions, extension and 90 degrees flexion. Results: Overall, torque was significantly affected by knee position ( P = .04) and habitual use of HHS ( P < .001), whereas power was impacted by knee position only ( P < .001). Within each group, flexing the knee reduced isokinetic measurements. However, the reduction was greater for the HH group (torque: 54 Nm, power: 35.6 W) compared with the CTRL group (torque: 42 Nm, power: 32.5 W). Ankle joint ROM was significantly different between groups in knee flexion only. Conclusion: Flexing the knee limited the plantarflexor muscular performance and the limitation was more significant in habitual users of HHS compared to nonusers. Thus, it is concluded that habitual use of HHS impacts the contractile properties of soleus more than gastrocnemius. Clinical Relevance: The soleus is important for walking and anterior cruciate ligament protection. Thus, HHS users could be susceptible to injury and may need longer and more intensive posttraumatic rehabilitation. Therefore, clinicians should consider knee position when examining the plantarflexors of habitual HHS users.

This study aims to examine the electromyographic activity of the regional spinal muscle between patients with forward head posture (FHP) and those with a normal cranio-vertebral (CV) angle. We recruited 60 adult women aged between 18 and 29 years from a single institution. The CV angle was measured in the sagittal plane, which helped us to assign the participants in the FHP group (n = 30) with a large CV angle (53.1 ± 2.3) and the control group (n = 30) with a normal CV angle (43.0 ± 3.6). The surface electromyography (EMG) was used to measure the magnitude of normalised muscle activity of eight spinal muscles (cervical, lumbar, and thoracic levels) while standing and performing a specific manual handling task. The CV angle was significantly lower in the FHP group than in the control group (p = .001). The cervical erector spinae (CES) muscle activity was significantly increased in the FHP group compared to that in the control group. The right and left CES of those in the FHP group exhibited 73% and 87%, respectively, higher normalised muscle activity than those in the control group while performing the manual handling task (p = .001). No significant difference was detected for the thoracic or lumbar segment muscles between groups. Our results indicate that greater neck muscle demands result from anterior head translation in FHP. This effect is a counterbalance to the reduced CV angle and to support the neck. The increased activity of the neck muscles in FHP could demand more support from the neck muscles and might increase the risk of spinal injuries. Management of FHP is essential to avoid overloading the spinal muscles.

Background: Forward head posture (FHP) is a common malalignment affecting the cervicothoracic spine. This deviation is associated with neck disability and muscle imbalance. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of FHP correction using regional versus comprehensive spinal programs on the craniovertebral (CV) angle, neck disability, and spinal muscle activity. Methods: Sixty participants with FHP were randomly assigned to receive either a cervicothoracic correction program (control group) or a cervicothoracic plus lumbopelvic program (experimental group). The CV angle, neck disability index (NDI), and normalized electromyography as a percentage of maximum voluntary isometric contraction (%MVIC) from spinal muscles were measured before and after the intervention. Results: Post-intervention, both groups showed significant improvement across time in CV angle and NDI (p < 0.001, p = 0.002). However, the between-group comparison was not statistically significant. The NDI showed significant improvement only in the experimental group ( p = 0.005). The minimal clinical important difference (MCID) obtained was 6.44 for the NDI. A reduction in %MVIC over time was observed in both groups for cervical erector spinae (Right, p = 0.006, Left, p = 0.001). The between-group comparison of spinal muscle activation was not significantly different. Conclusion: The study suggested that FHP management using a cervicothoracic or cervicothoracic plus lumbopelvic protocol could improve cervical posture and lower cervical muscle demand. Incorporating a lumbopelvic into the cervicothoracic protocol was more effective in reducing short-term neck pain and disability than a cervicothoracic protocol alone. A comprehensive spine program may be a clinically beneficial rehabilitation protocol for FHP to improve neck pain and disability.

[Purpose] To examine whether combining botulinum toxin type A with physiotherapy is better than botulinum toxin type A alone in reducing muscle tone and improving gross motor function in spastic diplegia. [Subjects and Methods] Forty-six ambulatory children with spastic diplegia (age: 25–154 months) were recruited. Patients were assigned to Groups 1 (n=18) and 2 (n=28). After baseline assessment, all children received botulinum toxin type A injections (6 units/kg) into the lower limb muscles. A second botulinum toxin type A injection was given 6 months later. The ankles were placed in plaster casts for 2 weeks after the first injection and an orthosis was prescribed after cast removal. Group 2 received 2 weeks of intensive physiotherapy. The gross motor function scores for the 2 groups were recorded at baseline, 4, 6, and 52 weeks. [Results] The improvement in gross motor function scores was significant for Group 2 and non-significant for Group 1. After 4, 6, and 52 weeks, Groups 1 and 2 showed 2.6% and 6.3% improvement, 4.8% and 12% improvement, and 5.5% and 19.4% improvement, respectively. [Conclusion] The addition of a 2-week physiotherapy programme after the initial botulinum toxin type A injections produced significantly greater improvements in gross motor function scores.

Purpose: The new Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has caused significant impact on the medical sector worldwide, including physical therapy (PT). The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the PT services, and the associated psychological distress endured by PT practitioners in Saudi Arabia.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to survey on-duty PT practitioners using a web-based questionnaire. Licensed PT practitioners working in Saudi Arabia (n = 265) participated and completed all the survey questions. The questionnaire comprised 30 questions covering the sociodemographic data and the outcome measures, which included the impact of the pandemic on the PT practice, use of telerehabilitation, administrative response during the pandemic, and PT practitioners’ anxiety measured by the General Anxiety Disorder-7 scale.Results: During the lockdown, disruptive impact on the PT practice was reported by most of the participants (80%). The majority of PT clinics/departments were either partially (43.8%) or completely (31.3%) shutdown, and therapists treated patients less than usual. Around 30% of participants reported using a telerehabilitation approach during the pandemic to communicate with patients, and about 33% received online courses and webinars to adapt the PT practice in response to the pandemic. About 21% of participants endured moderate to severe levels of anxiety, which was more pronounced among females.Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted the PT services in Saudi Arabia. Consequently, the number of patients treated was reduced, and therapists suffered notable psychological stress. Furthermore, although implemented, adaptive administrative measures were inadequate. Physical therapy practitioners and administrative authorities are encouraged to prioritize training and implementation of telerehabilitation as a likely prospective approach of PT practice.