Background: Posttraumatic shoulder dislocations with glenoid rim fractures show high rates of dislocation recurrence. For glenoid rim defects exceeding a certain size, several investigators recommend bone grafting. Few reports on anatomical glenoid reconstruction addressing this problem are published. Hypothesis: Anatomical glenoid reconstruction by the J-bone graft creates permanent joint stability without a clinically relevant loss of motion. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Forty-seven shoulders with glenoid rim fractures after recurrent anterior dislocation were stabilized by a J-bone graft. For clinical outcome, motion and strength compared with the uninjured shoulder, as well as sports activity, were recorded. The Rowe score and the Constant-Murley score were used for scoring. In cases of follow-up exceeding 6 years, computed tomography scans were obtained and compared to preoperative radiographs. Results: The mean Rowe score was 94.3 for the affected shoulder and 96.8 for the uninjured side. The Constant score reached 93.5 and 95 points, respectively. Loss of external rotation was 4.36° in adduction and 3.19° at 90° of abduction. The computed tomography evaluation included 24 shoulders at a mean follow-up of 106.2 months. There were no recurrences of instability and 1 traumatic graft fracture. Of the 19 patients in whom arthropathy was present at follow-up, 11 had arthrosis before surgery. Conclusion: The J-bone graft is capable of creating a stable shoulder joint without causing extensive loss of motion on the long term in patients with traumatic glenoid rim fractures after shoulder dislocation. In some patients, mild to moderate arthropathy develops despite anatomical glenoid reconstruction.

Background: Biplane radiologic evaluation is indispensable for the correct diagnosis of acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries. Thus far, no functional radiographic techniques have been quantified to evaluate horizontal instability in acute AC joint dislocations. Hypothesis: Supine dynamic axillary lateral shoulder views detect horizontal instability of the distal clavicle in patients with acute AC joint dislocations. Study Design: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Twenty-five consecutive patients with a mean age of 39 ± 14 years with acute AC joint injury underwent biplane radiologic evaluation, including a conventional Zanca view and an axillary lateral view in a sitting position. In addition, supine axillary lateral views with the arm in 90° of abduction and 60° of flexion and extension were taken to evaluate the horizontal dynamics of the distal clavicle. The gleno-acromio-clavicular angle (GACA) was introduced and used to quantify the horizontal clavicular dynamics in terms of angle differences. The unaffected shoulders served as the control group. Results: Superior dislocation of the lateral clavicle in the Zanca view was classified as Rockwood type II in 7 patients, type III in 15, and type V in 3. The axillary lateral view in a sitting position showed posterior dislocation of the distal clavicle in 8 patients (Rockwood type IV injury). Dynamic radiologic evaluation revealed an average GACA difference between the neutral and anterior position of the arm of 7.1° ± 5.5° for the unaffected shoulder. In the injured AC joints, 11 patients showed no radiologic evidence of horizontal instability (group A) with a GACA difference of 7.1° ± 4.8°. Increased anteroposterior translation was evident in 14 patients (group B) with a GACA difference of 30.3° ± 14.3° (P < .001). Conclusion: Functional axillary radiologic evaluation seems to represent a simple imaging tool to reveal dynamic horizontal instability. Clinical Relevance: Horizontal instability of the distal clavicle in acute AC joint injuries represents an indication for surgical treatment. Dynamic axillary radiologic evaluation may detect previously missed unstable injuries. This evaluation might be relevant when deciding on surgical AC joint stabilization.

Importance: The transscleral XEN Glaucoma Gel Microstent (XEN‐GGM, Allergan Plc., Parsippany, New Jersey) is implanted by a minimally invasive ab interno technique.Background: The present study aims to assess the long‐term clinical outcomes in patients after XEN‐GGM implantation.Design: This prospective, non‐randomized, multi‐centred study was conducted in three countries (Austria, Canada and Germany).Participants: Sixty‐four consecutive eyes of 64 patients with open angle glaucoma received the XEN‐GGM (63 μm) without Mitomycin C. Thirty‐five (55%) were solo procedures, and 29 (45%) were combined with cataract surgery.Methods: Visits were planned at baseline, 6 months, 1, 2, 3 and 4 years postoperatively.Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measures were mean intraocular pressure (IOP), mean number of IOP lowering medication. Secondary outcome parameters were: visual acuity, visual fields and complete surgical failure (defined as presence of a secondary IOP lowering procedure or loss of light perception) at 4 years, postoperatively.Results: Mean best‐medicated baseline IOP was 22.5 ± 4.2 mmHg and decreased significantly to 13.4 ± 3.1 mmHg 4 years postoperatively (−40%, n = 34, P < 0.001). Mean number of IOP lowering medication decreased significantly from 2.4 ± 1.3 preoperatively to 1.2 ± 1.3 (−50%, n = 34, P < 0.001) postoperatively. Visual field mean deviation showed no significant change between preoperative and postoperative examinations. Complete surgical failure rate per year was 10%.Conclusions and Relevance: The XEN‐GGM resulted in lower IOP and a reduction in medications from baseline over 4 years of follow‐up. There was no detectable decrease in visual fields over the study. The surgical failure rate is comparable to other filtration surgeries.