This work aimed to investigate whether treatment with the antidiabetic drug metformin would affect adenine-induced chronic kidney disease (CKD) in non-diabetic rats and rats with streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetes. Rats were randomly divided into eight groups, and given either normal feed, or feed mixed with adenine (0.25% w/w, for five weeks) to induce CKD. Some of these groups were also simultaneously treated orally with metformin (200 mg/kg/day). Rats given adenine showed the typical signs of CKD that included detrimental changes in several physiological and traditional and novel biochemical biomarkers in plasma urine and kidney homogenates such as albumin/creatinine ratio, N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, 8-isoprostane, adiponectin, cystatin C, as well as plasma urea, creatinine, uric acid, indoxyl sulfate, calcium, and phosphorus. Several indices of inflammation and oxidative stress, and renal nuclear factor-κB and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 levels were also measured. Histopathologically, adenine caused renal tubular necrosis and fibrosis. The activation of the intracellular mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway was inhibited in the groups that received metformin and STZ together, with or without adenine induced-CKD. Induction of diabetes worsened most of the actions induced by adenine. Metformin significantly ameliorated the renal actions induced by adenine and STZ when these were given singly, and more so when given together. The results suggest that metformin can be a useful drug in attenuating the progression of CKD in both diabetic and non-diabetic rats.

This study aimed to investigate the potential protective effects of diminazene, an activator of angiotensin II converting enzyme (ACE2), on kidney function and structure in rats with acute kidney injury (AKI) induced by the anticancer drug doxorubicin (DOX). The impact of diminazene was compared to that of two other drugs: the ACE inhibitor lisinopril and the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor blocker valsartan. Rats were subjected to a single intraperitoneal injection of DOX (13.5 mg/kg) on the 5th day, either alone or in combination with diminazene (15 mg/kg/day), lisinopril (10 mg/kg/day), or valsartan (30 mg/kg/day) for 8 consecutive days. Various markers related to kidney function, oxidative stress, and inflammation were measured in plasma and urine. Additionally, kidney tissues were assessed histopathologically. DOX-induced nephrotoxicity was confirmed by elevated levels of plasma urea, creatinine, and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL). DOX also led to increased urinary N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) activity and decreased creatinine clearance, albumin levels, and osmolality. Moreover, DOX caused a reduction in renal oxidative stress markers, including superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione reductase (GR), and catalase activities, while increasing malondialdehyde (MDA) levels. It also raised plasma inflammatory markers, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β). Concurrently administering diminazene significantly mitigated these DOX-induced changes, including histopathological alterations like renal tubule necrosis, tubular casts, shrunken glomeruli, and increased renal fibrosis. Similar protective effects were observed with lisinopril and valsartan. These protective effects, at least in part, appear to result from the anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties of these drugs. In summary, this study suggests that the administration of diminazene, lisinopril, or valsartan had comparable effects in ameliorating the biochemical and histopathological aspects of DOX-induced acute kidney injury in rats.

Background Cardiovascular diseases are responsible for a significant proportion of mortalities worldwide. Elderly patients are the most affected by cardiovascular diseases, and because of factors such as polypharmacy, multimorbidity, and age-related changes in drug availability and metabolism, they are highly susceptible to the occurrence of drug–drug interactions. Drug–drug interactions are among the many drug-related problems leading to negative outcomes among inpatients and outpatients. Thus, it is important to investigate the prevalence, involved drugs, and factors related to potential drug–drug interactions (pDDIs) to properly optimize pharmacotherapy regimens for these patients. Objective We aimed to determine the prevalence of pDDIs, drugs most frequently implicated, and significant predictors associated with these interactions among hospitalized patients in the Cardiology Unit at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital in Muscat, Oman. Methods This retrospective cross-sectional study included 215 patients. Micromedex Drug-Reax^® was used to identify pDDIs. Data extracted from patients’ medical records were collected and analyzed. Univariable and multivariable linear regression was applied to determine the predictors associated with the observed pDDIs. Results A total of 2057 pDDIs were identified, with a median of nine (5–12) pDDIs per patient. Patients with at least one pDDI accounted for 97.2% of all the included patients. The majority of pDDIs were of major severity (52.6%), fair level of documentation (45.5%), and pharmacodynamic basis (55.9%). Potential drug–drug interactions between atorvastatin and clopidogrel were the most frequently observed (9%). Of all the detected pDDIs, around 79.6% of them included at least one antiplatelet drug. Having diabetes mellitus as a comorbidity (B = 2.564, p < 0.001) and the number of drugs taken during the hospitalization period (B = 0.562, p < 0.001) were factors positively associated with the frequency of pDDIs. Conclusions Potential drug–drug interactions were highly prevalent among hospitalized cardiac patients at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman. Patients having diabetes as a comorbidity and with a high number of administered drugs were at a higher risk of an increased number of pDDIs.