ZELJKO TUKOVIC

Prof. ZELJKO TUKOVIC

University of Zagreb, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, Zagreb, Zagreb, Grad, Croatia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

1 October 2016 in Computers & Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PCPhilip Cardiff
Philip Cardiff
ZTZELJKO TUKOVIC
ZELJKO TUKOVIC
HJH. Jasak
H. Jasak
AIA. Ivanković
A. Ivanković

1 April 2018 in Computers & Fluids
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRMatthias Rauter
Matthias Rauter
ZTZELJKO TUKOVIC
ZELJKO TUKOVIC

1 August 2014 in International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TQTongran Qin
Tongran Qin
ZTZELJKO TUKOVIC
ZELJKO TUKOVIC
RGRoman O. Grigoriev
Roman O. Grigoriev

5 July 2012 in International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ZTZELJKO TUKOVIC
ZELJKO TUKOVIC
AIA. Ivanković
A. Ivanković
AKA. Karač
A. Karač

16 April 2007 in SAE International Journal of Advances and Current Practices in Mobility
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
PDF file
TLTommaso Lucchini
Tommaso Lucchini
GDGianluca D’Errico
Gianluca D’Errico
HJH. Jasak
H. Jasak
ZTZELJKO TUKOVIC
ZELJKO TUKOVIC
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) codes today represent consolidated tools that cover most physical and chemical processes which occur during operation of internal combustion engines under steady and unsteady conditions. Despite the availability of advanced physical models, the most demanding prerequisite for a CFD engine code is its flexibility in mesh structure and geometry handling capacity to accommodate moving boundaries. In fact, while the motion is solely defined on boundary points, most CFD approaches a-priori specify the position of every mesh vertex in the mesh for every time-step. Alternatives exist, most commonly using mesh generation techniques, like smoothing. In practice this is quite limiting, as it becomes difficult to prescribe solution-dependent motion or perform mesh motion on dynamically adapting meshes. To preserve the mesh quality during extreme boundary deformation due to piston and valve motion, the number of the cells in the mesh needs to be changed. For this reason a set of “topological changes” has been defined, allowing the possibility of attaching or detaching boundaries, adding or removing cell layers and using sliding mesh interfaces. This paper presents a new method of handling motion and topological changes in a moving-mesh Finite Volume Method (FVM). It consists of self-contained mesh topology modifiers which operate without direct “event” prescription and a vertex-based unstructured mesh motion solver. Mesh motion is determined by solving a motion equation with variable diffusion on mesh points, using a Finite Element method with polyhedral cell support. This guarantees that an initial valid mesh remains geometrically valid for arbitrary boundary motion. The proposed algorithms have been implemented in the OpenFOAM code, in order to perform mesh motion on the most common engine geometries. The proposed mesh setup relies on a static initial mesh which can be generated by standard commercial and open-source tools. The final part of the work concerns the application of the Finite Volume Method on moving meshes with topological changes, considering different test cases and preliminary results of the simulation of in-cylinder gas-exchange phase and combustion process for simplified geometries.