Zhang Yang

Dr. Zhang Yang

Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 August 2021 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YZYonghua ZHANG
Yonghua ZHANG
SBShuoben Bi
Shuoben Bi
LLLiping Liu
Liping Liu
Haonan ChenHaonan Chen
Haonan Chen
YZYi Zhang
Yi Zhang
SYShun Yao
Shun Yao
Heavy rain associated with landfalling typhoons often leads to disasters in South China, which can be reduced by improving the accuracy of radar quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE). At present, raindrop size distribution (DSD)-based nonlinear fitting (QPEDSD) and traditional neural networks are the main radar QPE algorithms. The former is not sufficient to represent the spatiotemporal variability of DSDs through the generalized Z–R or polarimetric radar rainfall relations that are established using statistical methods since such parametric methods do not consider the spatial distribution of radar observables, and the latter is limited by the number of network layers and availability of data for training the model. In this paper, we propose an alternative approach to dual-polarization radar QPE based on deep learning (QPENet). Three datasets of “dual-polarization radar observations—surface rainfall (DPO—SR)” were constructed using radar observations and corresponding measurements from automatic weather stations (AWS) and used for QPENetV1, QPENetV2, and QPENetV3. In particular, 13 × 13, 25 × 25, and 41 × 41 radar range bins surrounding each AWS location were used in constructing the datasets for QPENetV1, QPENetV2, and QPENetV3, respectively. For training the QPENet models, the radar data and AWS measurements from eleven landfalling typhoons in South China during 2017–2019 were used. For demonstration, an independent typhoon event was randomly selected (i.e., Merbok) to implement the three trained models to produce rainfall estimates. The evaluation results and comparison with traditional QPEDSD algorithms show that the QPENet model has a better performance than the traditional parametric relations. Only when the hourly rainfall intensity is less than 5 mm (R < 5 mm·h−1), the QPEDSD model shows a comparable performance to QPENet. Comparing the three versions of the QPENet model, QPENetV2 has the best overall performance. Only when the hourly rainfall intensity is less than 5 mm (R < 5 mm·h−1), QPENetV3 performs the best.

14 January 2019 in Atmosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YZYonghua Zhang
Yonghua Zhang
LLLiping Liu
Liping Liu
SBShuoben Bi
Shuoben Bi
ZWZhifang Wu
Zhifang Wu
PSPing Shen
Ping Shen
ZYZhang Yang
Zhang Yang
Typhoon rainstorms often cause disasters in southern China. Quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) with the use of polarimetric radar can improve the accuracy of precipitation estimation and enhance typhoon defense ability. On the basis of the observed drop size distribution (DSD) of raindrops, a comparison is conducted among the DSD parameters and the polarimetric radar observation retrieved from DSD in five typhoon and three squall line events that occurred in southern China from 2016 to 2017. A new piecewise fitting method (PFM) is used to develop the QPE estimators for landfall typhoons and squall lines. The performance of QPE is evaluated by two fitting methods for two precipitation types using DSD data collected. Findings indicate that the number concentration of raindrops in typhoon precipitation is large and the average diameter is small, while the raindrops in squall line rain have opposite characteristics. The differential reflectivity (ZDR) and specific differential phase (KDP) in these two precipitation types increase slowly with the reflectivity factor (ZH), whereas the two precipitation types have different ZDR and KDP in the same ZH. Thus, it is critical to fit the rainfall estimator for different precipitation types. Enhanced estimation can be obtained using the estimators for specific precipitation types, whether the estimators are derived from the conventional fitting method (CFM) or PFM, and the estimators fitted using the PFM can produce better results. The estimators for the developed polarimetric radar can be used in operational QPE and quantitative precipitation foresting, and they can improve disaster defense against typhoons and heavy rains.

22 August 2018 in Atmosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZYZhang Yang
Zhang Yang
LLLiping Liu
Liping Liu
HWHao Wen
Hao Wen
CWChong Wu
Chong Wu
YZYonghua Zhang
Yonghua Zhang
The development and application of operational polarimetric radar (PR) in China is still in its infancy. In this study, an operational PR quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) algorithm is suggested based on data for PR hydrometeor classification and local drop size distribution (DSD). Even though this algorithm performs well for conventional rainfall events, in which hourly rainfall accumulations are less than 50 mm, the capability of a PR to estimate extremely heavy rainfall remains unclear. The proposed algorithm is used for nine different types of rainfall events that occurred in Guangzhou, China, in 2016 and for an extremely heavy rainfall event that occurred in Guangzhou on 6 May 2017. It performs well for all data of these nine rainfall events and for light-to-moderate rain (hourly accumulation 50 mm) and the extremely heavy rain at stations where total rainfall exceeded 300 mm within 5 h in this extremely heavy rainfall event. To analyze the reasons for underestimation, a rain microphysics retrieval algorithm is presented to retrieve Dm and Nw from the PR measurements. The DSD characteristics and the factors affecting QPE are analyzed based on Dm and Nw. The results indicate that compared with statistical DSD data in Yangjiang (estimators are derived from these data), the average raindrop diameter during this rainfall event occurred on 6 May 2017 was much smaller and the number concentration was higher. The algorithm underestimated the precipitation with small and midsize particles, but overestimated the precipitation with midsize and large particles. Underestimations occurred when Dm and Nw are both very large, and the severe underestimations for heavy rain are mainly due to these particles. It is verified that some of these particles are associated with melting hail. Owing to the big differences in DSD characteristics, R(KDP, ZDR) underestimates most heavy rain. Therefore, R(AH), which is least sensitive to DSD variations, replaces R(KDP, ZDR) to estimate precipitation. This improved algorithm performs well even for extremely heavy rain. These results are important for evaluating S-band Doppler radar polarization updates in China.

30 October 2020 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZYZhang Yang
Zhang Yang
LLLiping Liu
Liping Liu
HWHao Wen
Hao Wen
The quality of radar data is crucial for its application. In particular, before radar mosaic and quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) can be conducted, it is necessary to know the quality of polarimetric parameters. The parameters include the horizontal reflectivity factor, ZH; the differential reflectivity factor, ZDR; the specific differential phase, KDP; and the correlation coefficient, ρHV. A novel radar data quality index (RQI) is specifically developed for the Chinese polarimetric radars. Not only the influences of partial beam blockages and bright band upon radar data quality, but also those of bright band correction performance, signal-to-noise ratio, and non-precipitation echoes are considered in the index. RQI can quantitatively describe the quality of various polarimetric parameters. A new radar mosaic QPE algorithm based on RQI is presented in this study, which can be used in different regions with the default values adjusted according to the characteristics of local radar. RQI in this algorithm is widely used for high-quality polarimetric radar data screening and mosaic data merging. Bright band correction is also performed to errors of polarimetric parameters caused by melting ice particles for warm seasons in this algorithm. This algorithm is validated by using nine rainfall events in Guangdong province, China. Major conclusions are as follows. ZH, ZDR, and KDP in bright band become closer to those under bright band after correction than before. However, the influence of KDP correction upon QPE is not as good as that of ZH and ZDR correction in bright band. Only ZH and ZDR are used to estimate precipitation in the bright band affected area. The new mosaic QPE algorithm can improve QPE performances not only in the beam blocked areas and the bright band affected area, which are far from radars, but also in areas close to the two radars. The sensitivity tests show the new algorithm can perform well and stably for any type of precipitation occurred in warm seasons. This algorithm lays a foundation for regional polarimetric radar mosaic precipitation estimation in China.

7 March 2021 in Atmosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NMNingkun Ma
Ningkun Ma
LLLiping Liu
Liping Liu
YCYichen Chen
Yichen Chen
ZYZhang Yang
Zhang Yang
A squall line is a type of strongly organized mesoscale convective system that can cause severe weather disasters. Thus, it is crucial to explore the dynamic structure and hydrometeor distributions in squall lines. This study analyzed a squall line over Guangdong Province on 6 May 2016 that was observed using a Ka-band millimeter-wave cloud radar (CR) and an S-band dual-polarization radar (PR). Doppler spectral density data obtained by the CR were used to retrieve the vertical air motions and raindrop size distribution (DSD). The results showed the following: First, the CR detected detailed vertical profiles and their evolution before and during the squall line passage. In the convection time segment (segment B), heavy rain existed with a reflectivity factor exceeding 35 dBZ and a velocity spectrum width exceeding 1.3 m s−1. In the PR detection, the differential reflectivity factor (Zdr) was 1–2 dB, and the large specific differential phase (Kdp) also represented large liquid water content. In the transition and stratiform cloud time segments (segments B and C), the rain stabilized gradually, with decreasing cloud tops, stable precipitation, and a 0 °C layer bright band. Smaller Kdp values (less than 0.9) were distributed around the 0 °C layer, which may have been caused by the melting of ice crystal particles. Second, from the CR-retrieved vertical air velocity, before squall line passage, downdrafts dominated in local convection and weak updrafts existed in higher-altitude altostratus clouds. In segment B, the updraft air velocity reached more than 8 m s−1 below the 0 °C layer. From segments C to D, the updrafts changed gradually into weak and wide-ranging downdrafts. Third, in the comparison of DSD values retrieved at 1.5 km and DSD values on the ground, the retrieved DSD line was lower than the disdrometer, the overall magnitude of the DSD retrieved was smaller, and the difference decreased from segments C to D. The standardized intercept parameter (Nw) and shape parameter (μ) of the DSD retrieved at 1.8 km showed good agreement with the disdrometer results, and the mass-weighted mean diameter (Dm) was smaller than that on the ground, but very close to the PR-retrieved Dm result at 2 km. Therefore, comparing with the DSD retrieved at around 2 km, the overall number concentration remained unchanged and Dm got larger on the ground, possibly reflecting the process of raindrop coalescence. Lastly, the average vertical profiles of several quantities in all segments showed that, first of all, the decrease of Nw and Dm with height in segments C and D was similar, reflecting the collision effect of falling raindrops. The trends were opposite in segment B, indicating that raindrops underwent intense mixing and rapid collision and growth in this segment. Then, PR-retrieved Dm profiles can verify the rationality of the CR-retrieved Dm. Finally, a vertical velocity profile peak generated a larger Dm especially in segments C and D.

30 June 2022 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZYZhang Yang
Zhang Yang
LLLiping Liu
Liping Liu
HWHao Wen
Hao Wen
BYBenchao Yu
Benchao Yu
HWHuiying Wang
Huiying Wang
YZYong Zhang
Yong Zhang
For quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) based on polarimetric radar (PR) and rain gauges (RGs), the quality of the radar data is crucial for estimation accuracy. This paper proposes a combined radar quality index (CRQI) to represent the quality of the radar data used for QPE and an algorithm that uses CRQI to improve the QPE performance. Nine heavy rainfall events that occurred in Guangdong Province, China, were used to evaluate the QPE performance in five contrast tests. The QPE performance was evaluated in terms of the overall statistics, spatial distribution, near real-time statistics, and microphysics. CRQI was used to identify good-quality data pairs (i.e., PR-based QPE and RG observation) for correcting estimators (i.e., relationships between the rainfall rate and the PR parameters) in real-time. The PR-based QPE performance was improved because estimators were corrected according to variations in the drop size distribution, especially for data corresponding to 1.1 mm < average Dm < 1.4 mm, and 4 < average log10Nw < 4.5. Some underestimations caused by the beam broadening effect, excessive beam height, and partial beam blockages, which could not be mitigated by traditional algorithms, were significantly mitigated by the proposed algorithm using CRQI. The proposed algorithm reduced the root mean square error by 17.5% for all heavy rainfall events, which included three precipitation types: convective precipitation (very heavy rainfall), squall line (huge raindrops), and stratocumulus precipitation (small but dense raindrops). Although the best QPE performance was observed for stratocumulus precipitation, the biggest improvement in performance with the proposed algorithm was observed for the squall line.