Zheng Lu

Prof. Zheng Lu

Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 August 2017 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HCHuizhen Cui
Huizhen Cui
LJLingmei Jiang
Lingmei Jiang
JDJinyang Du
Jinyang Du
SZShaojie Zhao
Shaojie Zhao
GWGongxue Wang
Gongxue Wang
JWJian Wang
Jian Wang

30 September 2023 in Environmental Pollution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Tao ChenTao Chen
Tao Chen
XWXiaocui Wen
Xiaocui Wen
JZJiawei Zhou
Jiawei Zhou
Zheng LuZheng Lu
Zheng Lu
XLXueying Li
Xueying Li
BYBo Yan
Bo Yan

1 March 2021 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JLJin Liu
Jin Liu
LCLinna Chai
Linna Chai
JDJianzhi Dong
Jianzhi Dong
DZDonghai Zheng
Donghai Zheng
Jean-Pierre WigneronJean-Pierre Wigneron
Jean-Pierre Wigneron
Zheng LuZheng Lu
Zheng Lu

10 July 2018 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XLXiang Li
Xiang Li
SLShaomin Liu
Shaomin Liu
HLHuaixiang Li
Huaixiang Li
YMYanfei Ma
Yanfei Ma
JWJianghao Wang
Jianghao Wang
ZGZhixia Guo
Zhixia Guo
Land surface evapotranspiration (ET) is an important component of the surface energy budget and water cycle. To solve the problem of the spatial‐scale mismatch between in situ observations and remotely sensed ET, it is necessary to find the most appropriate upscaling approach for acquiring ground truth ET data at the satellite pixel scale. Based on a data set from two flux observation matrices in the middle stream and downstream of the Heihe River Basin, six upscaling methods were intercompared via direct validation and cross validation. The results showed that the area‐weighted method performed better than the other five upscaling methods introducing auxiliary variables (the integrated Priestley‐Taylor equation, weighted area‐to‐area regression kriging [WATARK], artificial neural network, random forest [RF], and deep belief network methods) over homogeneous underlying surfaces. Over moderately heterogeneous underlying surfaces, the WATARK method performed better. However, the RF method performed better over highly heterogeneous underlying surfaces. A combined method (using the area‐weighted and WATARK methods for homogeneous and moderately heterogeneous underlying surfaces, respectively, and using the RF method for highly heterogeneous underlying surfaces) was proposed to acquire the daily ground truth ET data at the satellite pixel scale, and the errors in the ground truth ET data were evaluated. The Dual Temperature Difference (DTD) and ETMonitor were validated using ground truth ET data, which solve the problem of the spatial‐scale mismatch and quantify uncertainties in the validation process.

21 March 2019 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YQYuquan Qu
Yuquan Qu
Zhongli ZhuZhongli Zhu
Zhongli Zhu
LCLinna Chai
Linna Chai
SLShaomin Liu
Shaomin Liu
Carsten MontzkaCarsten Montzka
Carsten Montzka
JZJie Zheng
Jie Zheng
Time series of soil moisture (SM) data in the Qinghai–Tibet plateau (QTP) covering a period longer than one decade are important for understanding the dynamics of land surface–atmosphere feedbacks in the global climate system. However, most existing SM products have a relatively short time series or show low performance over the challenging terrain of the QTP. In order to improve the spaceborne monitoring in this area, this study presents a random forest (RF) method to rebuild a high-accuracy SM product over the QTP from 19 June 2002 to 31 March 2015 by adopting the advanced microwave scanning radiometer for earth observing system (AMSR-E), and the advanced microwave scanning radiometer 2 (AMSR2), and tracking brightness temperatures with latitude and longitude using the International Geosphere–Biospheres Programme (IGBP) classification data, the digital elevation model (DEM) and the day of the year (DOY) as spatial predictors. Brightness temperature products (from frequencies 10.7 GHz, 18.7 GHz and 36.5 GHz) of AMSR2 were used to train the random forest model on two years of Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) SM data. The simulated SM values were compared with third year SMAP data and in situ stations. The results show that the RF model has high reliability as compared to SMAP, with a high correlation (R = 0.95) and low values of root mean square error (RMSE = 0.03 m3/m3) and mean absolute percent error (MAPE = 19%). Moreover, the random forest soil moisture (RFSM) results agree well with the data from five in situ networks, with mean values of R = 0.75, RMSE = 0.06 m3/m3, and bias = −0.03 m3/m3 over the whole year and R = 0.70, RMSE = 0.07 m3/m3, and bias = −0.05 m3/m3 during the unfrozen seasons. In order to test its performance throughout the whole region of QTP, the three-cornered hat (TCH) method based on removing common signals from observations and then calculating the uncertainties is applied. The results indicate that RFSM has the smallest relative error in 56% of the region, and it performs best relative to the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS), and European Space Agency’s Climate Change Initiative (ESA CCI) project. The spatial distribution shows that RFSM has a similar spatial trend as GLDAS and ESA CCI, but RFSM exhibits a more distinct spatial distribution and responds to precipitation more effectively than GLDAS and ESA CCI. Moreover, a trend analysis shows that the temporal variation of RFSM agrees well with precipitation and LST (land surface temperature), with a dry trend in most regions of QTP and a wet trend in few north, southeast and southwest regions of QTP. In conclusion, a spatiotemporally continuous SM product with a high accuracy over the QTP was obtained.

1 March 2022 in Water Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YHYuan He
Yuan He
Zheng LuZheng Lu
Zheng Lu
WWWeijia Wang
Weijia Wang
DZDong Zhang
Dong Zhang
YZYunlin Zhang
Yunlin Zhang
XYXiaofan Yang
Xiaofan Yang