Arsenic (As) is considered one of the most toxic chemicals to both human and environmental health. Mining activities represent one of the main anthropogenic sources of As; the concentration of As in mine soil can reach 9300 mg kg⁻¹. To overcome the major issue of soil As pollution, soil restoration is required. Biological restoration approaches are generally more cost-effective and environmentally sustainable than physical and chemical methods. In particular, phytoremediation, an environmentally friendly technique based on the use of plants to uptake contaminants from soil, has been successfully implemented to restore As-contaminated soils at mine sites. However, mine soils are generally depleted in essential plant nutrients, such as nitrogen (N). Recent research suggests that phytoremediation can be combined with other techniques (physical, chemical, and biological) to enhance the N content and plant biomass. The aim of this review is to assess the current state of knowledge in the field of the restoration of arsenic-impacted mine site soils, focusing on phytoremediation. We critically assess recent work examining the potential of the co-application of amendments with phytoremediation and identify promising technologies and key research gaps. More studies are required to test the effectiveness of using various soil additives to enhance the phytoremediation of As, not only in pot-scale experiments but also in the field, to enable an improved management strategy for mine site restoration in the future.

In recent times, there has been increased focus on a holistic approach to soil remediation with consideration of social, economic and environmental factors. Consequently, there is a demand from practitioners and regulators alike for suitable ways to measure ancillary outcomes, for example, effects on soil quality. Here we show that biochar, when applied to land to remediate lead (Pb)-contaminated soils, can lead to environmental improvements not realized by adding mined or manufactured phosphates. Here, we study a Pb-contaminated soil amended with two phosphate fertilizers (slow- and fast-release) and with biochars produced from poultry litter and from biosolids at three temperatures (300 °C, 400 °C and 500 °C). The results show that, unlike the fast-release P fertilizer, biochars did not result in an increase in the amount of leachable P that could be released into the environment. Biochars prepared at 500 °C presented a higher value of the integrative geometric mean of soil enzyme activity, compared to the P fertilizers. Overall, our research shows that biochars, particularly those prepared at the higher temperature tested, are a suitable alternative to P fertilizers as an integrative remediation strategy in Pb-contaminated soils, enabling soil biological restoration.

Arsenic (As)-contaminated gold mine waste is a global problem and poses a significant risk to the ecosystem and community (e.g., carcinogenic, toxicity). Arsenic concentrations of 77,000 mg/kg and 22,000 mg/kg in mine waste have been reported for Canada and Australia, respectively. Research is investigating environmentally sustainable techniques to remediate As-rich mine waste. Biological techniques involving plants (phytoremediation) and soil amendments have been studied to bioaccumulate As from soil (phytoextraction) or stabilise As in the rhizosphere (phytostabilisation). Identified plant species for phytoremediation are predominately fern species, which are problematic for arid to semi-arid climates, typical of gold mining areas. There is a need to identify native plant species that are compatible with arid to semi-arid climates. Arsenic is toxic to plants; therefore, it is vital to assess soil amendments and their ability to reduce toxicity, enhance plant growth, and improve soil conditions. The effectiveness of a soil-amending phytoremediation technique is dependent on soil properties, geochemical background, and As concentrations/speciation; hence, it is vital to use field soil. There is a lack of studies involving mine waste soil collected from the field. Future research is needed to design soil-amending phytoremediation techniques with site-specific mine waste soil and native plant species.

Arsenic (As) in soil, such as mining waste, is a concern for communities with legacy contamination. While the chronic health effects of As exposure through drinking water are well documented, the association between As in soil and population-wide health impacts is complex, involving factors like soil accessibility, soil properties, and exposure modes. This review summarizes evidence of associations between As in soil and human health, as well as biomarker and bioaccessibility evidence of exposure pathways. Fourteen studies were included in the final analysis. Reviewed studies reported associations between As in soil and birth outcomes, neurological effects, DNA damage, and cancer. Some of these health outcomes are not known to be linked to As in drinking water and were reported over a range of soil concentrations, indicating inconsistencies. Higher soil As concentrations are associated with higher As in human biospecimens, suggesting direct and indirect soil ingestion as primary exposure pathways. The subpopulations more likely to be exposed include younger children and those involved in soil-based activities. Future research should focus on standardized epidemiological studies, longitudinal studies, soil exposure and mitigating factors, combined exposure biomarker studies, the behavior of the different As species, soil dose related to bioavailability/bioaccessibility, and effects with other elements.

Phytoremediation represents a potentially effective and environmentally friendly technology to remediate arsenic (As) in mine waste soils. However, soil amendments are often required to improve phytoremediation due to depleted nutrients in mine waste. This study aims to assess the effect of biosolids biochar, applied at different rates (0%, 5%, and 10%) on As phytoremediation using three plant species: Poa labillardieri, Rytidosperma caespitosum, and Juncus pauciflorus. This study was conducted in a replicated greenhouse pot study using soil from an abandoned mine site. Dry plant biomass, As concentration in plants and soil, and soil microbial abundance were investigated. Juncus pauciflorus produced eight times more root and shoot biomass than R. caespitosum in soils amended with 10% biochar. The highest As uptake was also observed in J. pauciflorus grown in soils amended with 10% biochar (7.10 mg/plant), while R. caespitosum had the lowest As uptake in soils without biochar (0.16 mg/plant). In soils amended with 10% biochar, the total bacterial community decreased to approximately 8.50 log₁₀ copies/g, compared to the initial soil (9.05 log₁₀ copies/g), while the number of gene copies of the nifH gene increased, suggesting the importance of nitrogen-fixing bacteria to promote plant growth. Taguchi analysis confirmed that plant species was the key factor for As phytoremediation, followed by biochar application dose. This study showed that J. pauciflorus and the addition of 10% biochar was the best treatment for remediating As-contaminated mine waste, offering the potential for use commercially. Moreover, the utilisation of biochar derived from biosolids as a soil amendment for enhancing phytoremediation represents good circular economy practice to manage excessive biosolids production.

Phytoremediation is a cost-effective and sustainable method for the remediation of minewaste contaminated with heavy metals such as arsenic (As). However, mine waste soil is often nutrient-limited, especially in nitrogen (N), impairing plant growth and phytoremediation. This study aimed to assess how planting density together with soil amendments, biochar, and an isolated indigenous nitrogen-fixing bacterium (NFB) (Bacillus subtilis) affect the efficacy of phytoremediation by Juncus pauciflorus of an As-contaminated mine waste soil from Bendigo, Victoria. Three plant densities, including 9, 26, and 44 plants/m², were grown in As-contaminated mine waste soil amended with biochar (10% w/w) and B. subtilis (8.1 × 10⁸ CFU/mL) and incubated for 100 days. Plant biomass, plant As uptake, soil As concentration, bacterial abundance (total and NFB using 16S and nifH gene copy numbers, respectively), and total soil N were assessed. Juncus pauciflorus at a higher density (44 plants/m²) promoted the greatest biomass and total As uptake, 70.22 g/m² and 209.53 mg/m², respectively. Plant density significantly influenced the root–shoot partitioning of As. Higher densities increased shoot uptake (BAF_soil→shoot), and TF_root→shoot values remained >1 across all treatments, confirming the active translocation of As to the shoots, suggesting both phytostabilisation and phytoextraction potential by J. pauciflorus. Planting density significantly reduced soil As, ranging from 8000 mg/kg to 9500 mg/kg, compared to the initial concentration (13,032 mg/kg). The abundance of 16S and nifH genes was stable among treatments, ranging from 7 log₁₀ copies/g to 12 log₁₀ copies/g. TN content in soils amended with 44 plants/m² contained the highest TN content at day 33, approximately 7000 mg/kg. This study is the first to report that higher planting density of J. pauciflorus amended with biochar and NFB provides the strongest phytoremediation performance in highly As-contaminated mine soil by enhancing As uptake and accumulation in aboveground biomass. Most importantly, the results show that plant density also regulates the plant’s remediation strategy, shifting J. pauciflorus between phytostabilisation at dense planting and greater phytoextraction at lower density. These findings support the use of native plants in combination with biochar and microbial amendment as a sustainable strategy for remediating As-contaminated mine waste.