Editor—We thank Prof. Priebe for his critical comments on our article.
1 Prof. Priebe is concerned that the title we used would be misleading as there was no direct comparison between the three solutions but between two colloids plus additional Ringer's lactate and Ringer's lactate alone. Although not explicitly mentioned in the title this procedural method is clearly stated in the Methods section under ‘Randomization, fluid regimen and blinding’. Because of the known upper limit regarding the daily dosage of hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4 it should be evident to the reader that the total fluid intake in the hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4 group cannot be achieved by administering solely study solution. Instead of comparing physiologically more identical solutions our approach was rather a pragmatic one as 5% human albumin, 6% hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4 and Ringer's lactate are frequently employed worldwide for this purpose. We do agree that it would have been more opportune to use a balanced hydroxyethylstarch solution as compared with the unbalanced solution we used, which contains a high concentration of chloride. The reason for our choice was again an overall more frequent use of unbalanced hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4 in those days. In fact, an equivalence study, comparing balanced and unbalanced hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4 had previously been performed at our institution.
2