Kerstin Zander

Dr. Kerstin Zander

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 July 2018 in Nature Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SGStephen T. Garnett
Stephen T. Garnett
NBNeil D. Burgess
Neil D. Burgess
JFJulia E. Fa
Julia E. Fa
ÁFÁlvaro Fernández-Llamazares
Álvaro Fernández-Llamazares
ZMZsolt Molnár
Zsolt Molnár
ILIan Leiper
Ian Leiper

4 May 2015 in Nature Climate Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Kerstin ZanderKerstin Zander
Kerstin Zander
WBWouter J. W. Botzen
Wouter J. W. Botzen
EOElspeth Oppermann
Elspeth Oppermann
TKTord Kjellstrom
Tord Kjellstrom
SGStephen T. Garnett
Stephen T. Garnett

6 January 2020 in Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JFJulia E. Fa
Julia E. Fa
JWJames Em Watson
James Em Watson
ILIan Leiper
Ian Leiper
PPPeter Potapov
Peter Potapov
TETom D Evans
Tom D Evans
SGStephen T Garnett
Stephen T Garnett
Intact Forest Landscapes (IFLs) are critical strongholds for the environmental services that they provide, not least for their role in climate protection. On the basis of information about the distributions of IFLs and Indigenous Peoples’ lands, we examined the importance of these areas for conserving the world's remaining intact forests. We determined that at least 36% of IFLs are within Indigenous Peoples’ lands, making these areas crucial to the mitigation action needed to avoid catastrophic climate change. We also provide evidence that IFL loss rates have been considerably lower on Indigenous Peoples’ lands than on other lands, although these forests are still vulnerable to clearing and other threats. World governments must recognize Indigenous Peoples’ rights, including land tenure rights, to ensure that Indigenous Peoples play active roles in decision‐making processes that affect IFLs on their lands. Such recognition is critical given the urgent need to reduce deforestation rates in the face of escalating climate change and global biodiversity loss.

5 March 2013 in Ecology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CPC. Packer
C. Packer
ALA. Loveridge
A. Loveridge
SCS. Canney
S. Canney
TCT. Caro
T. Caro
SGS.T. Garnett
S.T. Garnett
SPS. Polasky
S. Polasky

4 January 2019 in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TDThi Tam Duong
Thi Tam Duong
TBTom Brewer
Tom Brewer
JLJo Luck
Jo Luck
Kerstin ZanderKerstin Zander
Kerstin Zander
Farmers around the world face and manage a wide range of enterprise-related risks. These risks are increasing due to a range of factors including globalisation, increased trade in agricultural products, and climate change, jeopardising agricultural enterprises and forcing farmers to adjust their production and management strategies. Here we present results of a systematic literature review, following PRISMA protocol, of farmers’ perceptions of, and responses to, agricultural risks. Using data reduction method (factor analysis) and descriptive statistics, we analysed 197 studies and found that weather-related risk (55%), biosecurity threats (48%), and human risk (35%) are the significant risks perceived by farmers for their agricultural enterprises. Diversification of crop and animal production (28%) and pests and diseases monitoring and prevention (20%) were the preferred agricultural risk management strategies employed by farmers. Few studies have investigated socio-economic factors that explain risk perceptions (18%) or factors that influence how farmers manage agricultural risks (11%). The main barriers to successfully managing agricultural risks were limited access to information and formal low-interest loan systems, especially in developing countries. We identified a mismatch between perceived risk sources and risk management strategies, highlighting a need to improve understanding of why particular management responses are employed to address the various risks. This review suggests areas for future research to improve understanding of the perceptions of risks held by farmers, and to support efforts to manage and reduce these risks.

21 June 2018 in Climate
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JEJacquelyn F. Escarcha
Jacquelyn F. Escarcha
JLJonatan Lassa
Jonatan Lassa
Kerstin ZanderKerstin Zander
Kerstin Zander
We conducted a systematic literature review to document the scientific knowledge about climate change impacts and adaptation in livestock systems, and to identify research gaps. The analysis was built from the premise that livestock offers substantial opportunities for food security and sustainable development if adaptation to climate change is appropriated. In examining 126 suitable peer-reviewed publications we discovered five research gaps: (1) a lack of research in Asia and South America; (2) a lack of mutual investigation and linkages between impacts and adaptation; (3) a lack of emphasis on mixed crop-livestock systems; (4) a lack of emphasis on monogastric livestock; and (5) an underrepresentation of quantitative methods including yield impact models. The findings suggest that the research on climate change impacts and adaptation in livestock systems needs to move beyond certain geographical contexts and consider key vulnerability priorities, particularly from developing countries. It is pivotal that research begins to jointly look at climate change impacts and the livestock keepers’ adaptation to draw out policy implications and to effectively target support for impact-specific adaptation options. Only if such evidence is established, adaptation will be appropriated accordingly to the needs of the livestock sector, and provision for the growing demand of animal-based products will be secured.