The USAF requirements for the durability and damage tolerance certification for additively manufactured (AM) aircraft structural parts, which are detailed in Structures Bulletin EZ-19-01, raise a number of new and, as yet, unanswered questions. The present paper attempts to address three questions: How to perform a fracture mechanics-based analysis of crack growth in an AM part so as to account for the residual stresses, how to perform a fracture mechanics-based durability analysis of a cold spray repair so as to account for both the induced residual stresses and the presence of multiple co-located cracks, and how to perform a fracture mechanics-based durability analysis of an AM part so as to account for the presence of multiple collocated surface braking cracks. In this context, the present paper reveals the potential of the Hartman–Schijve variant of the NASGRO crack growth equation to accurately predict the growth of each of the individual (collocated) cracks that arose in a cold spray-repaired specimen and in a specimen from a crack that nucleated and grew from a rough surface.

The United States Air Force (USAF) Guidelines for the Durability and Damage Tolerance (DADT) certification of Additive Manufactured (AM) parts states that the most difficult challenge for the certification of an AM part is to establish an accurate prediction of its DADT. How to address this challenge is the focus of the present paper. To this end this paper examines the variability in crack growth in tests on additively manufactured (AM) Ti-6Al-4V specimens built using selective layer melting (SLM). One series of tests analysed involves thirty single edge notch tension specimens with five build orientations and two different post heat treatments. The other test program analysed involved ASTM standard single edge notch specimens with three different build directions. The results of this study highlight the ability of the Hartman–Schijve crack growth equation to capture the variability and the anisotropic behaviour of crack growth in SLM Ti-6Al-4V. It is thus shown that, despite the large variability in crack growth, the intrinsic crack growth equation remains unchanged and that the variability and the anisotropic nature of crack growth in this test program is captured by allowing for changes in both the fatigue threshold and the cyclic fracture toughness.

MIL‐STD 1530D requires that the certification of an aircraft part employ analytical tools that are capable of modeling crack growth. It is further stated that the durability and damage tolerance (DADT) analyses should be based on linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) and follow a building block approach. This paper illustrates the durability analysis required to certify an additively manufactured part by using the examples of durability tests performed on two wire arc additively manufactured (WAAM) 18Ni 250 Maraging steel specimens.

This paper firstly reveals that when assessing if a bonded joint meets the certification requirements inherent in MIL-STD-1530D and the US Joint Services Standard JSSG2006 it is necessary to ensure that: (a) There is no yielding at all in the adhesive layer at 115% of design limit load (DLL), and (b) that the joint must be able to withstand design ultimate load (DUL). Secondly, it is revealed that fatigue crack growth in both nano-reinforced epoxies, and structural adhesives can be captured using the Hartman–Schijve crack growth equation, and that the scatter in crack growth in adhesives can be modelled by allowing for variability in the fatigue threshold. Thirdly, a methodology was established for estimating a valid upper-bound curve, for cohesive failure in the adhesive, which encompasses all the experimental data and provides a conservative fatigue crack growth curve. Finally, it is shown that this upper-bound curve can be used to (a) compare and characterise structural adhesives, (b) determine/assess a “no growth” design (if required), (c) assess if a disbond in an in-service aircraft will grow and (d) to design and life in-service adhesively-bonded joints in accordance with the slow-growth approach contained in the United States Air Force (USAF) certification standard MIL-STD-1530D.

The durability assessment of additively manufactured parts needs to account for both surface-breaking material discontinuities and surface-breaking porosity and how these material discontinuities interact with parts that have been left in the as-built state. Furthermore, to be consistent with the airworthiness standards associated with the certification of metallic parts on military aircraft the durability analysis must be able to predict crack growth, as distinct from using a crack growth analysis in which parameters are adjusted so as to match measured data. To partially address this, the authors recently showed how the durability of wire arc additively manufactured (WAAM) 18Ni-250 maraging steel specimens, where failure was due to the interaction of small surface-breaking cracks with surface roughness, could be predicted using the Hartman–Schijve variant of the NASGRO crack growth equation. This paper illustrates how the same equation, with the same material parameters, can be used to predict the durability of a specimen where failure is due to surface-breaking porosity.

This paper summarises the findings of an investigation into the durability of cold spray repairs, also known as supersonic particle deposition or SPD repairs, to simulated corrosion damage in AA7075-T7351 aluminium alloy specimens. A feature of this paper is that it is the first to show how to perform the mandatory durability analysis of repaired corroded structures, where the corroded material is first removed by machining and then repaired using cold spray, in a fashion consistent with the requirements delineated in USAF Structures Bulletin EZ-19-01, MIL-STD-1530D, and the US Joint Services Structural Guidelines JSSG2006.