Juan Adrian Ramos Guivar

Prof. Dr. Juan Adrian Ramos Guivar

DAFES, Research Group NANOTECH, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2016 in Applied Surface Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Juan Adrian Ramos GuivarJuan Adrian Ramos Guivar
Juan Adrian Ramos Guivar
ESEdgar A. Sanches
Edgar A. Sanches
FBFlorian Bruns
Florian Bruns
ESElaheh Sadrollahi
Elaheh Sadrollahi
MMM.A. Morales
M.A. Morales
FLF. Jochen Litterst
F. Jochen Litterst

6 September 2021 in Nanomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YCYamerson c
Yamerson c
Angie Fiorella Mayta ArmasAngie Fiorella Mayta Armas
Angie Fiorella Mayta Armas
JPJemina Pomalaya-Velasco
Jemina Pomalaya-Velasco
YBYessica Bendezu
Yessica Bendezu
Jorge Andres Guerra TorresJorge Andres Guerra Torres
Jorge Andres Guerra Torres
Juan Adrian Ramos GuivarJuan Adrian Ramos Guivar
Juan Adrian Ramos Guivar
Various crystallite size estimation methods were used to analyze X-ray diffractograms of spherical cerium dioxide and titanium dioxide anatase nanoparticles aiming to evaluate their reliability and limitations. The microstructural parameters were estimated from several integral breadth methods such as Scherrer, Monshi, Williamson–Hall, and their variants: (i) uniform deformation model, (ii) uniform strain deformation model, and (iii) uniform deformation energy density model. We also employed the size–strain plot and Halder–Wagner method. For this purpose, an instrumental resolution function of an Al2O3 standard was used to subtract the instrumental broadening to estimate the crystallite sizes and strain, and the linear regression analysis was used to compare all the models based on the coefficient of determination. The Rietveld whole powder pattern decomposition method was introduced for comparison purposes, being the best candidate to fit the X-ray diffraction data of metal-oxide nanoparticles. Refined microstructural parameters were obtained using the anisotropic spherical harmonic size approach and correlated with the above estimation methods and transmission electron microscopy images. In addition, μ-Raman spectra were recorded for each material, estimating the mean crystallite size for comparison by means of a phonon confinement model.

1 June 2017 in RSC Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Juan Adrian Ramos GuivarJuan Adrian Ramos Guivar
Juan Adrian Ramos Guivar
ESElahe Sadrollahi
Elahe Sadrollahi
DMDirk Menzel
Dirk Menzel
EFEdson G. Ramos Fernandes
Edson G. Ramos Fernandes
ELElvis O. López
Elvis O. López
FLF. Jochen Litterst
F. Jochen Litterst
In this study, magnetic nanocomposites were developed and used as adsorbents for lead and copper from aqueous media. Structural, surface, magnetic and textural properties of functionalized maghemite nanoparticles synthesized by alkaline co-precipitation were studied. The surfaces of the iron oxide nanoparticles (Nps) were modified with different chemical agents such as fatty and amino acids, silica (SiO2), mesoporous silica (SBA-15), hydroxyapatite, multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), obtaining NPs with mean particle sizes ranging from 7 to 16 nm according to Rietveld refinement and TEM images analysis. The physicochemical surface properties of the functionalized materials were studied via zeta potential (ζ) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Mössbauer spectroscopy (MS) as a function of temperature and DC magnetometry were used to study the magnetic properties. The superparamagnetic relaxation was studied by MS. The resolved spectra at 20 K confirm the presence of nanomaghemite phase. Besides, the saturation magnetization varies from 12 to 62 emu g−1. A nitrogen adsorption–desorption technique was used to determine the specific surface area and to study the porous structure. The functionalized γ-Fe2O3 Nps exhibited a Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) specific surface area ranging from 74 to 214 m2 g−1 and revealed remarkable uptake capacities to remove Cu(II) and Pb(II) species from aqueous solutions.

1 October 2015 in Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Juan Adrian Ramos GuivarJuan Adrian Ramos Guivar
Juan Adrian Ramos Guivar
ESEdgar Aparecido Sanches
Edgar Aparecido Sanches
CMClaudio Jose Magon
Claudio Jose Magon
EFEdson G. Ramos Fernandes
Edson G. Ramos Fernandes

6 September 2021 in Nanomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Juan Adrian Ramos GuivarJuan Adrian Ramos Guivar
Juan Adrian Ramos Guivar
DFDiego Alberto Flores-Cano
Diego Alberto Flores-Cano
EPEdson Caetano Passamani
Edson Caetano Passamani
Arsenic and lead heavy metals are polluting agents still present in water bodies, including surface (lake, river) and underground waters; consequently, the development of new adsorbents is necessary to uptake these metals with high efficiency, quick and clean removal procedures. Magnetic nanoparticles, prepared with iron-oxides, are excellent candidates to achieve this goal due to their ecofriendly features, high catalytic response, specific surface area, and pulling magnetic response that favors an easy removal. In particular, nanomagnetite and maghemite are often found as the core and primary materials regarding magnetic nanoadsorbents. However, these phases show interesting distinct physical properties (especially in their surface magnetic properties) but are not often studied regarding correlations between the surface properties and adsorption applications, for instance. Thus, in this review, we summarize the main characteristics of the co-precipitation and thermal decomposition methods used to prepare the nano-iron-oxides, being the co-precipitation method most promising for scaling up processes. We specifically highlight the main differences between both nano-oxide species based on conventional techniques, such as X-ray diffraction, zero and in-field Mössbauer spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, X-ray absorption spectroscopy, and X-ray magnetic circular dichroism, the latter two techniques performed with synchrotron light. Therefore, we classify the most recent magnetic nanoadsorbents found in the literature for arsenic and lead removal, discussing in detail their advantages and limitations based on various physicochemical parameters, such as temperature, competitive and coexisting ion effects, i.e., considering the simultaneous adsorption removal (heavy metal–heavy metal competition and heavy metal–organic removal), initial concentration, magnetic adsorbent dose, adsorption mechanism based on pH and zeta potential, and real water adsorption experiments. We also discuss the regeneration/recycling properties, after-adsorption physicochemical properties, and the cost evaluation of these magnetic nanoadsorbents, which are important issues, but less discussed in the literature.

1 October 2018 in Applied Surface Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Juan Adrian Ramos GuivarJuan Adrian Ramos Guivar
Juan Adrian Ramos Guivar
ADAngel Bustamante D.
Angel Bustamante D.
JGJ.C. Gonzalez
J.C. Gonzalez
ESEdgar A. Sanches
Edgar A. Sanches
MMM.A. Morales
M.A. Morales
AAAmaya Arencibia
Amaya Arencibia