In lead optimization, protein crystallography is an indispensable tool to analyze drug binding. Binding modes and non‐covalent interaction inventories are essential to design follow‐up synthesis candidates. Two protocols are commonly applied to produce protein–ligand complexes: cocrystallization and soaking. Because of its time and cost effectiveness, soaking is the more popular method. Taking eight ligand hinge binders of protein kinase A, we demonstrate that cocrystallization is superior. Particularly for flexible proteins, such as kinases, and larger ligands cocrystallization captures more reliable the correct binding pose and induced protein adaptations. The geometrical discrepancies between soaking and cocrystallization appear smaller for fragment‐sized ligands. For larger flexible ligands that trigger conformational changes of the protein, soaking can be misleading and underestimates the number of possible polar interactions due to inadequate, highly impaired positions of protein amino‐acid side and main chain atoms. Thus, if applicable cocrystallization should be the gold standard to study protein–ligand complexes.

In recent years, crystallographic fragment screening has matured into an almost routine experiment at several modern synchrotron sites. The hits of the screening experiment,i.e.small molecules or fragments binding to the target protein, are revealed along with their 3D structural information. Therefore, they can serve as useful starting points for further structure-based hit-to-lead development. However, the progression of fragment hits to tool compounds or even leads is often hampered by a lack of chemical feasibility. As an attractive alternative, compound analogs that embed the fragment hit structurally may be obtained from commercial catalogs. Here, a workflow is reported based on filtering and assessing such potential follow-up compounds by template docking. This means that the crystallographic binding pose was integrated into the docking calculations as a central starting parameter. Subsequently, the candidates are scored on their interactions within the binding pocket. In an initial proof-of-concept study using five starting fragments known to bind to the aspartic protease endothiapepsin, 28 follow-up compounds were selected using the designed workflow and their binding was assessed by crystallography. Ten of these compounds bound to the active site and five of them showed significantly increased affinity in isothermal titration calorimetry of up to single-digit micromolar affinity. Taken together, this strategy is capable of efficiently evolving the initial fragment hits without major synthesis efforts and with full control by X-ray crystallography.