Przemysław Bukowski

Prof. Przemysław Bukowski

Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Life Sciences and Technology, Wroclaw, Poland
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 September 2024 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KWKinga Wieczorek
Kinga Wieczorek
PBPrzemysław Bukowski
Przemysław Bukowski
KSKrystian Stawinski
Krystian Stawinski
IRIwona Ryłko
Iwona Ryłko
Polyurethane foams constitute highly problematic waste due to their low density and consequently large volume. Among the most promising recycling approaches, the glycolysis of polyurethane waste stands out and was extensively discussed in this article. Existing literature reviews lack a detailed analysis of glycolysis processes and a clear presentation of the most important data. However, in this review, the scientific literature on glycolysis has been thoroughly examined and updated with the latest research in the field. The article provides an overview of glycolysis methods, categorized into rigid and flexible foams, along with a review of the catalysts and process conditions employed. Additionally, this study offers a comprehensive analysis of industrial methods protected by active patents, which has not been previously explored in the literature. This detailed examination of patent information adds significant value to the review and distinguishes it from others. Furthermore, this review also aims to introduce the main types of polyurethanes and their properties. It outlines the fundamentals of recycling strategies, thermomodernization trends, and environmental considerations, highlighting the critical role of recycling in the industry. The article serves as a complete foundation for exploring new alternative methods in this field.

4 August 2020 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BKBernard Knutel
Bernard Knutel
APAnna Pierzyńska
Anna Pierzyńska
MDMarcin Dębowski
Marcin Dębowski
PBPrzemysław Bukowski
Przemysław Bukowski
Arkadiusz DyjakonArkadiusz Dyjakon
Arkadiusz Dyjakon
This paper presents a series of economic efficiency studies comparing three different investment variants: without energy storage, with energy stored in batteries and hydrogen installation with a PEM fuel cell stack for a location in Poland. To reach a target, the current solar potential in Poland, the photovoltaic (PV) productivity, the capacity of the energy storage in batteries as well as the size of the hydrogen production system were calculated. The solar potential was determined using archival meteorological data and the Krieg estimation method. A laboratory scale PV system (1 kW) was used to estimate the decrease in real solar installation power during the last 10 years of operation. All analyses were made for a 100 kW photovoltaic array located in Poland using static and dynamic methods of investment project assessment, such as Simply Bay Back Period (SPBP) or Net Present Value (NPV). The results showed that the SPBP amounted to 8.8 years and NPV 54,896 € for non-storage systems. Whereas, for systems with energy stored the economic indexes were, as follow: SPBP = never, NPV = 183,428 € for batteries and SPBP = 14.74 years, NPV = 22,639 € for hydrogen/fuel cell installation. Storage in hydrogen is more advantageous than batteries due to the smaller investment outlays.

1 February 2018 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Sylwia Stegenta-DąbrowskaSylwia Stegenta-Dąbrowska
Sylwia Stegenta-Dąbrowska
MDMarcin Dębowski
Marcin Dębowski
PBPrzemysław Bukowski
Przemysław Bukowski
PRPeter Randerson
Peter Randerson
Andrzej BialowiecAndrzej Bialowiec
Andrzej Bialowiec

21 January 2022 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BGBłażej Piotr Gaze
Błażej Piotr Gaze
BKBernard Knutel
Bernard Knutel
KZKrzysztof Zając
Krzysztof Zając
MJMateusz Jajczyk
Mateusz Jajczyk
PBPrzemysław Bukowski
Przemysław Bukowski
This paper presents the results of research on exhaust gases from landfill gas combustion. The measurements were carried out in a reclaimed landfill in Kiełcz (a passive degassing system based on gas flare). The research concerned the effects of selected exhaust gas purification technologies (platinum catalyzer on a ceramic carrier, molecular sieve, copper(II) oxide) for the quality of exhaust gases, and their particulate matter content. This paper aims to indicate which catalytic systems are most suitable for this gas type and their most efficient positioning in the flue gas duct. Due to increasingly stringent emission standards, the outcomes presented in this article could be helpful for landfill owners who wish to avoid paying fines for not complying with applicable limits. The measurements were carried out using a flue gas analyser, a particulate matter analyser fitted with a probe, and four thermocouples connected with the data recorder. The research outcomes determined the percentage reduction of pollutant emissions into the atmosphere (CO, NOx, and particulate matter) using catalysts. The potential benefits of using catalysts in landfill gas combustion systems due to their operating temperature ranges are discussed.

19 July 2021 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MDMarcin Dębowski
Marcin Dębowski
PBPrzemysław Bukowski
Przemysław Bukowski
PKPrzemysław Kobel
Przemysław Kobel
JBJerzy Bieniek
Jerzy Bieniek
LRLeszek Romański
Leszek Romański
BKBernard Knutel
Bernard Knutel
The calculation method commonly used in the industry takes into consideration mainly fuel consumption (excluding electricity) and the amount of removed moisture which is reflected in the unit MJ·(Mg·%)−1. This is not a scientific approach because the result will change if the basic moisture is different (drying from 21% to 18% will consume less energy than drying from 18% to 15%). This paper aims to compare the energy consumption of two industrial continuous flow grain dryers powered by LPG and hard coal based on a comprehensive approach to energy efficiency calculation enriched with electricity consumption, flow measurements, and control of grain moisture. It could be useful for manufacturers who could use this method to generate more reliable data in their product datasheets, and it could also be legally regulated as an appropriate tool for calculating the energy consumption of agricultural grain dryers. According to the approach presented in this paper, the S428.CS construction powered by LPG gas had an energy consumption that was 6.14% lower than the DT2532 dryer construction, which used hard coal.

15 April 2017 in Revista de Chimie
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AFAlexandru Filipovici
Alexandru Filipovici
DTDumitru Tucu
Dumitru Tucu
Andrzej BialowiecAndrzej Bialowiec
Andrzej Bialowiec
PBPrzemysław Bukowski
Przemysław Bukowski
GCGeorge Catalin Crisan
George Catalin Crisan
MDMarcin Debowski
Marcin Debowski
Alexandru Filipovici, Dumitru Tucu, Andrzej Bialowiec, Przemyslaw Bukowski, George Catalin Crisan, Septimiu Lica, Jakub Pulka, Arkadiusz Dyjakon, Marcin Debowski - Effect of Temperature and Heating Rate on the Char Yield in Sorghum and Straw Slow Pyrolysis