Desirée Mena-Tudela

Dr. Desirée Mena-Tudela

Jaume I University of Castellón (UJI)
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Desirée Mena-TudelaDesirée Mena-Tudela
Desirée Mena-Tudela
SCSusana Iglesias Casas
Susana Iglesias Casas
Víctor Manuel González-ChordáVíctor Manuel González-Chordá
Víctor Manuel González-Chordá
ACAgueda Cervera-Gasch
Agueda Cervera-Gasch
LALaura Andreu-Pejó
Laura Andreu-Pejó
María Jesús Valero-ChillerónMaría Jesús Valero-Chillerón
María Jesús Valero-Chillerón
The decentralization of health systems can have direct repercussions on maternity care. Some inequalities can be noted in outcomes, like neonatal and child mortality in Spain. This study aimed to make the presence of obstetric violence in Spain visible as an interterritorial equity criterion. A descriptive, restrospective and cross-sectional study was conducted between January 2018 and June 2019. The sample comprised 17,541 questionnaires, which represented all Spanish Autonomous Communities. Of our sample, 38.3% perceived having suffered obstetric violence; 44.4% perceived that they had undergone unnecessary and/or painful procedures, of whom 83.4% were not requested to provide informed consent. The mean satisfaction with the attention women received obtained 6.94 points in the general sample and 4.85 points for those women who viewed themselves as victims of obstetric violence. Spain seems to have a serious problem with public health and respecting human rights in obstetric violence. Offering information to women and requesting their informed consent are barely practiced in the healthcare system, so it is necessary to profoundly reflect on obstetric practices with, and request informed consent from, women in Spain.

1 September 2020 in Nurse Education Today
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ACAgueda Cervera-Gasch
Agueda Cervera-Gasch
Víctor Manuel González-ChordáVíctor Manuel González-Chordá
Víctor Manuel González-Chordá
Desirée Mena-TudelaDesirée Mena-Tudela
Desirée Mena-Tudela

1 May 2019 in Nurse Education Today
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
María Jesús Valero-ChillerónMaría Jesús Valero-Chillerón
María Jesús Valero-Chillerón
Víctor Manuel González-ChordáVíctor Manuel González-Chordá
Víctor Manuel González-Chordá
NLNatividad López-Peña
Natividad López-Peña
ACAgueda Cervera-Gasch
Agueda Cervera-Gasch
MSMaría Pilar Suárez-Alcázar
María Pilar Suárez-Alcázar
Desirée Mena-TudelaDesirée Mena-Tudela
Desirée Mena-Tudela

Desirée Mena-TudelaDesirée Mena-Tudela
Desirée Mena-Tudela
ACAgueda Cervera-Gasch
Agueda Cervera-Gasch
MAMaría José Alemany-Anchel
María José Alemany-Anchel
LALaura Andreu-Pejó
Laura Andreu-Pejó
Víctor Manuel González-ChordáVíctor Manuel González-Chordá
Víctor Manuel González-Chordá
Background: Obstetric violence could be defined as the dehumanized treatment or abuse of health professionals towards the body or reproductive process of women. Some practices associated with obstetric violence have been routinely standardized and do not include the woman in decision making. This type of violence has consequences for the health of both the mother and the baby and that of the professionals who practice or observed it. Methods: A questionnaire consisting of 33 items that measured perception through a Likert scale was developed. Some sociodemographic variables were collected. The instrument was applied to a sample of nursing, medicine and midwifery students to determine its psychometric properties. Results: The final sample consisted of 153 students. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (p = 0.918) and Barlett tests (p ≤ 0.001) allowed for factor analysis, which explained 54.47% of the variance in two factors called protocolized-visible obstetric violence and non-protocolized-invisible obstetric violence. Conclusions: The PercOV-S (Perception of Obstetric Violence in Students) instrument was validated. The distribution and content of the two factors are closely related to obstetric violence against women. The existence of statistically significant relationships between the sociodemographic variables collected and the global measurements, domains and items of the PercOV-S scale highlight the normalization of obstetric violence as a central factor for future studies.

21 April 2022 in Genome Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMarta Selma-Royo
Marta Selma-Royo
CBChristine Bäuerl
Christine Bäuerl
Desirée Mena-TudelaDesirée Mena-Tudela
Desirée Mena-Tudela
LALaia Aguilar-Camprubí
Laia Aguilar-Camprubí
Francisco José PerezFrancisco José Perez
Francisco José Perez
MCMaria Carmen Collado
Maria Carmen Collado
Background: Breast milk is a vehicle to transfer protective antibodies from the lactating mother to the neonate. After SARS-CoV-2 infection, virus-specific IgA and IgG have been identified in breast milk, however, there are limited data on the impact of different COVID-19 vaccine types in lactating women. This study is aimed to evaluate the time course of induction of SARS-CoV-2-specific IgA and IgG in breast milk after vaccination. Methods: In this prospective observational study in Spain, 86 lactating women from priority groups receiving the vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 were included. Breast milk samples were collected longitudinally at seven or eight-time points (depending on vaccine type). A group with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (n=19) and a group of women from pre-pandemic time (n=20) were included for comparison. Results: Eighty-six vaccinated lactating women [mean age, 34.6 ± 3.7 years] of whom 96% were Caucasian and 92% were healthcare workers. A total number of 582 milk samples were included, and vaccine distribution was BioNTech/Pfizer (BNT162b2, n=34), Moderna (mRNA-1273, n=20), and AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, n=32). For each vaccine, 7 and 8 longitudinal time points were collected from baseline up to 30 days after the second dose for mRNA vaccines and adenovirus-vectored vaccines, respectively. A strong reactivity was observed for IgG and IgA after vaccination mainly after the 2nd dose. The presence and persistence of specific SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in breast milk were dependent on the vaccine type, with higher IgG and IgA levels in mRNA-based vaccines when compared to AstraZeneca, and on previous virus exposure. High intra- and inter-variability were observed, being relevant for IgA antibodies. In milk from vaccinated women, anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG was significantly higher while IgA levels were lower than in milk from COVID-19-infected women. Women with previous COVID-19 increased their IgG antibodies levels after the first dose to a similar level observed in vaccinated women after the second dose. Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccination induced anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgA and IgG in breast milk with higher levels after the 2nd dose. Levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgA and IgG are dependent on the vaccine type. Further studies are warranted to demonstrate the protective antibody effect against COVID-19 in infants from vaccinated and infected mothers. Trial registration: NCT04751734 (date of registration is on February 12, 2021)

Desirée Mena-TudelaDesirée Mena-Tudela
Desirée Mena-Tudela
SCSusana Iglesias Casas
Susana Iglesias Casas
Víctor Manuel González-ChordáVíctor Manuel González-Chordá
Víctor Manuel González-Chordá
ACAgueda Cervera-Gasch
Agueda Cervera-Gasch
LALaura Andreu-Pejó
Laura Andreu-Pejó
María Jesús Valero-ChillerónMaría Jesús Valero-Chillerón
María Jesús Valero-Chillerón
Background: obstetric violence can partially be represented by the high number of interventions and medicalization rates during the birthing process. The objective of the present study was to determine the interventionism and medicalization levels during childbirth in Spain. Methods: a descriptive, retrospective, and cross-sectional study was conducted between January 2018 and June 2019. Results: the intervention percentages were 34.2% for Kristeller maneuver and 39.3% for episiotomy. Differences appeared in public, private, and mixed healthcare settings (p < 0.001). The mean satisfaction, with healthcare in the different settings, was estimated at 6.88 points (SD ± 2.146) in public healthcare, 4.76 points (SD ± 3.968) in private healthcare, and 8.03 points (SD ± 1.930) in mixed healthcare (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found in Spanish autonomous communities. Conclusions: births in Spain seem to be highly intervened. In this study, a certain equity criterion was found concerning interventionism during childbirth in Spain. Healthcare influenced female intervention, satisfaction, and perception levels for obstetric violence; this evidences that female empowerment plays an important role.