Dessalegn Geleta

Mrs. Dessalegn Geleta


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 July 2022 in Applied and Environmental Soil Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MLMegersa Kebede Leta
Megersa Kebede Leta
DGDessalegn Geleta
Dessalegn Geleta
MRMotuma Shiferaw Regasa
Motuma Shiferaw Regasa
The hydrological model is an important tool in water resource management, allocation, and prediction. However, the hydrological models are subject to the uncertainty resulting from different sources of errors involved in the large number of parameters. The hydrological models in the management of water resources play a very significant role in quantifying uncertainty. Therefore, uncertainty analysis implementation is essential to advance confidence in modeling before performing the hydrological simulation. The purpose of the study was to assess the uncertainty parameters for the streamflow using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) hydrological model integrated sequential uncertainty fitting (SUFI-2) algorithm to Nashe watershed located in the Northwestern, Upper Blue Nile River Basin. The required input data for this study were digital elevation model, land use, soil map and data, meteorological data (precipitation, minimum and maximum temperature, wind speed, solar radiation, and relative humidity), and streamflow data. The calibration and validation model was computed to simulate the observed streamflow data from 1985 to 2008 including two years of warm-up periods. Model calibration, validation, and analysis of parameter uncertainty were conducted for both daily and monthly observed streamflows at the gauging stations through SUFI-2, which is one of the algorithms of the SWAT-Calibration and Uncertainty Program (SWAT_CUP). The results show that CN_2, GW_DELAY, ALPHA_BNK, CH_N2, and SOL_AWC were the most sensitive parameter for the monthly period and had a great impact on the streamflow simulation. Modeling results indicated that the method provides better results for the monthly time period than the daily time period for both calibration and validation. The result indicated that R2 and NSE were 0.89 and 0.85 and 0.82 and 0.79, respectively, monthly and daily during the calibration. The validation likewise demonstrated a good performance with R2 and NSE results of 0.88 and 0.78 and 0.85 and 0.76, respectively, for monthly and daily time periods. The results of this study provide a scientific reference based on uncertainty analysis to decision-makers to improve the decision support process in river basin management.

15 November 2022 in Geofluids
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DGDessalegn Geleta
Dessalegn Geleta
WFWorku Firomsa
Worku Firomsa
The surface water is contaminated by a variety of synthetic organic and inorganic compounds, chemicals, and nutrients; due to this reason, the quality of the water resources of Ethiopia is declining at an alarming rate, resulting in severe environmental degradation. The main objective of the study was to recognize the pollution status river for the study area by physicochemical parameters and the extent of microbial environmental matrices. The experiment was conducted using a complete randomized model with three composite replicates in each site, and water samples were collected from six different sampling sites using the American Public Health Association (APHA) technique. Water quality parameters were analyzed by the standard method of examination, whereas same examination was determined on site (in situ) (pH, Temp, Conductivity, and Turbidity), whereas TSS, COD, BOD, nitrate, alkali, and orthophosphate were identified in the laboratory. The relationship between physicochemical and benthos assemblages as bio indicators of ecohydrological river water quality was investigated using Spearman’s median rank correlation. The output of the study reveals that there was a negatively significant difference in effect between the sample and all the sites of the river. Physicochemical results of the river indicate Temp (23.62), EC (101.42), nitrate (2.175), and orthophosphates (0.081) were below the standard guidelines; however, turbidity (8.41), BOD (784.5), and alkali (396.5) were above the standard. Same of the water quality values for this study were ranges within the standard, DO (5.11), and pH (7.66). The benthos assemblage communities of the ecohydrological area were more influenced by the influents, and the macroinvertebrate index of all sample sites indicates the Shannon and Simpson diversity indices; result shows that the river was lightly polluted.



18 February 2021 in EGUsphere
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
DGDessalegn Geleta
Dessalegn Geleta
FFFekadu Fufa
Fekadu Fufa
The study evaluates the hydraulic analysis of water supply distribution network using water GEMS v8i. which used for modeling and Simulation of hydraulic parameters in the distribution networks. The hydraulic parameters which analyzed by using this software were junction pressure, velocity of water in networking system, and nodal demands and the overall result of water supply did not satisfied demand. The water distribution system has been analyzed for steady state and extended period simulation for the present population scenario for intermittent water supply using water Gems v8i. About 14 percent of the total number of nodes analyzed had negative pressures while 68 percent of the nodes had pressures less than the adopted pressure for the analysis. These negative pressures indicate that there is inadequate head within the distribution network for water conveyance to all the sections. In the same manner 85.6 percent of flow velocities in the pipes were within the adopted velocity while around 14.4 percent of the velocities exceeded the adopted velocity. The results in this study revealed that the performance of the water distribution system of under current demand is inefficient.

2 August 2021 in Research Square
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
DGDessalegn Geleta
Dessalegn Geleta
The key sources of water supply are rainwater, underground water and surface water. Rooftop rainwater harvesting is a technique through which the rain is captured from the roof catchments. The objective of this study was to investigate rooftop rainwater harvesting potential for domestic purposes using a samsamwater tool. This can be used in dry and wet seasonal situations based on the roof size and population density, which plays a crucial role in socioeconomic development and keeping community school welfare. Rooftop rainwater harvesting is the most reliable, easiest to access, and suitable source for water supply. This study was carried out from June 2018 to December 2019 based on a case study of three Jimma University Institute of Technology Kito furdisa campus. Since then, rainfall data, rooftop catchment, water consumption and water demand data have been used as inputs. Based on the findings, the annual rainfall is 1846 mm. The total roof size of the school is 888.32 m2 and almost the entire age of the building ranges between 5-15 years. It has been constructed of galvanized iron in which its run off coefficient is estimated at 90%. The collected data has been analyzed using different tools, including the Samsamwater RWH model, and SPSS statistics version 22. As a result, the volume of harvested rainwater was 12,826 m3/yr., which covered all non-potable water needs for 14,458 of the school population. The total yearly water requirement for a working day (182 days) and working days plus no working days (365 days) of the school is 18,606.72 and 26,759.47 m3/yr. respectively. The reliability of harvested rainwater from the rooftop for the community school can meet about 63.4 % of the water scarcity reduced by feeding for (365days). Whereas the reliability of rainwater-harvested potential is, 82% of water demand can be met by considering the schedule of working days (9 months). The average reliable for the study area is greater than 72.6% of water demand.