Paul Windisch

Dr. Paul Windisch

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 August 2019 in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MRManuel Röhrich
Manuel Röhrich
ALAnastasia Loktev
Anastasia Loktev
AWAnnika K. Wefers
Annika K. Wefers
AAAnnette Altmann
Annette Altmann
Daniel PaechDaniel Paech
Daniel Paech
UHUwe Haberkorn
Uwe Haberkorn

4 June 2020 in Neuroradiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PWPaul Windisch
Paul Windisch
PWPascal Weber
Pascal Weber
CFChristoph Fürweger
Christoph Fürweger
FEFelix Ehret
Felix Ehret
MKMarkus Kufeld
Markus Kufeld
AMAlexander Muacevic
Alexander Muacevic

20 March 2017 in Oncogene
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VTV Thewes
V Thewes
RSR Simon
R Simon
MHM Hlevnjak
M Hlevnjak
MSM Schlotter
M Schlotter
PSP Schroeter
P Schroeter
MTM Tönjes
M Tönjes

26 October 2018 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SASebastian Adeberg
Sebastian Adeberg
Semi B HarrabiSemi B Harrabi
Semi B Harrabi
NBNina Bougatf
Nina Bougatf
VVVivek Verma
Vivek Verma
PWPaul Windisch
Paul Windisch
SRStefan Rieken
Stefan Rieken
(1) Background: Selecting patients that will benefit the most from proton radiotherapy (PRT) is of major importance. This study sought to assess dose reductions to numerous organs-at-risk (OARs) with PRT, as compared to three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), as a function of tumor location. (2) Materials/Methods: Patients with intracranial neoplasms (all treated with PRT) were stratified into five location-based groups (frontal, suprasellar, temporal, parietal, posterior cranial fossa; n = 10 per group). Each patient was re-planned for 3DCRT and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using similar methodology, including the originally planned target and organ-at-risk (OAR) dose constraints. (3) Results: In parietal tumors, PRT showed the most pronounced dose reductions. PRT lowered doses to nearly every OAR, most notably the optical system and several contralateral structures (subventricular zone, thalamus, hippocampus). For frontal lobe cases, the greatest relative dose reductions in mean dose (Dmean) with PRT were to the infratentorial normal brain, contralateral hippocampus, brainstem, pituitary gland and contralateral optic nerve. For suprasellar lesions, PRT afforded the greatest relative Dmean reductions to the infratentorial brain, supratentorial brain, and the whole brain. Similar results could be observed in temporal and posterior cranial fossa disease. (4) Conclusions: The effectiveness and degree of PRT dose-sparing to various OARs depends on intracranial tumor location. These data will help to refine selection of patients receiving PRT, cost-effectiveness, and future clinical toxicity assessment.

1 September 2020 in Radiotherapy and Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PWPaul Windisch
Paul Windisch
MRManuel Röhrich
Manuel Röhrich
SRSebastian Regnery
Sebastian Regnery
ETEric Tonndorf-Martini
Eric Tonndorf-Martini
THThomas Held
Thomas Held
SASebastian Adeberg
Sebastian Adeberg
Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP)-specific Positron Emission Tomography (PET) has shown promising results in various cancers. This pilot study compares FAP-specific PET to MRI for treatment planning in 13 Glioblastoma patients. The resulting incongruent volumes could provide additional information for radiotherapy or biopsy planning.

19 February 2021 in EJNMMI Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PWPaul Windisch
Paul Windisch
DZDaniel R. Zwahlen
Daniel R. Zwahlen
FGFrederik L. Giesel
Frederik L. Giesel
ESEberhard Scholz
Eberhard Scholz
PLPatrick Lugenbiel
Patrick Lugenbiel
SASebastian Adeberg
Sebastian Adeberg
Purpose: Small molecules targeting fibroblast activation protein (FAP) have emerged as a new group of tracers for positron emission tomography (PET) in 2018. While most of the existing literature has been focussed on the application of FAP-specific PET in various kinds of cancers, some researchers have, both intentionally or unintentionally, used FAP-specific PET in patients with non-cancerous diseases. The purpose of this systematic review is therefore to summarize the available evidence of FAP-specific PET for non-malignant indications.Methods: The MEDLINE database was searched for studies presenting the clinical use of FAP-specific PET, the records were screened according to PRISMA guidelines and articles containing patients suffering from non-malignant diseases were included.Results: Sixteen studies with 303 patients were included. FAP-specific PET has been used in cardiac imaging, IgG4-related disease, benign tumors as well as various kinds of inflammation. Two prospective studies on FAP-specific PET for IgG4-related disease show its potential to differentiate inflammatory from fibrotic lesions, which could be used to determine the management of these patients.Conclusion: While publications on FAP-specific PET for non-malignant indications are mostly limited to case reports and incidental findings, the first retrospective and prospective studies present promising results for IgG4-related as well as cardiovascular disease that warrant further research. Several currently recruiting trials will add to the body evidence in the next few years.