Amide proton transfer‐weighted (APTw) MR imaging shows promise as a biomarker of brain tumor status. Currently used APTw MRI pulse sequences and protocols vary substantially among different institutes, and there are no agreed‐on standards in the imaging community. Therefore, the results acquired from different research centers are difficult to compare, which hampers uniform clinical application and interpretation. This paper reviews current clinical APTw imaging approaches and provides a rationale for optimized APTw brain tumor imaging at 3 T, including specific recommendations for pulse sequences, acquisition protocols, and data processing methods. We expect that these consensus recommendations will become the first broadly accepted guidelines for APTw imaging of brain tumors on 3 T MRI systems from different vendors. This will allow more medical centers to use the same or comparable APTw MRI techniques for the detection, characterization, and monitoring of brain tumors, enabling multi‐center trials in larger patient cohorts and, ultimately, routine clinical use.

Early identification of prognostic superior characteristics in glioma patients such as isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation and O⁶-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status is of great clinical importance. The study purpose was to investigate the non-invasive predictability of IDH mutation status, MGMT promoter methylation, and differentiation of low-grade versus high-grade glioma (LGG vs HGG) in newly diagnosed patients employing relaxation-compensated multipool chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI at 7.0 Tesla. Thirty-one patients with newly diagnosed glioma were included in this prospective study. CEST MRI was performed at a 7T whole-body scanner. Nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) and isolated amide proton transfer (APT; downfield NOE-suppressed APT = dns-APT) CEST signals (mean value and 90^th signal percentile) were quantitatively investigated in the whole tumor area with regard to predictability of IDH mutation, MGMT promoter methylation status, and differentiation of LGG versus HGG. Statistics were performed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) analysis. Results were compared with advanced MRI methods (apparent diffusion coefficient and relative cerebral blood volume ROC/AUC analysis) obtained at 3T. dns-APT CEST yielded highest AUCs in IDH mutation status prediction (dns-APT_mean = 91.84%, P < 0.01; dns-APT₉₀ = 97.96%, P < 0.001). Furthermore, dns-APT metrics enabled significant differentiation of LGG versus HGG (AUC: dns-APT_mean = 0.78, P < 0.05; dns-APT₉₀ = 0.83, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference regarding MGMT promoter methylation status at any contrast (P > 0.05). Relaxation-compensated multipool CEST MRI, particularly dns-APT imaging, enabled prediction of IDH mutation status and differentiation of LGG versus HGG and should therefore be considered as a non-invasive MR biomarker in the diagnostic workup.

Objectives: Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) have become an integral part in daily clinical decision making in the last 3 decades. However, there is a broad consensus that GBCAs should be exclusively used if no contrast-free magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique is available to reduce the amount of applied GBCAs in patients. In the current study, we investigate the possibility of predicting contrast enhancement from noncontrast multiparametric brain MRI scans using a deep-learning (DL) architecture. Materials and Methods: A Bayesian DL architecture for the prediction of virtual contrast enhancement was developed using 10-channel multiparametric MRI data acquired before GBCA application. The model was quantitatively and qualitatively evaluated on 116 data sets from glioma patients and healthy subjects by comparing the virtual contrast enhancement maps to the ground truth contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging. Subjects were split in 3 different groups: enhancing tumors (n = 47), nonenhancing tumors (n = 39), and patients without pathologic changes (n = 30). The tumor regions were segmented for a detailed analysis of subregions. The influence of the different MRI sequences was determined. Results: Quantitative results of the virtual contrast enhancement yielded a sensitivity of 91.8% and a specificity of 91.2%. T2-weighted imaging, followed by diffusion-weighted imaging, was the most influential sequence for the prediction of virtual contrast enhancement. Analysis of the whole brain showed a mean area under the curve of 0.969 ± 0.019, a peak signal-to-noise ratio of 22.967 ± 1.162 dB, and a structural similarity index of 0.872 ± 0.031. Enhancing and nonenhancing tumor subregions performed worse (except for the peak signal-to-noise ratio of the nonenhancing tumors). The qualitative evaluation by 2 raters using a 4-point Likert scale showed good to excellent (3–4) results for 91.5% of the enhancing and 92.3% of the nonenhancing gliomas. However, despite the good scores and ratings, there were visual deviations between the virtual contrast maps and the ground truth, including a more blurry, less nodular-like ring enhancement, few low-contrast false-positive enhancements of nonenhancing gliomas, and a tendency to omit smaller vessels. These “features” were also exploited by 2 trained radiologists when performing a Turing test, allowing them to discriminate between real and virtual contrast-enhanced images in 80% and 90% of the cases, respectively. Conclusions: The introduced model for virtual gadolinium enhancement demonstrates a very good quantitative and qualitative performance. Future systematic studies in larger patient collectives with varying neurological disorders need to evaluate if the introduced virtual contrast enhancement might reduce GBCA exposure in clinical practice.