This study aims to investigate the impact of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) on bank performance (FP) in the Middle East, North Africa and Turkey (MENAT) region. The sample consists of 46 listed banks between 2007–2019. FP is measured through accounting (Return on Assets Return on Equity) and market indicators (Tobin’s Q Stock Return ). We test the effect of ESG and its quadratic term on FP by controlling for bank-specific, macroeconomic and financial development variables. Our results support the presence of a non-linear ESG–FP relationship. ESG incremental investments remain beneficial till reaching an inflection point. Interestingly, the financial development variables are significant, while ESG pillars follow different patterns. Governance pillar has a concave relationship with accounting performance while environmental pillar has a convex relationship with the market return. The ESG–FP relationship depends on three vectors: pillars; measure of FP; and level of ESG. Banks should determine ESG turning points to rationalize their investments and contemplate efficient returns.

This study is epicentral to analyze the impact of the Russia–Ukraine war on the financial markets, specifically focusing on the connectedness and spillover dynamics of FinTech, Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG), renewable energy, gold, and Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) indices in developed and emerging countries. Data are collected from Thomson Reuters, ranging from May 8, 2020, to May 11, 2022, and a time‐varying parameter vector autoregression (TVP‐VAR) and the dynamic conditional correlation (DCC) generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) t‐Copula (DCC‐GARCH t‐Copula) are used to analyze the data. The results show that FinTech, ESG, and MSCI are net transmitters in developed countries, whereas gold and renewable energy are net receivers pre‐ and during war periods. ESG and MSCI are net transmitters in emerging countries, while FinTech, renewable energy, and gold become net receivers in both periods. The hedging ratio sheds light on the costs and weights of efficient pair investments that might change in the context of each region and under the combined scenario. The study has important implications for merchant bankers, policymakers, investors, hedgers, and risk managers.

This paper aims to empirically examine the link between corporate governance and the financial performance of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Lebanon. To this end, we use a questionnaire and collect data from a sample of 150 non-listed companies. The Bundles approach following R. Aguilera et al. ( 2008 Aguilera, R. , I.Filatotchev, H.Gospel, and G.Jackson . 2008. “An Organizational Approach to Comparative Corporate Governance: Costs, Contingencies, and Complementarities.” Organ. Sci. 19: 475–492. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar] ). ‘An Organizational Approach to Comparative Corporate Governance: Costs, Contingencies, and Complementarities.’ Organization Science 19: 475–492.) is used to construct a corporate governance score based on three main components. By applying 2SLS regression to control for endogeneity and a quantile regression, we study the impact of corporate governance (CG) score and each of its components on the financial performance (FP) measured by return on assets (ROA) and return on investment (ROI) while controlling for SMEs age, size, and industry. The study indicates positive interdependency between CG and FP. Effective CG results in increased FP and better performing companies tend to improve their CG). Interestingly, our results show that this relationship depends on the level of SMEs FP These findings provide managers with useful insights and serve as an underpinning for more regulatory efforts aimed at strengthening the CG of SMEs in Lebanon.

An uphill question of whether Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) directly impact firms' financial performance (FP) continues to vacillate between two opponent streams. In the present study, we argue that COVID-19 is an extreme event where the effect of ESG sharply manifests. We rely on cross-sectional data in the context of G20 countries for the year 2020. To avoid biased results due to governments support, we integrate four novel metrics provided by the Oxford Coronavirus Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT). We run sequential regressions (OLS; and quartiles to account for the Ingrained Income Bias (IIB) and ESG scores). We also perform robustness tests and account for the interaction between ESG and cash level. Our models were subsequently replicated for each ESG pillar. Findings indicate that ESG is beneficial during COVID-19, but the reward appears to be closely tied up to specific aspects of ESG, income level, and firm-specific variables. Results contribute to the burgeoning literature on ESG during COVID-19 by reflecting on firms’ key attributes and the preponderance of government support.

This study explores the impact of FinTech firms adhering to manufacturing efficiency practices compared with their counterparts during the fourth industrial revolution. The purpose is to provide empirical evidence of FinTech firms' operating efficiency and see corporate efficiency impacts market performance. The data has been collected from Bloomberg of all FinTech and non-FinTech companies in the United States for 1,712 company-year observations from 2010 until 2019. The results reveal manufacturing Efficiency of FinTech firms directly relates to their market performance. Besides, our regression analyses indicate that non-FinTech companies display inferior efficiency practices, leading to lower market performance than FinTech firms. The study’s outcomes are important as they highlighted the efficiency of the FinTech and non-FinTech companies, offering insights to a wide range of stakeholders, including researchers, policymakers, regulators, financial report users, investors, environmental unions, employees, clients, and society.