Francesco Lolli

Dr. Francesco Lolli

Department of Sciences and Methods for Engineering, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola 2, Padiglione Morselli, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy.
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2019 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMaria Angela Butturi
Maria Angela Butturi
Francesco LolliFrancesco Lolli
Francesco Lolli
Miguel Afonso SellittoMiguel Afonso Sellitto
Miguel Afonso Sellitto
EBElia Balugani
Elia Balugani
RGR. Gamberini
R. Gamberini
BRB. Rimini
B. Rimini

1 October 2014 in International Journal of Production Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Francesco LolliFrancesco Lolli
Francesco Lolli
Alessio IshizakaAlessio Ishizaka
Alessio Ishizaka
RGR. Gamberini
R. Gamberini

1 January 2017 in International Journal of Production Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Francesco LolliFrancesco Lolli
Francesco Lolli
RGR. Gamberini
R. Gamberini
ARA. Regattieri
A. Regattieri
EBElia Balugani
Elia Balugani
TGT. Gatos
T. Gatos
SGS. Gucci
S. Gucci

1 February 2020 in Journal of Hazardous Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Samuele MarinelloSamuele Marinello
Samuele Marinello
Francesco LolliFrancesco Lolli
Francesco Lolli
RGRita Gamberini
Rita Gamberini
BRBianca Rimini
Bianca Rimini

1 October 2015 in Expert Systems with Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Francesco LolliFrancesco Lolli
Francesco Lolli
Alessio IshizakaAlessio Ishizaka
Alessio Ishizaka
RGRita Gamberini
Rita Gamberini
BRBianca Rimini
Bianca Rimini
MMMichael Messori
Michael Messori
Most of real world decision making activities involve multiple decision-makers.FlowSort-GDSS (group decision support system) is proposed to solve sorting problems with multiple decision-makers.FlowSort-GDSS is applied to the failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA).A blow moulding process is analysed by the FMEA approach combined with FlowSort-GDSS. Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a well-known approach for correlating the failure modes of a system to their effects, with the objective of assessing their criticality. The criticality of a failure mode is traditionally established by its risk priority number (RPN), which is the product of the scores assigned to the three risk factors, which are likeness of occurrence, the chance of being undetected and the severity of the effects. Taking a simple \"unweighted\" product has major shortcomings. One of them is to provide just a number, which does not sort failures modes into priority classes. Moreover, to make the decision more robust, the FMEA is better tackled by multiple decision-makers. Unfortunately, the literature lacks group decision support systems (GDSS) for sorting failures in the field of the FMEA.In this paper, a novel multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) method named FlowSort-GDSS is proposed to sort the failure modes into priority classes by involving multiple decision-makers. The essence of this method lies in the pair-wise comparison between the failure modes and the reference profiles established by the decision-makers on the risk factors. Finally a case study is presented to illustrate the advantages of this new robust method in sorting failures.

31 October 2018 in Production Planning & Control
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Francesco LolliFrancesco Lolli
Francesco Lolli
EBElia Balugani
Elia Balugani
Alessio IshizakaAlessio Ishizaka
Alessio Ishizaka
RGR. Gamberini
R. Gamberini
BRB. Rimini
B. Rimini
ARA. Regattieri
A. Regattieri
Multi-criteria inventory classification groups inventory items into classes, each of which is managed by a specific re-order policy according to its priority. However, the tasks of inventory classification and control are not carried out jointly if the classification criteria and the classification approach are not robustly established from an inventory-cost perspective. Exhaustive simulations at the single item level of the inventory system would directly solve this issue by searching for the best re-order policy per item, thus achieving the subsequent optimal classification without resorting to any multi-criteria classification method. However, this would be very time-consuming in real settings, where a large number of items need to be managed simultaneously. In this article, a reduction in simulation effort is achieved by extracting from the population of items a sample on which to perform an exhaustive search of best re-order policies per item; the lowest cost classification of in-sample items is, therefore, achieved. Then, in line with the increasing need for ICT tools in the production management of Industry 4.0 systems, supervised classifiers from the machine learning research field (i.e. support vector machines with a Gaussian kernel and deep neural networks) are trained on these in-sample items to learn to classify the out-of-sample items solely based on the values they show on the features (i.e. classification criteria). The inventory system adopted here is suitable for intermittent demands, but it may also suit non-intermittent demands, thus providing great flexibility. The experimental analysis of two large datasets showed an excellent accuracy, which suggests that machine learning classifiers could be implemented in advanced inventory classification systems.