Edgar Santos

Dr. Edgar Santos

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 July 2016 in Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JHJed A Hartings
Jed A Hartings
CSC William Shuttleworth
C William Shuttleworth
SKSergei A Kirov
Sergei A Kirov
CACenk Ayata
Cenk Ayata
JHJason M Hinzman
Jason M Hinzman
JDJens P Dreier
Jens P Dreier
A modern understanding of how cerebral cortical lesions develop after acute brain injury is based on Aristides Leão’s historic discoveries of spreading depression and asphyxial/anoxic depolarization. Treated as separate entities for decades, we now appreciate that these events define a continuum of spreading mass depolarizations, a concept that is central to understanding their pathologic effects. Within minutes of acute severe ischemia, the onset of persistent depolarization triggers the breakdown of ion homeostasis and development of cytotoxic edema. These persistent changes are diagnosed as diffusion restriction in magnetic resonance imaging and define the ischemic core. In delayed lesion growth, transient spreading depolarizations arise spontaneously in the ischemic penumbra and induce further persistent depolarization and excitotoxic damage, progressively expanding the ischemic core. The causal role of these waves in lesion development has been proven by real-time monitoring of electrophysiology, blood flow, and cytotoxic edema. The spreading depolarization continuum further applies to other models of acute cortical lesions, suggesting that it is a universal principle of cortical lesion development. These pathophysiologic concepts establish a working hypothesis for translation to human disease, where complex patterns of depolarizations are observed in acute brain injury and appear to mediate and signal ongoing secondary damage.

20 July 2016 in Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JDJens P Dreier
Jens P Dreier
MFMartin Fabricius
Martin Fabricius
CACenk Ayata
Cenk Ayata
OSOliver W Sakowitz
Oliver W Sakowitz
CSC William Shuttleworth
C William Shuttleworth
JHJed A Hartings
Jed A Hartings
Spreading depolarizations (SD) are waves of abrupt, near-complete breakdown of neuronal transmembrane ion gradients, are the largest possible pathophysiologic disruption of viable cerebral gray matter, and are a crucial mechanism of lesion development. Spreading depolarizations are increasingly recorded during multimodal neuromonitoring in neurocritical care as a causal biomarker providing a diagnostic summary measure of metabolic failure and excitotoxic injury. Focal ischemia causes spreading depolarization within minutes. Further spreading depolarizations arise for hours to days due to energy supply-demand mismatch in viable tissue. Spreading depolarizations exacerbate neuronal injury through prolonged ionic breakdown and spreading depolarization-related hypoperfusion (spreading ischemia). Local duration of the depolarization indicates local tissue energy status and risk of injury. Regional electrocorticographic monitoring affords even remote detection of injury because spreading depolarizations propagate widely from ischemic or metabolically stressed zones; characteristic patterns, including temporal clusters of spreading depolarizations and persistent depression of spontaneous cortical activity, can be recognized and quantified. Here, we describe the experimental basis for interpreting these patterns and illustrate their translation to human disease. We further provide consensus recommendations for electrocorticographic methods to record, classify, and score spreading depolarizations and associated spreading depressions. These methods offer distinct advantages over other neuromonitoring modalities and allow for future refinement through less invasive and more automated approaches.

1 January 2021 in Revista Clínica Española
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MCM. Palacios Cruz
M. Palacios Cruz
ESEdgar Santos
Edgar Santos
Manuel Adrián Velázquez-CervantesManuel Adrián Velázquez-Cervantes
Manuel Adrián Velázquez-Cervantes
Moisés León-JuárezMoisés León-Juárez
Moisés León-Juárez

1 October 2014 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ESEdgar Santos
Edgar Santos
MSMichael Schöll
Michael Schöll
RSRenán Sánchez-Porras
Renán Sánchez-Porras
MDMarkus A. Dahlem
Markus A. Dahlem
Humberto SilosHumberto Silos
Humberto Silos
OSOliver W. Sakowitz
Oliver W. Sakowitz

1 May 2019 in EBioMedicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SLSvetlana Lublinsky
Svetlana Lublinsky
SMSebastian Major
Sebastian Major
VKVasilis Kola
Vasilis Kola
VHViktor Horst
Viktor Horst
ESEdgar Santos
Edgar Santos
AFAlon Friedman
Alon Friedman
Disease progression and delayed neurological complications are common after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). We explored the potential of quantitative blood-brain barrier (BBB) imaging to predict disease progression and neurological outcome. Data were collected as part of the Co-Operative Studies of Brain Injury Depolarizations (COSBID). We analyzed retrospectively, blinded and semi-automatically magnetic resonance images from 124 aSAH patients scanned at 4 time points (24-48 h, 6-8 days, 12-15 days and 6-12 months) after the initial hemorrhage. Volume of brain with apparent pathology and/or BBB dysfunction (BBBD), subarachnoid space and lateral ventricles were measured. Neurological status on admission was assessed using the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies and Rosen-Macdonald scores. Outcome at ≥6 months was assessed using the extended Glasgow outcome scale and disease course (progressive or non-progressive based on imaging-detected loss of normal brain tissue in consecutive scans). Logistic regression was used to define biomarkers that best predict outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to assess accuracy of outcome prediction models. In the present cohort, 63% of patients had progressive and 37% non-progressive disease course. Progressive course was associated with worse outcome at ≥6 months (sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 97%). Brain volume with BBBD was significantly larger in patients with progressive course already 24-48 h after admission (2.23 (1.23-3.17) folds, median with 95%CI), and persisted at all time points. The highest probability of a BBB-disrupted voxel to become pathological was found at a distance of ≤1 cm from the brain with apparent pathology (0·284 (0·122-0·594), p < 0·001, median with 95%CI). A multivariate logistic regression model revealed power for BBBD in combination with RMS at 24-48 h in predicting outcome (ROC area under the curve = 0·829, p < 0·001). We suggest that early identification of BBBD may serve as a key predictive biomarker for neurological outcome in aSAH. FUND: Dr. Dreier was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) (DFG DR 323/5-1 and DFG DR 323/10-1), the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) Center for Stroke Research Berlin 01 EO 0801 and FP7 no 602150 CENTER-TBI. Dr. Friedman was supported by grants from Israel Science Foundation and Canada Institute for Health Research (CIHR). Dr. Friedman was supported by grants from European Union's Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013; grant #602102).

1 January 2013 in Stroke
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
OSOliver W. Sakowitz
Oliver W. Sakowitz
ESEdgar Santos
Edgar Santos
ANAlexandra Nagel
Alexandra Nagel
KKKara L. Krajewski
Kara L. Krajewski
DHDaniel N. Hertle
Daniel N. Hertle
ASAsita S. Sarrafzadeh
Asita S. Sarrafzadeh
Background and Purpose—: We studied the dynamics of extracellular brain tissue concentrations of glucose, lactate, pyruvate, and glutamate during the occurrence of spreading depolarizations (SDs) in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Methods—: In this prospective observational study, patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage received multimodal cerebral monitoring, including intracranial pressure, cerebral microdialysis, and subdural electrocorticography. Results—: Seven of the 17 recruited patients had intracerebral hemorrhage, acute ischemia and severe brain oedema leading to acute ischemic neurological deficits associated with early disturbance of metabolism at the recording site. They displayed a total of 130 SDs. The remaining 10 patients without acute ischemic neurological deficits exhibited 138 single SDs and 68 SDs in clusters. In patients without acute ischemic neurological deficits, clustered SDs were associated with a significant transient decrease in glucose and increase in lactate compared with baseline during the first 140 minutes after SDs. Moreover, the number of clustered SDs correlated with the outcome ( R =−0.659; P <0.01). Conclusion—: SDs can propagate in nonischemic human brain tissue. Clusters of SDs are related to metabolic changes suggestive of ongoing secondary damage in primarily nonischemic brain tissue.