Alessandro Stefano

Dr. Alessandro Stefano

IBSBC, National Research Council, Rome, Lazio, Italy
orcid
Senior Researcher

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 February 2021 in Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Renato CuocoloRenato Cuocolo
Renato Cuocolo
Albert ComelliAlbert Comelli
Albert Comelli
Alessandro StefanoAlessandro Stefano
Alessandro Stefano
VBViviana Benfante
Viviana Benfante
NDNavdeep Dahiya
Navdeep Dahiya
MIMassimo Imbriaco
Massimo Imbriaco

15 January 2021 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Albert ComelliAlbert Comelli
Albert Comelli
Navdeep DahiyaNavdeep Dahiya
Navdeep Dahiya
Alessandro StefanoAlessandro Stefano
Alessandro Stefano
Federica VernuccioFederica Vernuccio
Federica Vernuccio
MPMarzia Portoghese
Marzia Portoghese
AYAnthony Yezzi
Anthony Yezzi
Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based prostate segmentation is an essential task for adaptive radiotherapy and for radiomics studies whose purpose is to identify associations between imaging features and patient outcomes. Because manual delineation is a time-consuming task, we present three deep-learning (DL) approaches, namely UNet, efficient neural network (ENet), and efficient residual factorized convNet (ERFNet), whose aim is to tackle the fully-automated, real-time, and 3D delineation process of the prostate gland on T2-weighted MRI. While UNet is used in many biomedical image delineation applications, ENet and ERFNet are mainly applied in self-driving cars to compensate for limited hardware availability while still achieving accurate segmentation. We apply these models to a limited set of 85 manual prostate segmentations using the k-fold validation strategy and the Tversky loss function and we compare their results. We find that ENet and UNet are more accurate than ERFNet, with ENet much faster than UNet. Specifically, ENet obtains a dice similarity coefficient of 90.89% and a segmentation time of about 6 s using central processing unit (CPU) hardware to simulate real clinical conditions where graphics processing unit (GPU) is not always available. In conclusion, ENet could be efficiently applied for prostate delineation even in small image training datasets with potential benefit for patient management personalization.

3 July 2024 in Computers in Biology and Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Alessandro StefanoAlessandro Stefano
Alessandro Stefano
Radiomics, the high-throughput extraction of quantitative imaging features from medical images, holds immense potential for advancing precision medicine in oncology and beyond. While radiomics applied to positron emission tomography (PET) imaging offers unique insights into tumor biology and treatment response, it is imperative to elucidate the challenges and constraints inherent in this domain to facilitate their translation into clinical practice. This review examines the challenges and limitations of applying radiomics to PET imaging, synthesizing findings from the last five years (2019-2023) and highlights the significance of addressing these challenges to realize the full clinical potential of radiomics in oncology and molecular imaging. A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, using keywords relevant to radiomics issues in PET imaging. Only studies published in peer-reviewed journals were eligible for inclusion in this review. Although many studies have highlighted the potential of radiomics in predicting treatment response, assessing tumor heterogeneity, enabling risk stratification, and personalized therapy selection, various challenges regarding the practical implementation of the proposed models still need to be addressed. This review illustrates the challenges and limitations of radiomics in PET imaging across various cancer types, encompassing both phantom and clinical investigations. The analyzed studies highlight the importance of reproducible segmentation methods, standardized pre-processing and post-processing methodologies, and the need to create large multicenter studies registered in a centralized database to promote the continuous validation and clinical integration of radiomics into PET imaging.

14 January 2021 in European Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Pierpaolo AlongiPierpaolo Alongi
Pierpaolo Alongi
Alessandro StefanoAlessandro Stefano
Alessandro Stefano
Albert ComelliAlbert Comelli
Albert Comelli
RLRiccardo Laudicella
Riccardo Laudicella
SSSalvatore Scalisi
Salvatore Scalisi
GRGiorgio Russo
Giorgio Russo

20 November 2020 in Biomedical Engineering Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Albert ComelliAlbert Comelli
Albert Comelli
Navdeep DahiyaNavdeep Dahiya
Navdeep Dahiya
Alessandro StefanoAlessandro Stefano
Alessandro Stefano
VBViviana Benfante
Viviana Benfante
GGGiovanni Gentile
Giovanni Gentile
Salvatore PastaSalvatore Pasta
Salvatore Pasta

30 October 2021 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Alessandro StefanoAlessandro Stefano
Alessandro Stefano
APAntonio Leal Plaza
Antonio Leal Plaza
Selene RichiusaSelene Richiusa
Selene Richiusa
PTPhan Trang
Phan Trang
Albert ComelliAlbert Comelli
Albert Comelli
Giorgio RussoGiorgio Russo
Giorgio Russo
Radiomics holds great promise in the field of cancer management. However, the clinical application of radiomics has been hampered by uncertainty about the robustness of the features extracted from the images. Previous studies have reported that radiomics features are sensitive to changes in voxel size resampling and interpolation, image perturbation, or slice thickness. This study aims to observe the variability of positron emission tomography (PET) radiomics features under the impact of co-registration with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using the difference percentage coefficient, and the Spearman’s correlation coefficient for three groups of images: (i) original PET, (ii) PET after co-registration with T1-weighted MRI and (iii) PET after co-registration with FLAIR MRI. Specifically, seventeen patients with brain cancers undergoing [11C]-Methionine PET were considered. Successively, PET images were co-registered with MRI sequences and 107 features were extracted for each mentioned group of images. The variability analysis revealed that shape features, first-order features and two subgroups of higher-order features possessed a good robustness, unlike the remaining groups of features, which showed large differences in the difference percentage coefficient. Furthermore, using the Spearman’s correlation coefficient, approximately 40% of the selected features differed from the three mentioned groups of images. This is an important consideration for users conducting radiomics studies with image co-registration constraints to avoid errors in cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and clinical outcome prediction.