Background: In March 2020, many elective medical services were canceled in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The daily case rate is now declining in many states and there is a need for guidance about the resumption of elective clinical services for patients with lung disease or sleep conditions. Methods: Volunteers were solicited from the Association of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Division Directors and American Thoracic Society. Working groups developed plans by discussion and consensus for resuming elective services in pulmonary and sleep-medicine clinics, pulmonary function testing laboratories, bronchoscopy and procedure suites, polysomnography laboratories, and pulmonary rehabilitation facilities. Results: The community new case rate should be consistently low or have a downward trajectory for at least 14 days before resuming elective clinical services. In addition, institutions should have an operational strategy that consists of patient prioritization, screening, diagnostic testing, physical distancing, infection control, and follow-up surveillance. The goals are to protect patients and staff from exposure to the virus, account for limitations in staff, equipment, and space that are essential for the care of patients with COVID-19, and provide access to care for patients with acute and chronic conditions. Conclusions: Transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a dynamic process and, therefore, it is likely that the prevalence of COVID-19 in the community will wax and wane. This will impact an institution’s mitigation needs. Operating procedures should be frequently reassessed and modified as needed. The suggestions provided are those of the authors and do not represent official positions of the Association of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Division Directors or the American Thoracic Society.

Objectives: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is extremely common in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) patients and predicts increased mortality. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), highly prevalent in congestive heart failure patients, may contribute to further elevated pulmonary pressures. This study evaluates the impact of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy on PH in patients admitted for ADHF with OSA.Methods: A two-center randomized control trial comparing standard of care (SOC) therapy for ADHF versus addition of PAP therapy in patients with concomitant OSA.Results: Twenty-one consecutive patients were enrolled with 1:1 randomization to SOC versus SOC plus 48-hour PAP therapy protocol. In the intervention arm, the mean pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) difference before therapy and after 48 hours of PAP therapy was −15.8 ± 3.2 (58.6 ± 2.5 mm Hg to 42.8 ± 2.7) versus the SOC arm where the mean PASP difference was −5.2 ± 2.6 (62.7 ± 3.3 mm Hg reduced to 57.5 ± 3.9) (p = 0.025). In addition, ejection fraction in the intervention arm improved (3.4 ± 1.5% versus −0.5 ± 0.5 %) (p = 0.01). Significant improvement was also noted in tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and right ventricular systolic area in the intervention arm but not in NT-pro-BNP or 6-minute walk distance.Conclusions: In patients with ADHF and OSA, addition of 48 hours of PAP therapy to SOC treatment significantly reduced PH. In addition, PAP therapy was able to improve right and left ventricular function.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02963597.

We read with interest several manuscripts recently published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) on the ongoing coronavirus pandemic. While these articles provide a well-rounded overview on the risk and current status of this virus, we herein add some relevant information on its etiology, prevention and management, especially for resource-limited healthcare systems. The use of protective actions is both complex and expensive. Affordable options are essential to respond to this and future viral outbreaks.